Cited by 520Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFree Will and AgencyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

ERP Correlates of Feedback and Reward Processing in the Presence and Absence of Response Choice

Yeung, Nick, Holroyd, Clay B., Cohen, Jonathan D.·2005·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

The feedback negativity is a component of the event-related brain potential that is elicited by feedback stimuli associated with unfavorable outcomes. The present research investigated whether this component reflects an evaluation of the valence of experienced outcomes or a process of learning about actions that led to those outcomes. The latter hypothesis predicts that the feedback negativity should be observed only when negative outcomes are experienced in relation to executed actions. Contrary to this prediction, feedback negativities were observed in simple monetary gambling tasks in which participants made no active choices (experiment 1) and no overt actions (experiment 2). However, the amplitude of the component was reduced in these tasks relative to a gambling task in which the outcomes appeared to be contingent upon participants' response choices. This reduction was correlated with changes in participants' subjective ratings of involvement in the tasks, suggesting that the evaluative process indexed by the feedback negativity is sensitive to the motivational significance of ongoing events.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhh153

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both P3 and FRN are influenced by an individual's task engagement, so that larger amplitudes result from active goal-directed responding to achieve a reward compared with the passive receipt of a reward.

    “Moreover, both components are influenced by an individual’s task engagement, so that larger amplitudes result from active goal-directed responding to achieve a reward compared with the passive receipt of a reward [91].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Falkenstein M, Hohnsbein J, Hoorman J, Blanke L (1990) Effects of errors in choice reaction tasks on the ERP under focused and divided attention. In: Psychophysiological brain research (Brunia CHM, Gaillard AWK, Kok A, eds), pp. 192--195. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
  2. Yeung N (2004) Relating cognitive and affective theories of the error- related negativity. In: Errors, conflicts, and the brain. Current opinions on performance monitoring (Ullsperger M, Falkenstein M, eds), pp. 63--70. Leipzig: MPI of Cognitive Neuroscience.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yeung, N., Holroyd, C. B., & Cohen, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Yeung, Nick
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2004-08-18
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
535-544
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2096412262
Cited by
520
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 35
FWCI
5.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Carnegie Mellon University
  • National Institutes of Health (5f32mh063550-03)
  • Center for Neuroscience Research
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50 MH62196, P50MH062196, MH 63550)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
feedback negativity, reward processing, outcome valence, response selection, event-related potentials, motivation, task involvement, adverse outcomes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Choice Behavior, Decision Making, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Electroencephalography, Feedback, Female, Gambling, Humans, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Reinforcement, Psychology, Reward, Risk-Taking, Statistics as Topic, Event-Related Potentials, P300

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review