Cited by 759Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentBehavioral Health and Interventions

Self-regulation in childhood as a predictor of future outcomes: A meta-analytic review.

Robson, Davina A., Allen, Mark S., Howard, Steven J.·2020·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

This meta-analysis explores whether self-regulation in childhood relates to concurrent and subsequent levels of achievement, interpersonal behaviors, mental health, and healthy living. A comprehensive literature search identified 150 studies that met inclusion criteria (745 effect sizes; total n = 215,212). Data were analyzed using inverse-variance weighted random effects meta-analysis. Mean effect sizes from 55 meta-analyses provided evidence that self-regulation relates to 25 discrete outcomes. Results showed that self-regulation in preschool (∼age 4) was positively associated with social competency, school engagement, and academic performance, and negatively associated with internalizing problems, peer victimization, and externalizing problems, in early school years (∼age 8). Self-regulation in early school years was positively related to academic achievement (math and literacy), and negatively related to externalizing problems (aggressive and criminal behavior), depressive symptoms, obesity, cigarette smoking and illicit drug use, in later school years (∼age 13). Results also showed that self-regulation in early school years was negatively related to unemployment, aggressive and criminal behavior, depression and anxiety, obesity, cigarette smoking, alcohol and substance abuse, and symptoms of physical illness in adulthood (∼age 38). Random effects metaregression identified self-regulation measurement as the most important moderator of pooled mean effects, with task-based…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/bul0000227

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robson, D. A., Allen, M. S., & Howard, S. J.
Affiliations
University of Wollongong (AU)
Corresponding author
Allen, Mark S.
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
2020-04
Volume
146
Issue
4
Pages
324-354
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W3000181952
Cited by
759
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 129 · 2025: 153 · 2024: 166 · 2023: 112 · 2022: 115 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 1
FWCI
30.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
self-regulation, childhood, academic performance, social competence, school engagement, internalizing problems, externalizing problems, peer victimization, depressive symptoms, obesity, substance use, smoking, unemployment, mental health, healthy living, longitudinal prediction, task-based assessment, parent report
MeSH terms
Criminal Behavior, Self-Control, Cigarette Smoking, Academic Performance, Achievement, Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Child, Depression, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Mental Health, Obesity, Peer Group, Schools, Unemployment, Substance-Related Disorders, Bullying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review