Cited by 131Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Attentional bias for nondrug reward is magnified in addiction.

Open access
Anderson, Brian A., Faulkner, Monica L., Rilee, Jessica J., Yantis, Steven, Marvel, Cherie L.·2013·Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Attentional biases for drug-related stimuli play a prominent role in addiction, predicting treatment outcomes. Attentional biases also develop for stimuli that have been paired with nondrug rewards in adults without a history of addiction, the magnitude of which is predicted by visual working-memory capacity and impulsiveness. We tested the hypothesis that addiction is associated with an increased attentional bias for nondrug (monetary) reward relative to that of healthy controls, and that this bias is related to working-memory impairments and increased impulsiveness. Seventeen patients receiving methadone-maintenance treatment for opioid dependence and 17 healthy controls participated. Impulsiveness was measured using the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11; Patton, Stanford, & Barratt, 1995), visual working-memory capacity was measured as the ability to recognize briefly presented color stimuli, and attentional bias was measured as the magnitude of response time slowing caused by irrelevant but previously reward-associated distractors in a visual-search task. The results showed that attention was biased toward the distractors across all participants, replicating previous findings. It is important to note, this bias was significantly greater in the patients than in the controls and was negatively correlated with visual working-memory capacity. Patients were also significantly more impulsive than controls as a group. Our findings demonstrate that patients in treatment for addiction experience greater difficulty ignoring stimuli associated with nondrug reward. This nonspecific reward-related bias could mediate the distracting quality of drug-related stimuli previously observed in addiction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0034575

