Was that a threat? Attentional biases by signals of threat.
Open accessAbstract
The present study rigorously tests whether an arbitrary stimulus that signals threat affects attentional selection and perception. Thirty-four volunteers completed a spatial-emotional cueing paradigm to examine how perceptual sensitivity (d') and response times (RTs) were affected by a threatening stimulus. On each side of fixation, 2 colored circles were presented as cues, followed by 2 Gabor patches, 1 of which was tilted and served as target. The color of 1 of the cues was paired with an electric shock, while others remained neutral. The target could be presented at the location of the threat-associated cue (Valid), at the opposite side (Invalid), or following neutral cues. Stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between cue and target was either 100 ms or 1,000 ms. Results showed increased perceptual sensitivity (d') and faster RTs for targets appearing at the Valid location relative to the Invalidly cued location, suggesting that immediately after cue presentation, attention was captured by the threat-associated cue. Crucially, following this initial exogenous capture, there was also enhanced perceptual sensitivity at the long SOA, suggesting that attention lingered volitionally at the location that previously contained the threat-associated stimulus. The current results show an effect of threatening stimuli on perceptual sensitivity, providing unequivocal evidence that threatening stimuli modulate the efficacy of sensory processing. (PsycINFO Database Record
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Cites
Brainard, D. H. (1997) · Spatial Vision · doi:10.1163/156856897x00357 · Cited by 19,308 · see citing works
The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies
Pelli, D. G. (1997) · Spatial Vision · doi:10.1163/156856897x00366 · Cited by 11,110 · see citing works
Posner, M. I. (1980) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/00335558008248231 · Cited by 9,670 · see citing works
Constants across cultures in the face and emotion.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1971) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0030377 · Cited by 5,509 · see citing works
Detection theory: A user's guide
Lories, G. (1993) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/0376-6357(93)90083-4 · Cited by 2,927 · see citing works
Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method
Watson, A. B., & Pelli, D. G. (1983) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03202828 · Cited by 2,398 · see citing works
How brains beware: neural mechanisms of emotional attention
Vuilleumier, P. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.10.011 · Cited by 2,162 · see citing works
Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005)
Morey, R. D. (2008) · Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology · doi:10.20982/tqmp.04.2.p061 · Cited by 2,118 · see citing works
Klein, R. M. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01452-2 · Cited by 2,017 · see citing works
Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy
Awh, E., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010 · Cited by 1,557 · see citing works
Self-citationDo threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety?
Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.681 · Cited by 1,469 · see citing works
The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze
Friesen, C. K., & Kingstone, A. F. (1998) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03208827 · Cited by 1,336 · see citing works
Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics
Wickelgren, W. A. (1977) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(77)90012-9 · Cited by 1,304 · see citing works
Detection theory: A user's guide, 2nd ed.
Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005) · Cited by 1,117 · see citing works
Emotion Facilitates Perception and Potentiates the Perceptual Benefits of Attention
Phelps, E. A., Ling, S., & Carrasco, M. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01701.x · Cited by 815 · see citing works
Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets
Theeuwes, J. (1991) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03211619 · Cited by 814 · see citing works
Self-citationHuman Amygdala Responsivity to Masked Fearful Eye Whites
Whalen, P. J., Kagan, J., Cook, R. G., Davis, F. C., Kim, H., Polis, S., McLaren, D. G., Somerville, L. H., McLean, A. A., Maxwell, J. S., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1103617 · Cited by 766 · see citing works
A cognitive model of selective processing in anxiety
Mathews, A., & Mackintosh, B. (1998) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1023/a:1018738019346 · Cited by 756 · see citing works
Koster, E. H. W., Crombez, G., Verschuere, B., & De Houwer, J. (2004) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2003.08.001 · Cited by 709 · see citing works
Brain mechanisms for emotional influences on perception and attention: What is magic and what is not
Pourtois, G., Schettino, A., & Vuilleumier, P. (2013) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.02.007 · Cited by 687 · see citing works
Reflexive Visual Orienting in Response to the Social Attention of Others
Langton, S., & Bruce, V. (1999) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/135062899394939 · Cited by 579 · see citing works
ERP Correlates of Feedback and Reward Processing in the Presence and Absence of Response Choice
Yeung, N., Holroyd, C. B., & Cohen, J. D. (2005) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh153 · Cited by 520 · see citing works
On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture.
Yantis, S., & Egeth, H. E. (1999) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.25.3.661 · Cited by 473 · see citing works
Involuntary orienting to sound improves visual perception
McDonald, J. J., Teder-Sälejärvi, W. A., & Hillyard, S. A. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35038085 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
Visual attention modulates signal detectability.
