Cited by 217Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Retrospective revaluation in sequential decision making: a tale of two systems

Gershman, Samuel J., Markman, Arthur B., Otto, A. Ross·2014·Journal of Experimental Psychology General

Abstract

Recent computational theories of decision making in humans and animals have portrayed 2 systems locked in a battle for control of behavior. One system--variously termed model-free or habitual--favors actions that have previously led to reward, whereas a second--called the model-based or goal-directed system--favors actions that causally lead to reward according to the agent's internal model of the environment. Some evidence suggests that control can be shifted between these systems using neural or behavioral manipulations, but other evidence suggests that the systems are more intertwined than a competitive account would imply. In 4 behavioral experiments, using a retrospective revaluation design and a cognitive load manipulation, we show that human decisions are more consistent with a cooperative architecture in which the model-free system controls behavior, whereas the model-based system trains the model-free system by replaying and simulating experience.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0030844

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hierarchical Active Inference predicts that responses should fail to be contextualized and become more habitual when the system is taxed by concurrent cognitively demanding tasks.

    “For example, it predicts that responses should fail to be contextualized – and thus become more habitual – when the system is ‘taxed’ by concurrent cognitively demanding tasks, a phenomenon that has been often interpreted in terms of reinforcement learning theories (Gershman et al., 2014, Otto et al., 2013).”

    From Active Inference, homeostatic regulation and adaptive behavioural control (2015) · cites this paper as Gershman et al., 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gershman, S. J., Markman, A. B., & Otto, A. R.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology General
Published
2014
Volume
143
Issue
1
Pages
182-194
ISSN
  • 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2222
OpenAlex
W2149892666
Cited by
217
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11
FWCI
6.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Mike Hogg Endowment
  • National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
model-free learning, model-based learning, goal-directed behavior, habitual behavior, sequential decision making, retrospective revaluation, cognitive load, internal models, reinforcement learning, human decision-making
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Humans, Models, Psychological, Neuropsychological Tests, Reinforcement, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review