Cited by 77Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsEthics in Clinical Research

The registration continuum in clinical science: A guide toward transparent practices

Open access
Benning, Stephen D., Bachrach, Rachel L., Smith, Edward A., Freeman, Andrew J., Wright, Aidan G. C.·2019·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

Clinical scientists can use a continuum of registration efforts that vary in their disclosure and timing relative to data collection and analysis. Broadly speaking, registration benefits investigators by offering stronger, more powerful tests of theory with particular methods in tandem with better control of long-run false positive error rates. Registration helps clinical researchers in thinking through tensions between bandwidth and fidelity that surround recruiting participants, defining clinical phenotypes, handling comorbidity, treating missing data, and analyzing rich and complex data. In particular, registration helps record and justify the reasons behind specific study design decisions, though it also provides the opportunity to register entire decision trees with specific endpoints. Creating ever more faithful registrations and standard operating procedures may offer alternative methods of judging a clinical investigator's scientific skill and eminence because study registration increases the transparency of clinical researchers' work. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/abn0000451

Cites

63 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preregistration practices range on a spectrum from preregistration before data collection to co-registration during data collection to postregistration after data collection but before analysis.

    “Preregistration practices occur on a spectrum (Benning et al., 2019), ranging from preregistering a study before data collection ever begins (as often occurs on clinicaltrials.gov)to co-registration (registering analyses during data collection) to postregistration (registering specific analyses after the data have been collected but before the data are analyzed).”

    From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Processes and Mediation: Challenges and How to Address Them (2023) · cites this paper as Benning et al., 2019

    In “Time of registration relative to data collection and analysis” (page not provided), the paper defines preregistration as occurring before data collection and coregistration as occurring during collection, supporting the first two stages. It defines postregistration as registration after data have previously been analyzed for other research questions, not necessarily before the data are analyzed at all. A postregistration may precede specific follow-up analyses, but the citing sentence omits that distinction. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benning, S. D., Bachrach, R. L., Smith, E. A., Freeman, A. J., & Wright, A. G. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
  • VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2019-08
Volume
128
Issue
6
Pages
528-540
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2956054558
Cited by
77
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4
FWCI
6.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (L30 MH101760)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
Keywords
clinical trial registration, research transparency, false positive rate, participant recruitment, clinical phenotype, comorbidities, missing data, decision tree, standard operating procedures, clinical research
MeSH terms
Humans, Psychology, Clinical, Research Design, Research Personnel, Guidelines as Topic, Disclosure, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review