Cited by 63Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Basolateral amygdala lesions facilitate reward choices after negative feedback in rats

Open access
Izquierdo, Alicia, Darling, Chelsi, Manos, Nic, Pozos, Hilda, Kim, Charissa, Ostrander, Serena, Cazares, Victor, Stepp, Haley +1 more·2013·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and basolateral amygdala (BLA) constitute part of a neural circuit important for adaptive, goal-directed learning. One task measuring flexibility of response to changes in reward is discrimination reversal learning. Damage to OFC produces well documented impairments on various forms of reversal learning in rodents, monkeys, and humans. Recent reports show that BLA, though highly interconnected with OFC, may be differentially involved in reversal learning. In the present experiment, we compared the effects of bilateral, ibotenic acid lesions of OFC or BLA (or SHAM) on visual discrimination and reversal learning. Specifically, we used pairwise visual discrimination methods, as is commonly administered in non-human primate studies, and analyzed how animals use positive and negative trial-by-trial feedback, domains not previously explored in a rat study. As expected, OFC lesions displayed significantly slower reversal learning than SHAM and BLA rats across sessions. Rats with BLA lesions, conversely, showed facilitated reversal learning relative to SHAM and OFC groups. Furthermore, a trial-by-trial analysis of the errors committed showed the BLA group benefited more from incorrectly performed trials (or negative feedback) on future choices than either SHAM or OFC rats. This provides evidence that BLA and OFC are involved in updating responses to changes in reward contingency and that the roles are distinct. Our results are discussed in relation to a competitive framework model for OFC and BLA in reward processing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.4942-12.2013

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The striatum, amygdala, and hippocampus are important for reversal learning.

    “Other brain regions important for reversal learning are the striatum (Cools et al 2002, Rogers et al 2000), amygdala (Izquierdo et al 2013, Schoenbaum et al 2003, Wassum & Izquierdo 2015) and the hippocampus (Mala et al 2015).”

    From Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease (2018) · cites this paper as Izquierdo et al 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Izquierdo, A., Darling, C., Manos, N., Pozos, H., Kim, C., Ostrander, S., Cazares, V., Stepp, H., & Rudebeck, P. H.
Affiliations
  • California State University Los Angeles (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2013-02-27
Volume
33
Issue
9
Pages
4105-4109
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2048745224
Cited by
63
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (SC2MH087974)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
basolateral amygdala, orbitofrontal cortex, reversal learning, discrimination reversal learning, negative feedback, reward contingency, trial-by-trial feedback, ibotenic acid lesions, goal-directed learning, reward processing, rats
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Choice Behavior, Conditioning, Operant, Discrimination Learning, Feedback, Food Preferences, Ibotenic Acid, Male, Photic Stimulation, Reversal Learning, Reward, Prefrontal Cortex, Excitatory Amino Acid Agonists, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review