Cited by 1,147Health disparities and outcomesRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchPublic Health and Social Inequalities

Understanding associations among race, socioeconomic status, and health: Patterns and prospects.

Open access
Williams, David R., Priest, Naomi, Anderson, Norman B.·2016·Health Psychology

Abstract

Race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status (SES) are social categories that capture differential exposure to conditions of life that have health consequences. Race/ethnicity and SES are linked to each other, but race matters for health even after SES is considered. This commentary considers the complex ways in which race combines with SES to affect health. There is a need for greater attention to understanding how risks and resources in the social environment are systematically patterned by race, ethnicity and SES, and how they combine to influence cardiovascular disease and other health outcomes. Future research needs to examine how the levels, timing and accumulation of institutional and interpersonal racism combine with other toxic exposures, over the life-course, to influence the onset and course of illness. There is also an urgent need for research that seeks to build the science base that will identify the multilevel interventions that are likely to enhance the health of all, even while they improve the health of disadvantaged groups more rapidly than the rest of the population so that inequities in health can be reduced and ultimately eliminated. We also need sustained research attention to identifying how to build the political support to reduce the large shortfalls in health. (PsycINFO Database Record

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/hea0000242

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The U.S. leads other middle- and high-income countries in both real and perceived healthcare disparities.

    “This is a major concern globally and especially in the U.S., which already leads other middle-and high-income countries in both real and perceived healthcare disparities69,70.”

    From Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities (2019) · cites this paper as [70]

    The opening section describes poorer quality of care for racial and ethnic minorities in the U.S. and globally. It does not say the U.S. leads middle- and high-income countries in healthcare disparities or compare perceived disparities across countries. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Braveman PA Cubbin C 2005 Socioeconomic Status in Health Research: One Size Does Not Fit All JAMA 294 22 2879 2888 16352796
  2. Cooper R Rotimi C 1997 The prevalence of hypertension in seven populations of west African origin Am J Public Health 87 2 160 168 9103091 PMC1380786
  3. Cooper RS Wolf-Maier K 2005 An international comparative study of blood pressure in populations of European vs. African descent BMC Med 3 1 2 15629061 PMC545060
  4. Jemal A Ward E 2008 Widening of Socioeconomic Inequalities in U.S. Death Rates, 1993–2001 PLoS ONE 3 5 e2181 18478119 PMC2367434
  5. Lewis TT Cogburn CD In Press Self-Reported Experiences of Discrimination and Health: Scientific Advances, Ongoing Controversies, and Emerging Issues Annual Review of Clinical Psychology PMC5555118 25581238
  6. Massey DS 2004 Segregation and stratification: a biosocial perspective Du Bois Review 1 1 7 25
  7. Mechanic D 2002 Disadvantage, inequality, and social policy Health Affairs 21 2 48 59 11900186
  8. Nobles M 2000 History Counts: A Comparative Analysis of Racial/Color Categorization in US and Brazilian Censuses American Journal of Public Health 90 11 1738 1745 11076243 PMC1446411
  9. Osypuk T Joshi P 2014 Do Social and Economic Policies Influence Health? A Review Current Epidemiology Reports 1 3 149 164 25984439 PMC4429302
  10. Pager D Shepherd H 2008 The Sociology of Discrimination: Racial Discrimination in Employment, Housing, Credit, and Consumer Markets Annual Review of Sociology 34 181 209 PMC2915460 20689680
  11. Priest N Paradies Y 2013 A systematic review of studies examining the relationship between reported racism and health and wellbeing for children and young people Social Science and Medicine 95 115 127 23312306
  12. Shonkoff JP Boyce W 2009 Neuroscience, molecular biology, and the childhood roots of health disparities: building a new framework for health promotion and disease prevention JAMA 301 2252 2259 19491187
  13. Thomas J Thomas DJ 1997 Cardiovascular Disease in African American and White Physicians: The Meharry Cohort and Meharry-Hopkins Cohort Studies Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved 8 3 270 284 9253218
  14. Williams DR 1999 The Monitoring of Racial/Ethnic Status in the USA: Data Quality Issues Ethnicity and Health 4 3 121 137 10832453
  15. Williams DR Collins C 2001 Racial Residential Segregation: A Fundamental Cause of Racial Disparities in Health Public Health Reports 116 5 404 416 12042604 PMC1497358
  16. Williams DR Mohammed SA 2013a Racism and Health I: Pathways and Scientific Evidence American Behavioral Scientist 57 8 1152 1173 PMC3863357 24347666
  17. Williams DR Mohammed SA 2010 Race, socioeconomic status, and health: Complexities, ongoing challenges, and research opportunities Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1186 1 69 101 20201869 PMC3442603

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, D. R., Priest, N., & Anderson, N. B.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • American Psychological Association (US)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2016-04
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
407-411
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W2325781243
Cited by
1,147
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 74 · 2025: 114 · 2024: 119 · 2023: 163 · 2022: 172 · 2021: 132 · 2020: 161 · 2019: 102 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI
92.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P50 CA 148596)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
Keywords
race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, health disparities, intersectionality, cardiovascular disease, institutional racism, interpersonal racism, toxic exposure, life course, multilevel interventions, social determinants of health
MeSH terms
Adult, Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans, Middle Aged, Social Class, Racial Groups, Health Status Disparities, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review