Cited by 67Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Does fear reactivity during exposure predict panic symptom reduction?

Open access
Meuret, Alicia E., Seidel, Anke, Rosenfield, Benjamin, Hofmann, Stefan G., Rosenfield, David·2012·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Fear reactivity during exposure is a commonly used indicator of learning and overall therapy outcome. The objective of this study was to assess the predictive value of fear reactivity during exposure using multimodal indicators and an advanced analytical design. We also investigated the degree to which treatment condition (cognitive training vs. respiratory skill training) moderated fear reactivity and therapeutic outcome. METHOD: Thirty-four patients with panic disorder and agoraphobia completed a total of 123 in-vivo exposure sessions, comprising 3 weekly sessions and a 4th session 2 months following therapy completion. Sessions varied in length and phobic stimuli. Cardiorespiratory physiology (heart rate, carbon dioxide partial pressure [PCO2], respiration rate) and experiential symptoms (panic symptoms and anxiety) were assessed repeatedly throughout exposure sessions, in addition to weekly assessments of panic cognitions, avoidance, and functioning. RESULTS: Panic symptomatology decreased substantially in both treatment conditions during therapy and follow-up. Significant cardiorespiratory and experiential reactivity was observed during all exposures, characterized by activation followed by reduction. Greater within-session activation of anxiety and panic symptoms was inversely related to improvement in panic symptoms severity, but neither physiological activation nor within- or between-session reduction of either physiological or experiential variables was predictive of outcome. No moderating effects of treatment condition were found. CONCLUSIONS: Fear activation and reduction during exposure are weak predictors of corrective learning and fear extinction. Clinical implications for exposure therapy and directions for future research are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0028032

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a study of in vivo exposure for panic disorder and agoraphobia, neither within-session nor between-session habituation indicated better outcomes.

    “A recent study by Meuret et al. (2012) examined both within- and between-session habituation during in vivo exposures for individuals with panic disorder and agoraphobia. Results showed that neither within-session or between-session habituation indicated better outcomes (Meuret, Seidel, Rosenfield, Hofmann, & Rosenfield, 2012).”

    From Does change in distress matter? Mechanisms of change in prolonged exposure for PTSD (2014) · cites this paper as Meuret et al. (2012)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Antony MM Craske MG Barlow DH Mastering your fears and phobias: Client workbook 2006 2nd Ed. New York, NY Oxford University Press
  2. Foa EB McNally RJ Rapee M Mechanisms of change in exposure therapy Current controversies in the anxiety disorders 1996 New York, NY Guilford Press 329 343
  3. Hope DA Heimberg RG Turk CL Therapist guide for Managing social anxiety: A cognitive-behavioral therapy approach 2006 New York, NY Oxford University Press
  4. Kozak MJ Foa EB Mastery of obsessive compulsive disorder: A cognitive behavioural approach - Therapist guide 1997 New York Oxford University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meuret, A. E., Seidel, A., Rosenfield, B., Hofmann, S. G., & Rosenfield, D.
Affiliations
  • Southern Methodist University (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2012
Volume
80
Issue
5
Pages
773-785
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2012297178
Cited by
67
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01HL089761-01A1)
  • Beth and Russell Siegelman Foundation
  • National Institute of Mental Health Health (MH079236)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
fear reactivity, exposure therapy, panic disorder, agoraphobia, treatment outcome prediction, fear extinction, cognitive training, panic symptoms, anxiety, avoidance, phobic stimuli
MeSH terms
Adult, Agoraphobia, Fear, Female, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Panic Disorder, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review