Cited by 65Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The attribution of value-based attentional priority in individuals with depressive symptoms

Open access
Anderson, Brian A., Leal, Stephanie L., Hall, Michelle G., Yassa, Michael A., Yantis, Steven·2014·Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

The capture of attention by stimuli previously associated with reward has been demonstrated across a wide range of studies. Such value-based attentional priority appears to be robust, and cases where reward feedback fails to modulate subsequent attention have not been reported. However, individuals differ in their sensitivity to external rewards, and such sensitivity is abnormally blunted in depression. Here, we show that depressive symptomology is accompanied by insensitivity to value-based attentional bias. We replicate attentional capture by stimuli previously associated with reward in a control sample and show that these same reward-related stimuli do not capture attention in individuals experiencing symptoms of depression. This sharp contrast in performance indicates that value-based attentional biases depend on the normal functioning of the brain's reward system and suggests that a failure to preferentially attend to reward-related information may play a role in the experience of depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/s13415-014-0301-z

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Depressed patients exhibit blunted VDAC.

    “while depressed patients exhibit blunted VDAC (Anderson, Leal, et al., 2014)”

    From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Anderson, Leal, et al., 2014

    The Discussion reports that individuals experiencing depressive symptoms largely ignored previously high-value stimuli, supporting blunted value-driven attentional capture. However, the Methods identify the participants as undergraduates, and the Discussion cautions that they did not necessarily meet diagnostic criteria for clinical depression; the finding therefore does not establish it for depressed patients. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Neuronal activity in the striatum was elevated in response to distractors previously associated with high reward, relative to when previously reward-associated distractors were absent.

    “In one fMRI study, neuronal activity in the striatum was observed to be elevated in response to distractors that were previously associated with high reward, relative to when previously reward-associated distractors were absent (Anderson, Leal, et al., 2014).”

    From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Anderson, Leal, et al., 2014

    The Methods and Results (Test Phase; page unavailable) compare high-value distractor trials with distractor-absent trials, but report response times, not striatal activity. A search of our copy for fMRI and striatal or neural activity found no passage reporting the claimed brain-activity difference. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Neuronal activity in response to stimuli imbued with reward history is elevated along the visual hierarchy as early as (extra)striate cortex.

    “These changes are reflected in modulations of neuronal firing such that neuronal activity in response to stimuli imbued with reward history is elevated along the visual hierarchy as early as (extra)striate cortex (e.g., Anderson, 2016b; Anderson, Leal, et al., 2014; Hickey et al., 2010a; Seitz et al., 2009; Serences, 2008; Serences & Saproo, 2010).”

    From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Anderson, Leal, et al., 2014

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that reward-associated stimuli captured attention in controls but were largely ignored by participants with depressive symptoms. The Methods describe behavioral tasks, not measurements of neuronal firing. Searches for extrastriate cortex, the visual hierarchy, and neural responses found no passage in our copy establishing the claimed elevation in neuronal activity. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Reward-based selection history has also been reflected in activity of brain areas traditionally associated with attention, such as the OSC and IPS.

    “Reward-based selection history has also been reflected in activity of brain areas traditionally associated with attention, such as the OSC and IPS (Anderson, Leal, et al., 2014; Hickey & Peelen, 2015; Peck et al., 2009).”

    From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Anderson, Leal, et al., 2014

    The Discussion reports that reward history affected attentional capture in controls but had little apparent effect in participants with depressive symptoms. It does not report activity in the OSC or IPS; searches for those regions and for neural activity found no passage supporting the claim. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, B. A., Leal, S. L., Hall, M. G., Yassa, M. A., & Yantis, S.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Anderson, Brian A.
Venue
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2014-05-30
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
1221-1227
ISSN
  • 1530-7026 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-135X
OpenAlex
W2000027240
Cited by
65
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (T32AG027668)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA013165, F31DA033754)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
attentional capture, reward, depression, depressive symptoms, reward sensitivity, reward systems, attentional bias
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Attention, Choice Behavior, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Photic Stimulation, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Reaction Time, Reward, Bias, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review