Cited by 149Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Animal models of prefrontal-executive function

Chudasama, Yogita·2011·Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Executive function allows us to interact with the world in a purposive, goal-directed manner. It relies on several cognitive control operations that are mediated by different regions of the prefrontal cortex. While much of our knowledge about the functional subdivisions of the prefrontal cortex comes from the systematic assessment of patients with brain damage, animal models have served as the predominant tool for investigating specific structure-function relationships within the prefrontal cortex, especially as they relate to complex executive behaviors. These studies generally involve the targeted disruption of neural circuits combined with behavioral testing using carefully designed cognitive paradigms. In this review, I will describe a broad range of such experiments conducted in rats and monkeys that together reveal the distinct contributions of dorsal, medial, and ventral prefrontal cortex to different aspects of executive function. The effects of lesions and local pharmacological manipulations have provided valuable insights into the neural underpinnings of executive function and its neurochemical modulation. Despite the challenges associated with establishing a precise homology between animal models of prefrontal function and the human brain, such models currently offer the best means to systematically investigate the cognitive building blocks of executive function. This helps define the neural circuits that lead to a range of neurological and psychiatric disorders and facilitate the development of effective therapeutic strategies to ameliorate the associated cognitive impairments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0023766

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chudasama, Y.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Chudasama, Yogita
Venue
Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2011
Volume
125
Issue
3
Pages
327-343
ISSN
  • 0735-7044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0084
OpenAlex
W2069271056
Cited by
149
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 14
FWCI
6.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
executive function, prefrontal cortex, dorsal prefrontal cortex, medial prefrontal cortex, ventral prefrontal cortex, cognitive control, lesion studies, pharmacological manipulation, rats, monkeys, structure-function relationship, cognitive impairment, mental illness
MeSH terms
Animals, Attention, Decision Making, Impulsive Behavior, Memory, Short-Term, Neural Pathways, Reversal Learning, Reward, Space Perception, Visual Perception, Prefrontal Cortex, Models, Animal, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review