Cited by 82Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Acceptance and Action Questionnaire—II scores as a predictor of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms among war veterans

Meyer, Eric C., Morissette, Sandra B., Kimbrel, Nathan A., Kruse, Marc I., Gulliver, Suzy Bird·2013·Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy

Abstract

Although much is known regarding predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), little of this knowledge directly informs treatment. This study examined whether higher scores on the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire—II (AAQ–II), a self-report measure that purportedly assesses experiential avoidance and psychological inflexibility, accounted for unique variance in PTSD symptoms compared with personality factors and other established predictors of PTSD. In addition, this study examined whether the construct measured by the AAQ–II accounts for unique variance in PTSD severity over and above the avoidance symptoms of PTSD. A sample of 109 trauma-exposed veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, approximately half of whom met current PTSD criteria on the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS), completed self-report measures of PTSD, combat exposure, perceived life threat, peritraumatic dissociation, recent life stress, perceived postdeployment social support, and personality. Higher AAQ–II scores, which indicate higher levels of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance, accounted for unique variance in PTSD symptom severity after controlling for all other predictors (small effect size [ES] on the CAPS; large ES on the self-report PTSD measure). Significant effects for AAQ–II scores remained after controlling for the avoidance symptoms of PTSD (small ES on the CAPS; medium ES on the self-report measure). Scores on the AAQ–II appears to be an important predictor of PTSD that warrants further investigation. Research should continue to examine the malleability of the constructs assessed by the AAQ–II, which may be useful targets in treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0030178

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meyer, E. C., Morissette, S. B., Kimbrel, N. A., Kruse, M. I., & Gulliver, S. B.
Affiliations
United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
Venue
Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy
Published
2013-11
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
521-528
ISSN
  • 1942-9681 (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-969X
OpenAlex
W2136340908
Cited by
82
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Department of Veterans Affairs (I01RX000304)
  • VA Office of R&D (CDA-2 1IK2CX000525-01A1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II, post-traumatic stress disorder, war veterans, experiential avoidance, psychological inflexibility, PTSD symptom severity, avoidance symptoms, Iraq and Afghanistan wars, combat exposure, peritraumatic dissociation, perceived life threat, personality factors, predictors of PTSD

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review