Hawkins, H. L., Hillyard, S. A., Luck, S. J., Mouloua, M., Downing, C. J., & Woodward, D. P. (1990) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.16.4.802 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information processing
Carrasco, M., & Brian Mcelree, A. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.081074098 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (1999) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(98)00158-2 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Kahneman, D. J., Treisman, A., & Burkell, J. (1983) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.9.4.510 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Visual attention modulates signal detectability.
Hawkins, H. L., Hillyard, S. A., Luck, S. J., et al. (1990) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.16.4.802 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Silvestri, C., Motro, R., & Dresp, B. (2007) · Perception · doi:10.1177/03010066070360s101 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Performance Feedback Drives Caudate Activation in a Phonological Learning Task
Tricomi, E. M., Delgado, M. R., McCandliss, B. D., McClelland, J. L., & Fiez, J. A. (2006) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.6.1029 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Attentional capture by signals of threat
Schmidt, L. J., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2015) · Cognition and Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2014.924484 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Self-citationAbrupt luminance change pops out; abrupt color change does not
Theeuwes, J. (1995) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03213269 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Self-citationAllocation of spatial attention to emotional stimuli depends upon arousal and not valence.
Vogt, J., Houwer, J. D., Koster, E. H. W., Damme, S. V., & Crombez, G. (2008) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0013981 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Kahneman, D. J., Treisman, A., & Burkell, J. (1983) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.9.4.510 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Exogenous visual orienting by reward
Failing, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2014) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/14.5.6 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Self-citationSignals of threat do not capture, but prioritize, attention: A conditioning approach.
Notebaert, L., Crombez, G., Van Damme, S., De Houwer, J., & Theeuwes, J. (2011) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0021286 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Self-citationSpatial distribution of visual attention: Perceptual sensitivity and response latency
Handy, T. C., Kingstone, A. F., & Mangun, G. R. (1996) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03213094 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
The role of spatial and nonspatial information in visual selection.
Theeuwes, J., & der Burg, E. V. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1335 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Self-citationBelopolsky, A. V., Devue, C., & Theeuwes, J. (2010) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506285.2010.536186 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Self-citationSoares, S. C., Esteves, F. G., Lundqvist, D., & Öhman, A. (2009) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2009.07.022 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Emotion-induced trade-offs in spatiotemporal vision.
Bocanegra, B. R., & Zeelenberg, R. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0023188 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Motivation and attention: Incongruent effects of feedback on the processing of valence.
Rothermund, K. (2003) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.3.3.223 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Attentional capture and inhibition (of return): The effect on perceptual sensitivity
Theeuwes, J., & Chen, C. Y. D. (2005) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03193636 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Self-citationAttentional bias to threat: A perceptual accuracy approach.
Van Damme, S., Crombez, G., & Notebaert, L. (2008) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0014149 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Sheppes, G., Luria, R., Fukuda, K., & Gross, J. J. (2013) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0031236 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Reward can modulate attentional capture, independent of top-down set
Munneke, J., Hoppenbrouwers, S. S., & Theeuwes, J. (2015) · Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-015-0958-6 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationEmotional cues enhance the attentional effects on spatial and temporal resolution
Bocanegra, B. R., & Zeelenberg, R. (2011) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0156-z · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Anxiety modulates the effects of emotion and attention on early vision
Ferneyhough, E., Kim, M. K., Phelps, E. A., & Carrasco, M. (2012) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2012.689953 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
The role of fear and expectancies in capture of covert attention by spiders.
Devue, C., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2011) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0023418 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationThe time course of attentional bias to cues of threat and safety
Schmidt, L. J., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2016) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2016.1169998 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention.
Failing, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2018) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1380-y · Cited by 345 · see citing works
“Other studies showed that after the association with an aversive event, initially neutral cues caused both facilitated attentional engagement (Koster, Crombez, van Damme, Verschuere, & de Houwer, 2004) and delayed disengagement (Preciado et al., 2017; van Damme, Crombez, & Notebaert, 2008).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
- Authors
- Preciado, D., Munneke, J., & Theeuwes, J.
- Affiliations
- Bilkent University (TR)
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Venue
- Emotion
- Published
- 2017-04
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 478-486
- ISSN
- 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-1516
- OpenAlex
- W2554279063
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 1.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.vu.nl
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Emotion (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- ERC (ERC-2012-AdG – 323413)
- TUBITAK-BIDEB (2221)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- threat signals, attentional bias, spatial cueing, perceptual sensitivity, reaction time (psychology), stimulus onset asynchrony, attentional capture, emotional arousal, sensory processing
- MeSH terms
- Attentional Bias, Adult, Attention, Cues, Electric Stimulation, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
