Cited by 109Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

The associative structure of memory for multi-element events.

Open access
Horner, Aidan J., Burgess, Neil·2013·Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Abstract

The hippocampus is thought to be an associative memory "convergence zone," binding together the multimodal elements of an experienced event into a single engram. This predicts a degree of dependency between the retrieval of the different elements comprising an event. We present data from a series of studies designed to address this prediction. Participants vividly imagined a series of person-location-object events, and memory for these events was assessed across multiple trials of cued retrieval. Consistent with the prediction, a significant level of dependency was found between the retrieval of different elements from the same event. Furthermore, the level of dependency was sensitive both to retrieval task, with higher dependency during cued recall than cued recognition, and to subjective confidence. We propose a simple model, in which events are stored as multiple pairwise associations between individual event elements, and dependency is captured by a common factor that varies across events. This factor may relate to between-events modulation of the strength of encoding, or to a process of within-event "pattern completion" at retrieval. The model predicts the quantitative pattern of dependency in the data when changes in the level of guessing with retrieval task and confidence are taken into account. Thus, we find direct behavioral support for the idea that memory for complex multimodal events depends on the pairwise associations of their constituent elements and that retrieval of the various elements corresponding to the same event reflects a common factor that varies from event to event.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0033626

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All simulations, whether remembered or imagined, vary along a continuum of associative strength determined by the prior associative history of their constituent elements.

    “I recently reformulated this hypothesis (Addis, 2018), instead proposing that all simulations -whether remembered or imagined -vary along a continuum of 'associative strength' depending on the associative history of constituent elements”

    From Mental Time Travel? A Neurocognitive Model of Event Simulation. (2020) · cites this paper as Horner & Burgess, 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kinsbourne M., & Wood F. (1975). Short-term memory processes and the amnesic syndrome In Deutsch D. & Deutsch A. J. (Eds.), Short-term memory (pp. 258– 291). New York, NY: Academic Press
  2. Yim H., Dennis S., & Sloutsky V. (2011). Development of context use and three-way binding in episodic memory In Carlson L., Holscher C., & Shipley T. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3000– 3005). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horner, A. J., & Burgess, N.
Affiliations
UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Horner, Aidan J.
  • Burgess, Neil
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Published
2013-11
Volume
142
Issue
4
Pages
1370-1383
ISSN
  • 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2222
OpenAlex
W2113641668
Cited by
109
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
associative memory, hippocampus, event memory, pairwise association, engram, cued recall, confidence, pattern completion, encoding strength
MeSH terms
Adult, Association, Cues, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Male, Memory, Mental Recall

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review