Cited by 11Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesVisual perception and processing mechanismsVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Reward-based plasticity of spatial priority maps: Exploiting inter-subject variability to probe the underlying neurobiology

Della Libera, Chiara, Calletti, Riccardo, Eštočinová, Jana, Chelazzi, Leonardo, Santandrea, Elisa·2017·Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Recent evidence indicates that the attentional priority of objects and locations is altered by the controlled delivery of reward, reflecting reward-based attentional learning. Here, we take an approach hinging on intersubject variability to probe the neurobiological bases of the reward-driven plasticity of spatial priority maps. Specifically, we ask whether an individual's susceptibility to the reward-based treatment can be accounted for by specific predictors, notably personality traits that are linked to reward processing (along with more general personality traits), but also gender. Using a visual search protocol, we show that when different target locations are associated with unequal reward probability, different priorities are acquired by the more rewarded relative to the less rewarded locations. However, while males exhibit the expected pattern of results, with greater priority for locations associated with higher reward, females show an opposite trend. Critically, both the extent and the direction of reward-based adjustments are further predicted by personality traits indexing reward sensitivity, indicating that not only male and female brains are differentially sensitive to reward, but also that specific personality traits further contribute to shaping their learning-dependent attentional plasticity. These results contribute to a better understanding of the neurobiology underlying reward-dependent attentional learning and cross-subject variability in this domain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17588928.2016.1213226

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Males demonstrate greater priority for reward-associated locations than females.

    “males demonstrate greater priority for reward-associated locations than females (Della Libera, Calletti, Eštočinová, Chelazzi, & Santandrea, 2017).”

    From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Della Libera, Calletti, Eštočinová, Chelazzi, & Santandrea, 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 92 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Della Libera, C., Calletti, R., Eštočinová, J., Chelazzi, L., & Santandrea, E.
Affiliations
  • Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
  • University of Verona (IT)
Corresponding author
Chelazzi, Leonardo
Venue
Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2016-08
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
85-101
ISSN
  • 1758-8928 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-8936
OpenAlex
W2468105341
Cited by
11
References
92
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Università degli Studi di Verona
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
reward sensitivity, personality traits, gender differences, visual search, location-based attention, interindividual variability
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Neuronal Plasticity, Personality, Reward, Sex Factors, Space Perception, Visual Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review