Cited by 46Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchBehavioral and Psychological StudiesChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

SMARTer Approach to Personalizing Intervention for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder

Open access
Kasari, Connie, Sturm, Alexandra, Shih, Wendy·2018·Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Abstract

Purpose: This review article introduces research methods for personalization of intervention. Our goals are to review evidence-based practices for improving social communication impairment in children with autism spectrum disorder generally and then how these practices can be systematized in ways that personalize intervention, especially for children who respond slowly to an initial evidence-based practice. Method: The narrative reflects on the current status of modular and targeted interventions on social communication outcomes in the field of autism research. Questions are introduced regarding personalization of interventions that can be addressed through research methods. These research methods include adaptive treatment designs and the Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial. Examples of empirical studies using research designs are presented to answer questions of personalization. Conclusion: Bridging the gap between research studies and clinical practice can be advanced by research that attempts to answer questions pertinent to the broad heterogeneity in children with autism spectrum disorder, their response to interventions, and the fact that a single intervention is not effective for all children. Presentation Video: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.7298021

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1044/2018_jslhr-l-rsaut-18-0029

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kasari, C., Sturm, A., & Shih, W.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Published
2018-11-08
Volume
61
Issue
11
Pages
2629-2640
ISSN
  • 1092-4388 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-9102
OpenAlex
W2899666912
Cited by
46
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R13DC003383)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD073975)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, personalized interventions, social communication deficits, evidence-based practice, sequential multiple assignment randomized trial, treatment response heterogeneity, children
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Child, Communication, Humans, Early Intervention, Educational, Evidence-Based Practice, Precision Medicine, Social Skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review