Cited by 62Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild Development and Digital Technology

Adolescents’ real-time social and affective experiences of online and face-to-face interactions

Open access
Achterhof, Robin, Kirtley, Olivia J., Schneider, Maude, Hagemann, Noëmi, Hermans, Karlijn S.F.M., Hiekkaranta, Anu P., Lecei, Aleksandra, Lafit, Ginette +1 more·2022·Computers in Human Behavior

Abstract

Much disagreement exists surrounding the relationship between digital communication and adolescent well-being. Micro-level insight into the direct effect of online interaction on affective experiences in daily life is crucial to advancing this discussion. In this registered study, we used experience sampling in 1705 general-population adolescents (n = 43.226 total observations) to examine different emotional and social experiences, at the moment they engage in online and face-to-face social interactions. Adolescents reported significantly less positive affect when alone compared to when interacting online (B(SE)=-.15(.04), p=.001), but significantly more positive affect (B(SE)=.12(.04), p<.001) and less negative affect (B(SE)=-.12(.03), p<.001) and loneliness (B(SE)=-.65(.05), p<.001) when interacting face-to-face compared to online. Exploratory moderator analyses do not support the hypothesis that those with more social support experience greater benefits from online interaction. This study uniquely highlights both the momentary affective benefits and potential disadvantages of online interaction, thereby bringing clarification and nuance to this highly contentious topic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107159

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adolescents with difficulties in face-to-face social interaction often seek to compensate in digital environments, generating a higher risk of being contacted by groomers.

    “Likewise, adolescents with difficulties in face-to-face social interaction often seek to compensate for these limitations in digital environments [28], where they can better control how they present themselves and avoid the stress associated with face-to-face interactions [29], thus generating a higher risk of being contacted by the groomers [27].”

    From Grooming Risk Factors in Adolescents with Abuse Histories: Insights from Chilean Reparative Programs (2025) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes social compensation as a hypothesis: people with fewer social resources may be more comfortable interacting online than face-to-face. But the Discussion reports no strong support for that hypothesis, so the paper does not establish that adolescents with face-to-face difficulties often seek online interaction to compensate. The groomer-risk clause is cited to [27], not this paper. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Jacobson, N. C. (2020). Compliance thresholds in intensive longitudinal data: Worse than listwise deletion: Call for action [Symposium]. Society for Ambulatory Assessment Conference, Melbourne, Australia. http://www.nicholasjacobson.com/files/talks/SAA2020_Compliance_Thresholds.pdf
  2. Odgers, C. L., & Jensen, M. R. (2020b). Annual Research Review: Adolescent mental health in the digital age: facts, fears, and future directions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 61(3), 336-348. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13190 · DOI · Paper page
  3. van Sonderen, E (2012). Het meten van sociale steun met de Sociale Steun Lijst -Interacties (SSL-I) en Sociale Steun Lijst -Discrepanties (SSL-D): Een handleiding. (2nd ed.). UMCG / Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Research Institute SHARE.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Achterhof, R., Kirtley, O. J., Schneider, M., Hagemann, N., Hermans, K. S. F. M., Hiekkaranta, A. P., Lecei, A., Lafit, G., & Myin-Germeys, I.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Achterhof, Robin
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-04
Volume
129
Pages
107159
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4226089730
Cited by
62
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3
FWCI
12.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (174206)
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (FWO G08416N, 1104219N, G08416N, FWO 1257821 N, G049219N, 1257821N)
  • Vlaamse regering
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
adolescents, online interaction, face-to-face interaction, emotional experience, positive affect, negative affect, loneliness, social support, digital communication, youth welfare, social interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review