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Anderson BA 2013 A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection Journal of Vision 13 3 7 1 16 PMC3630531 23589803
  2. Anderson BA Laurent PA Yantis S 2013 Reward predictions bias attentional selection Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7 262 PMC3678100 23781185
  3. Anderson BA Laurent PA Yantis S 2012 Generalization of value-based attentional priority Visual Cognition 20 647 658 PMC3843520 24294102
  4. Anderson BA Laurent PA Yantis S 2011a Learned value magnifies salience-based attentional capture PLoS ONE 6 e27926 PMC3221688 22132170
  5. Anderson BA Laurent PA Yantis S 2011b Value-driven attentional capture Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 108 10367 10371 PMC3121816 21646524
  6. Anderson BA Yantis S 2013 Persistence of value-driven attentional capture Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 39 6 9 PMC3989924 23181684
  7. Anderson BA Yantis S 2012 Value-driven attentional and oculomotor capture during goal-directed, unconstrained viewing Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 74 1644 1653 PMC3499680 22810561
  8. Brainard DH 1997 The psychophysics toolbox Spatial Vision 10 433 436 9176952
  9. Carpenter KM Schreiber E Church S McDowell D 2006 Drug Stroop performance: relationships with primary substance of use and treatment outcome in a drug-dependent outpatient sample Addictive Behaviors 31 174 181 15913898
  10. Czermak C Lehofer M Gasser-Steiner P Ettinger S Lemonis L Rohrhofer A Legl T Leibmann PM 2005 Test-retest reliability of a lifetime drug use questionnaire Addictive Behaviors 30 361 368 15621408
  11. Della Libera C Chelazzi L 2009 Learning to attend and to ignore is a matter of gains and losses Psychological Science 20 778 784 19422618
  12. Della Libera C Chelazzi L 2006 Visual selective attention and the effects of monetary reward Psychological Science 17 222 227 16507062
  13. Eissenberg T Stitzer ML Bigelow GE Buchhalter AR Walsh SL 1999 Relative potency of levo-alpha-acetylmethadol and methadone in humans under acute dosing conditions Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 289 936 945 10215673
  14. Fukuda K Vogel EK 2011 Individual differences in recovery time from attentional capture Psychological Science 22 361 368 PMC4494671 21310945
  15. Fukuda K Vogel EK 2009 Human variation in overriding attentional capture Journal of Neuroscience 29 8726 8733 PMC6664881 19587279
  16. Field M Mogg K Zetteler J Bradley BP 2004 Attentional biases for alcohol cues in heavy and light social drinkers: the roles of initial orienting and maintained attention Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 173 116 123 15071718
  17. First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW 1996 Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, Clinical Version (SCID-CV) Washington American Psychiatric Press
  18. Garavan H Hester R 2007 The role of cognitive control in cocaine dependence Neuropsychology Review 17 337 345 17680368
  19. Hickey C Chelazzi L Theeuwes J 2010b Reward guides vision when it’s your thing: trait reward-seeking in reward-mediated visual priming PLoS ONE 5 e14087 21124893 PMC2990710
  20. Khurana A Romer D Betancourt LM Brodsky NL Giannetta JM Hurt H 2013 Working memory ability predicts trajectories of early alcohol use in adolescents: the mediational role of impulsivity Addiction 108 506 515 PMC3568437 23033972
  21. Leathers ML Olson CR 2012 In monkeys making value-based decisions, lip neurons encode cue salience and not action value Science 338 132 135 23042897 PMC3705639
  22. Luck SJ Vogel EK 1997 The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions Nature 390 279 281 9384378
  23. Lubman DI Peters LA Mogg K Bradley BP Deakin JFW 2000 Attentional bias for drug cues in opiate dependence Psychological Medicine 30 169 175 10722187
  24. Marissen MAE Franken IHA Waters AJ Blanken P van den Brink W Hendriks VM 2006 Attentional bias predicts heroin relapse following treatment Addiction 101 1306 1312 16911730
  25. Nejati M Nejati V Mohammadi MR 2011 Selective attention and drug-related attention bias in methadone maintenance patients Acta Medica Iranica 49 814 817 22174171
  26. Nickolaou K Field M Critchley H Duka T 2013 Acute alcohol effects on attentional bias are mediated by subcortical areas associated with arousal and salience attribution Neuropsychopharmacology 38 1365 1373 PMC3656379 23361162
  27. Nickolaou K Field M Duka T 2013 Alcohol-related cues reduce cognitive control in social drinkers Behavioral Pharmacology 24 29 36 23238087
  28. Papachristou H Nederkoorn C Havermans R van der Horst M Jansen A 2012 Can’t stop the craving: the effect of impulsivity on cue-elicited craving for alcohol in heavy and light social drinkers Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 219 511 518 PMC3249167 21384105
  29. Patton JH Stanford MS Barratt ES 1995 Factor structure of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale Journal of Clinical Psychology 51 768 774 8778124
  30. Peck CJ Jangraw DC Suzuki M Efem R Gottlieb J 2009 Reward modulates attention independently of action value in posterior parietal cortex Journal of Neuroscience 29 11182 11191 19741125 PMC2778240
  31. Raymond JE O’Brien JL 2009 Selective visual attention and motivation: the consequences of value learning in an attentional blink task Psychological Science 20 981 988 19549080
  32. Serences JT 2008 Value-based modulations in human visual cortex Neuron 60 1169 1181 PMC3384552 19109919
  33. Stromark KM Field NP Hugdahl K Horowitz M 1997 Selective processing of visual alcohol cues in abstinent alcoholics: an approach-avoidance conflict? Addictive Behaviors 22 509 519 9290860
  34. Tompkins DA Bigelow GE Harrison JA Johnson RE Fudala PJ Strain EC 2009 Concurrent validation of the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) and single-item indices against the Clinical Institute Narcotic Assessment (CINA) opioid withdrawal instrument Drug and Alcohol Dependence 105 154 159 PMC2774236 19647958
  35. Townshend JM Duka T 2001 Attentional bias associated with alcohol cues: Differences between heavy and occasional social drinkers Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 157 67 74 11512045
  36. Townsend L Flisher AJ King G 2007 A systematic review of the relationship between high school dropout and substance use Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 10 295 317 17636403
  37. Walsh SL Preston KL Stitzer ML Cone EJ Bigelow GE 1994 Clinical pharmacology of buprenorphine: ceiling effects at high doses Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 55 569 580 8181201
  38. Wesson DR Ling W 2003 The Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 35 253 259 12924748

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, B. A., Faulkner, M. L., Rilee, J. J., Yantis, S., & Marvel, C. L.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
2013
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
499-506
ISSN
  • 1064-1297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-2293
OpenAlex
W2063712765
Cited by
131
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12
FWCI
8.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
United States Department of Health and Human Services (R01-DA013165, K01-DA030442, F31-DA033754)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
attentional bias, monetary rewards, addiction, opioid use disorder, methadone maintenance treatment, visual working memory, impulsivity, visual search
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Methadone, Opioid-Related Disorders, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Reward, Behavior, Addictive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review