Cited by 129Digital Mental Health InterventionsStress and Burnout ResearchMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Self-help stress management training through mobile phones: An experience with oncology nurses

Villani, Daniela, Grassi, Alessandra, Cognetta, Chiara, Toniolo, Davide, Cipresso, Pietro, Riva, Giuseppe·2013·Psychological Services

Abstract

Although all professions are susceptible to work-related stress, the nursing profession has been identified as particularly stressful; indeed, oncology nursing is often described as being among the most stressful specialty areas. The current study tested the short-term effects of an innovative self-help stress management training for oncology nurses supported by mobile tools. The sample included 30 female oncology nurses with permanent status employed in six oncology hospitals in Milan, Italy. The stress inoculation training (SIT) methodology served as the basis of the training, with the innovative challenge being the use of mobile phones to support the stress management experience. To test the efficacy of the protocol, the study used a between-subjects design, comparing the experimental condition (SIT through mobile phones) with a control group (neutral video through mobile phones). The findings indicated psychological improvement of the experimental group in terms of anxiety state, anxiety trait reduction, and coping skills acquisition. This paper discusses implications for the implementation of this protocol in several contexts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0026459

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Villani, D., Grassi, A., Cognetta, C., Toniolo, D., Cipresso, P., & Riva, G.
Affiliations
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
  • IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (IT)
Venue
Psychological Services
Published
2013-08
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
315-322
ISSN
  • 1541-1559 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-148X
OpenAlex
W2131075233
Cited by
129
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 4
FWCI
9.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
stress management, self-help training, mobile devices, oncology nurses, nurse stress, stress inoculation training, anxiety, coping strategies, mobile health, occupational stress
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Burnout, Professional, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Oncology Nursing, Stress, Psychological, Case-Control Studies, Treatment Outcome, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review