Cited by 73Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Does practice quality mediate the relationship between practice time and outcome in mindfulness-based stress reduction?

Open access
Goldberg, Simon B., Knoeppel, Cara, Davidson, Richard J., Flook, Lisa·2020·Journal of Counseling Psychology

Abstract

= .879). In multilevel mediation models, improved practice quality mediated the link between practice time and changes in self-report mindfulness, suggesting improved practice quality functions as a mechanism linking practice time and outcome in MBSR. Future research evaluating practice quality in clinical samples, in tandem with intensive sampling paradigms (e.g., experience sampling) and objective (behavioral, physiological) outcomes may be warranted. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/cou0000369

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Fox J & Weisberg S (2011). An R companion to applied regression (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
  2. Kabat-Zinn J (2013). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness (Revised ed.). New York: Random House.
  3. Lovibond SH & Lovibond PF (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (2nd. ed.). Sydney, Australia: Psychology Foundation.
  4. Snijders TA & Bosker RJ (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advance multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
  5. Tingley D, Yamamoto T, Hirose K, Keele L, & Imai K (2014). mediation: R package for causal mediation analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 59(5), 1– 38.26917999

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldberg, S. B., Knoeppel, C., Davidson, R. J., & Flook, L.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Journal of Counseling Psychology
Published
2020-01
Volume
67
Issue
1
Pages
115-122
ISSN
  • 0022-0167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2168
OpenAlex
W2964052381
Cited by
73
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6
FWCI
8.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Counseling Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • MindRxiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • MindRxiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
  • National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (P01AT004952)
  • Mind and Life Institute
  • Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
mindfulness-based stress reduction, quality of practice, practice time, mediation, multilevel mediation, mindfulness-based interventions
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome, Negotiating, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review