Cited by 74Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesBehavioral Health and Interventions

Evaluating the temporal relationships between withdrawal symptoms and smoking relapse.

Open access
Robinson, Jason D., Li, Liang, Chen, Minxing, Lerman, Caryn, Tyndale, Rachel F., Schnoll, Robert A., Hawk, Larry W., George, Tony P. +2 more·2019·Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

Abstract

Smokers attempting to quit often attribute smoking relapse to negative affect, craving, and other nicotine withdrawal symptoms. In addition, there is evidence that smoking relapse can increase these symptoms, particularly negative affect. To address this issue, we analyzed data from an 11-week smoking cessation clinical trial in which smokers (n = 1,246) were randomized to receive either nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), varenicline, or placebo, combined with behavioral counseling. Using cross-lagged analyses, we examined the temporal bidirectional relationships between self-reported measures of affect, craving, and composite withdrawal symptoms and biochemically verified smoking abstinence. The relative strength of these temporal relationships was examined by comparing the explained variances of the models. The results showed that higher negative affect, craving, and composite withdrawal symptoms increased the likelihood of subsequent smoking relapse, and that smoking relapse led to subsequent increases in these same symptoms. A comparison of the explained variances found symptom predicting subsequent relapse models to be stronger than those where relapse predicted subsequent symptoms. Although the explained variance findings generally support a negative reinforcement conceptualization of nicotine dependence, the bidirectional relationship between symptoms and smoking relapse suggests that struggling with quitting smoking leads to significant negative affect, craving, and other withdrawal symptoms that do not quickly resolve. These findings highlight the importance of addressing specific symptoms within the context of smoking cessation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/adb0000434

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Relapse is the most common and probable event in the smoking cessation process.

    “Relapse is the most common and probable event in the smoking cessation process [10, 11].”

    From Relapse prevention among Iranian people who smoke through cognitive behavioral intervention: application of Marlatt’s model (2025) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Results (Descriptive statistics of the study sample; page unavailable) say abstinence declined after treatment, but do not establish that relapse was the most common or most probable outcome. Searches for a majority relapsing and for relapse or abstinence rates found no passage in our copy supporting that comparison. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Allison PD (2014). Measures of Fit for Logistic Regression. SUGI Proceedings, 14 Retrieved from https://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings14/1485-2014.pdf
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.
  3. Marlatt GA (1985). Relapse prevention: Theoretical rationale and overview of the model In Marlatt G & Gordon J (Eds.), Relapse prevention: Maintenance strategies in the treatment of addictive behaviors (pp. 3– 70). New York: Guilford Press.
  4. McFadden D (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior In Zarembka P (Ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics (pp. 105– 142). New York: Academic Press.
  5. Piasecki TM, Kenford SL, Smith SS, Fiore MC, & Baker TB (1997). Listening to nicotine: Negative affect and the smoking withdrawal conundrum. Psychological Science, 8(3), 184– 189.
  6. Shiffman S (1979). The tobacco withdrawal syndrome In Krasnegor N (Ed.), Cigarette Smoking as a Dependence Process (pp. 158– 184). Rockville, Maryland: National Institute on Drug Abuse, United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
  7. Stone AA, & Shiffman S (1994). Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) in behavioral medicine. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 16(3), 199– 202.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robinson, J. D., Li, L., Chen, M., Lerman, C., Tyndale, R. F., Schnoll, R. A., Hawk, L. W., George, T. P., Benowitz, N. L., & Cinciripini, P. M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
Published
2019-03
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
105-116
ISSN
  • 0893-164X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1501
OpenAlex
W2909063800
Cited by
74
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (U01DA20830)
  • MD Anderson’s Cancer Center (P30CA016672)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
smoking relapse, nicotine withdrawal symptoms, negative affect, nicotine craving, smoking cessation, nicotine replacement therapy, varenicline, negative reinforcement, nicotine dependence, temporal dynamics
MeSH terms
Varenicline, Smoking Cessation Agents, Adult, Combined Modality Therapy, Counseling, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Reinforcement, Psychology, Smoking, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Tobacco Use Disorder, Smoking Cessation, Tobacco Use Cessation Devices, Craving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review