Cited by 34Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Meditation, mindfulness, and acceptance methods in psychotherapy: A systematic review

Open access
Goldberg, Simon B., Anders, Christopher, Stuart-Maver, Shannon L., Kivlighan, D. Martin·2023·Psychotherapy Research

Abstract

Objective: Meditation, mindfulness, and acceptance (MMA) methods have gained popularity among psychotherapists and the public. The impact of these strategies as implemented in treatment packages (e.g., mindfulness-based interventions) has been studied extensively. However, the impact of integrating MMA strategies into individual psychotherapy has not been established.Methods: To address this gap in the literature, we conducted a systematic review of empirical (quantitative or qualitative) studies investigating the use of MMA methods during individual psychotherapy in adult samples.Results: After reviewing 4671 references, only three studies (one quantitative, two qualitative) met our inclusion criteria. The one experimental study (n = 162) provided no evidence that including mindfulness meditation improved outcomes beyond other active interventions (ds = 0.00–0.12 for effects on general clinical symptoms vs. progressive muscle relaxation and treatment-as-usual, respectively). Two qualitative studies (n = 5 therapist-patient dyads in one study, n = 9 adults in one study) provided preliminary evidence that patients may find MMA methods helpful.Conclusions: We highlight future directions for work in this area, including clarifying optimal dosage and timing, identifying patient characteristics associated with beneficial or adverse effects, investigating cultural adaptations, and clarifying how MMA constructs can be measured within individual psychotherapy. We conclude by highlighting training recommendations and therapeutic practices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10503307.2023.2209694

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Manualized group settings incorporate many components contributing to their observed clinical benefits.

    “These settings incorporate many components contributing to their observed clinical benefits [46–49].”

    From Emotion Regulation as a Mechanism of Mindfulness in Individual Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Depression and Anxiety Disorders (2024) · cites this paper as [49]

    The Definitions and Clinical Description section (page not provided) says group settings have elements that may make these methods helpful and that DBT includes ingredients beyond acceptance. The Distal Outcomes of Treatment Packages section reports clinical benefits. The review does not establish that the various components contributed to those observed benefits; it presents the group-setting contribution as a possibility. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A significant gap persists in understanding the effects of mindfulness interventions on therapeutic outcomes when embedded in individual CBT sessions.

    “a significant gap persists in understanding the effects of mindfulness interventions on therapeutic outcomes when embedded in individual CBT sessions [46, 49, 51].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. cou0000032 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldberg, S. B., Anders, C., Stuart-Maver, S. L., & Kivlighan, D. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Goldberg, Simon B.
Venue
Psychotherapy Research
Published
2023-05-08
Volume
33
Issue
7
Pages
873-885
ISSN
  • 1050-3307 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4381
OpenAlex
W4375853448
Cited by
34
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychotherapy Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Center for Complementary & Integrative Health of the National Institutes of Health (K23AT010879)
  • Hope for Depression Research Foundation (Defeating Depression Award)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
meditation, mindfulness, acceptance and commitment therapy, individual psychotherapy, mindfulness-based interventions, psychotherapy integration, clinical outcomes, therapist training, patient experience
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Psychotherapy, Meditation, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review