Replicability and 40-year predictive power of childhood ARC types.
Open accessAbstract
We examined 3 questions surrounding the undercontrolled, overcontrolled, and resilient-or Asendorpf-Robins-Caspi (ARC)-personality types originally identified by Block (1971). In analyses of the teacher personality assessments of over 2,000 children in 1st through 6th grade in 1959-1967 and follow-up data on general and cardiovascular health outcomes in over 1,100 adults recontacted 40 years later, we found bootstrapped internal replication clustering suggesting that Big Five scores were best characterized by a tripartite cluster structure corresponding to the ARC types. This cluster structure was fuzzy rather than discrete, indicating that ARC constructs are best represented as gradients of similarity to 3 prototype Big Five profiles; ARC types and degrees of ARC prototypicality showed associations with multiple health outcomes 40 years later. ARC constructs were more parsimonious but, depending on the outcome, comparable or slightly worse classifiers than the dimensional Big Five traits. Forty-year incident cases of heart disease could be correctly identified with 67% accuracy by childhood personality information alone and stroke incidence with over 70% accuracy. Findings support the theoretical validity of ARC constructs, their treatment as continua of prototypicality rather than discrete categories, and the need for further understanding the robust predictive power of childhood personality for midlife health.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A variation of the theoretically driven approach has derived measures of similarity to theoretically important personality profiles or trait configurations, such as Type D or the 'undercontrolled' personality, using general Big 5 scales, with good success in identifying personality-health links.
“A variation of this theoretically driven approach has derived measures of similarity to theoretically important personality profiles or trait configurations, such as Type D or the “undercontrolled” personality, using general Big 5 scales, with good success in identifying personality-health links [51, 197].”
From Personality and Longevity: Knowns, Unknowns, and Implications for Public Health and Personalized Medicine (2011) · cites this paper as [51]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies.
Idler, E. L., & Benyamini, Y. (1997) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2955359 · Cited by 8,598 · see citing works
Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x · Cited by 2,361 · see citing works
Self-citationPersonality disorders and the five factor model of personality
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1990) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi.1990.4.4.362 · Cited by 1,653 · see citing works
Long‐Term Relations of Personality and Health: Dynamisms, Mechanisms, Tropisms
Friedman, H. S. (2000) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00127 · Cited by 514 · see citing works
Personality, Socioeconomic Status, and All-Cause Mortality in the United States
Chapman, B. P., Fiscella, K., Kawachi, I., & Duberstein, P. R. (2010) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwp323 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Distressed personality type: replicability and general health associations
Chapman, B. P., Duberstein, P. R., & Lyness, J. M. (2007) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.645 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fair, D. A., Bathula, D., Nikolas, M. A., & Nigg, J. T. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1115365109 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
Chapman, B. P., Roberts, B., & Duberstein, P. (2011) · Journal of Aging Research · doi:10.4061/2011/759170 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
“Nevertheless, personality researchers are increasingly considering how to incorporate other measurement methods, such as informant reports, into personality assessment in health research.”
BackgroundSelf-citationRadically Open-Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Disorders of Over-Control: Signaling Matters.
Lynch, T. R., Hempel, R. J., & Dunkley, C. (2015) · American Journal of Psychotherapy · doi:10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2015.69.2.141 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Radically open dialectical behaviour therapy for refractory depression: the RefraMED RCT
Lynch, T. R., Hempel, R. J., Whalley, B., Byford, S., Chamba, R., Clarke, P., Clarke, S., Kingdon, D., O’Mahen, H., Remington, B., et al. (2018) · Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation · doi:10.3310/eme05070 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chapman, B. P., & Goldberg, L. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Rochester Medicine (US)
- Oregon Research Institute (US)
- ORCID
- Chapman, Benjamin P.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 593-606
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- PMC
- PMC3160513
- OpenAlex
- W1998656209
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 9.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- US Department of Health and Human Services (R01AG20048)
- National Institutes of Health (T32MH073452, R21AG023956, K08AG031328)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Keywords
- child personality, Big Five personality traits, cardiovascular disease, heart disease incidence, stroke incidence, adult health outcomes, midlife health, personality continuity
- MeSH terms
- Age Factors, Cardiovascular Diseases, Child, Conscience, Extraversion, Psychological, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hawaii, Health Status, Humans, Internal-External Control, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Neurotic Disorders, Personality, Personality Inventory, Reproducibility of Results, Principal Component Analysis, Resilience, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review