Cited by 260Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild and Animal Learning Development

The legacy of early experiences in development: formalizing alternative models of how early experiences are carried forward over time.

Open access
Fraley, R. Chris, Roisman, Glenn I., Haltigan, John D.·2013·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

Psychologists have long debated the role of early experience in social and cognitive development. However, traditional approaches to studying this issue are not well positioned to address this debate. The authors present simulations that indicate that the associations between early experiences and later outcomes should approach different asymptotic values across time, given alternative assumptions about the developmental significance of early experience. To test the predictions of alternative developmental models, the authors examine data from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development (SECCYD) on maternal sensitivity in the first 3 years of life and its association with social competence and academic skills through age 15. Across multimethod, multi-informant outcome data, results suggest that there may be enduring effects of early caregiving experiences in both of these domains.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0027852

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Longitudinal designs are more likely to capture the enduring effect of parenting on child development.

    “Longitudinal designs are also more likely to capture the enduring effect of parenting on child development. 90”

    From Parenting Behavior and Child Language: A Meta-analysis. (2019) · cites this paper as [90]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fraley, R. C., Roisman, G. I., & Haltigan, J. D.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2013-01
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
109-126
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2166666784
Cited by
260
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
96.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (BCS-0720538)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD054822; HD069442)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
early life experience, maternal sensitivity, social competence, academic skills, developmental model, NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development, early childhood care, computer simulation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Development, Competitive Behavior, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Mother-Child Relations, Social Behavior, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review