Cited by 67Migration, Health and TraumaPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

A pilot randomized controlled trial of interpersonal psychotherapy for Sudanese refugees in Cairo, Egypt

Meffert, Susan M., Abdo, Akram Osman, Alla, Omayma Ahmed Abd, Elmakki, Yasir Omer Mustafa, Omer, Afrah Abdelrahim, Yousif, Sahar, Metzler, Thomas J., Marmar, Charles R.·2014·Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy

Abstract

Approximately one third of a population exposed to mass violence develops posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and approximately half develops depression, yet little is known about how to effectively treat these populations. This study’s objective was to examine the impact of interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) on Sudanese refugees living in Cairo, Egypt, who had symptoms of PTSD. A randomized controlled trial (April–August 2008) with 22 Sudanese refugees in Cairo, Egypt, tested two hypotheses: (1) After IPT, participants will have fewer symptoms of depression and PTSD compared with waitlist controls. (2) After IPT, participants will have less interpersonal violence compared with waitlist controls. Participants were randomly assigned to either 6 sessions of IPT delivered by Sudanese community therapists without previous mental health training or a waitlist control group. Measures taken at baseline and trial conclusion included the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire, the Beck Depression Index—II, the Conflict Tactics Scale, and the State-Trait Anger Inventory, all translated and adapted for local use. The effect sizes of IPT treatment for PTSD symptoms, depression, state anger, trait anger, and Conflict Tactics Scale—Violence Toward Household were 2.52, 2.38, 1.21, 1.43, and 0.84, respectively. IPT predicted a significant decrease in symptoms of PTSD, state anger, and depression using a conservative intent-to-treat analysis. This study represents the first randomized controlled trial of IPT to address PTSD, depression, and interpersonal violence in a refugee population. The study’s preliminary success has positive implications for development of effective and sustainable mental health interventions to support the recovery of traumatized populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0023540

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meffert, S. M., Abdo, A. O., Alla, O. A. A., Elmakki, Y. O. M., Omer, A. A., Yousif, S., Metzler, T. J., & Marmar, C. R.
Venue
Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy
Published
2014-05
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
240-249
ISSN
  • 1942-9681 (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-969X
OpenAlex
W2316743125
Cited by
67
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of California, San Francisco
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
interpersonal psychotherapy, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, Sudanese refugees, interpersonal violence, anger, community therapists, refugee mental health, conflict tactics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review