Cited by 449Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Symptoms of Tobacco Withdrawal: A Replication and Extension

Hughes, John R.·1991·Archives of General Psychiatry

Abstract

Smokers (n = 315) who wished to quit were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to groups using either nicotine or placebo gum. Self-reported and observed symptoms of tobacco withdrawal were collected before cessation and at follow-ups of 1 to 2 weeks, 1 month, and 6 months. Self-reported and/or observed anger, anxiety, craving, difficulty concentrating, hunger, impatience, and restlessness were the most prominent symptoms of tobacco withdrawal. These symptoms had returned to precessation levels by 1 month except increased weight, hunger, and craving continued for 6 months in many smokers. Nicotine gum decreased most symptoms, including craving and hunger but not weight. Abstinent smokers with more intense withdrawal were not more likely to relapse. Abstinent smokers who gained more weight were less likely to relapse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpsyc.1991.01810250054007

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nicotine withdrawal symptoms typically peak within the first week and taper over 3-4 weeks, though some reports say they subside within 10 days and others say they persist past 31 days.

    “Nicotine withdrawal symptoms are typically reported to reach a peak within the first week of abstinence and taper off for the next 3–4 weeks [119, 124]. However, some reports indicate that symptoms can subside within 10 days [125], while others indicate that withdrawal symptoms may persist past 31 days [126, 127].”

    From Mechanistic insights into nicotine withdrawal (2011) · cites this paper as [124]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hughes, J. R.
Affiliations
University of Vermont (US)
Corresponding author
Hughes, John R.
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Published
1991-01-01
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
52
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2098475441
Cited by
449
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01da004066-04)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA-03728, DA-0298, DA-04066)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
nicotine withdrawal, nicotine gum, smoking cessation, nicotine replacement therapy, craving, hunger, weight gain, relapse, anger, anxiety, restlessness, concentration difficulties
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Adult, Chewing Gum, Female, Humans, Hunger, Male, Nicotine, Placebos, Polymethacrylic Acids, Polyvinyls, Smoking, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Weight Gain, Substance-Related Disorders, Tobacco Use Cessation Devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review