Cited by 72Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionResilience and Mental HealthOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

Preserving Subjective Wellbeing in the Face of Psychopathology: Buffering Effects of Personal Strengths and Resources

Open access
Bos, Elisabeth H., Snippe, Evelien, de Jonge, Peter, Jeronimus, Bertus F.·2016·PLOS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many studies on resilience have shown that people can succeed in preserving mental health after a traumatic event. Less is known about whether and how people can preserve subjective wellbeing in the presence of psychopathology. We examined to what extent psychopathology can co-exist with acceptable levels of subjective wellbeing and which personal strengths and resources moderate the association between psychopathology and wellbeing. METHODS: Questionnaire data on wellbeing (Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life/Happiness Index), psychological symptoms (Depression Anxiety Stress Scales), and personal strengths and resources (humor, Humor Style questionnaire; empathy, Empathy Quotient questionnaire; social company; religion; daytime activities, Living situation questionnaire) were collected in a population-based internet study (HowNutsAreTheDutch; N = 12,503). Data of the subset of participants who completed the above questionnaires (n = 2411) were used for the present study. Regression analyses were performed to predict wellbeing from symptoms, resources, and their interactions. RESULTS: Satisfactory levels of wellbeing (happiness score 6 or higher) were found in a substantial proportion of the participants with psychological symptoms (58% and 30% of those with moderate and severe symptom levels, respectively). The association between symptoms and wellbeing was large and negative (-0.67, P < .001), but less so in persons with high levels of self-defeating humor and in those with a partner and/or pet. Several of the personal strengths and resources had a positive main effect on wellbeing, especially self-enhancing humor, having a partner, and daytime activities. CONCLUSIONS: Cultivating personal strengths and resources, like humor, social/animal company, and daily occupations, may help people preserve acceptable levels of wellbeing despite the presence of symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0150867

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [56]Kendler KS, Parnas J, editors. Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry III: The Nature and Sources of Historical Change United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2015.
  2. [58]IGDA Workgroup W. IGDA. Essentials of the World Psychiatric Association's International Guidelines for Diagnostic Assessment. Brit J Psychiat. 2003; 182: s37– s66.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bos, E. H., Snippe, E., de Jonge, P., & Jeronimus, B. F.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Bos, Elisabeth H.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2016-03-10
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
e0150867
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2295791456
Cited by
72
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
11.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
ZonMw (91812607)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
subjective well-being, happiness, psychopathology, depression, anxiety, stress, personal strengths, personal resources, humor, self-enhancing humor, self-defeating humor, empathy, social support, partners, PET, diurnal activity, resilience, moderating effect
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Personality, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review