Cited by 220Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Changing reinforcing events: An approach to the treatment of depression.

Lewinsohn, Peter M., Sullivan, J. Michael, Grosscup, Sally J.·1980·Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0085929

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lewinsohn, P. M., Sullivan, J. M., & Grosscup, S. J.
Affiliations
University of Oregon (US)
Venue
Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice
Published
1980
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
322-334
ISSN
0033-3204 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025278588
Cited by
219
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
depression, reinforcement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review