CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Decision-making framing in facial image comparison

Baker, Kristen A., Bindemann, Markus·2026·Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
DOI 10.1037/mac0000216

Published version of a preprint

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/mac0000216

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is evidence of individual differences in criterion placement at the participant level.

    “there is evidence of individual differences in criterion placement at the participant level (e.g., Baker et al., 2023;Baker & Bindemann, 2025)”

    From A criterion-placement theory of face matching (2026) · cites this paper as Baker & Bindemann, 2025

  • Criterion is influenced by task difficulty and the relative frequency with which matches and mismatches occur.

    “criterion is influenced by task difficulty and the relative frequency with which matches and mismatches occur (e.g., Baker & Bindemann, 2025;Stabile et al., 2024)”

    From A criterion-placement theory of face matching (2026) · cites this paper as Baker & Bindemann, 2025

  • Criterion shifts in face matching have been observed under a range of conditions, including airport context, costs/payoffs/unequal base rates, and superficial image differences.

    “Criterion shifts have been observed under a range of conditions, for example, when face matching is performed in an airport context (Bindemann et al., 2022), in response to costs, payoffs and unequal base rates (Baker & Bindemann, 2025;Stabile et al., 2024”

    From A criterion-placement theory of face matching (2026) · cites this paper as Baker & Bindemann, 2025

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 69

  1. Abudarham, N., & Yovel, G. (2016). Reverse engineering the face space: Discovering the critical features for face identification. Journal of Vision, 16(3), 40-40. https://doi.org/10.1167/16.3.40 · DOI
  2. Abudarham, N., Shkiller, L., & Yovel, G. (2019). Critical features for face recognition. Cognition, 182, 73-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.09.002 · DOI
  3. Alenezi, H. M., & Bindemann, M. (2013). The effect of feedback on face-matching accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(6), 735-753. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2968 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Alenezi, H. M., Bindemann, M., Fysh, M. C., & Johnston, R. A. (2015). Face matching in a long task: Enforced rest and desk-switching cannot maintain identification accuracy. PeerJ, 3, e1184. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1184 · DOI
  5. Aminoff, E. M., Clewett, D., Freeman, S., Frithsen, A., Tipper, C., Johnson, A., Grafton, S. T.,& Miller, M. B. (2012). Individual differences in shifting decision criterion: A recognition memory study. Memory & Cognition, 40(7), 1016-1030. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0204-6 · DOI
  6. Baker, K. A., Laurence, S., & Mondloch, C. J. (2017). How does a newly encountered face become familiar? The effect of within-person variability on adults' and children's perception of identity. Cognition, 161, 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.12.012 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Baker, K. A., & Mondloch, C. J. (2019). Two sides of face learning: Improving between- identity discrimination while tolerating more within-person variability in appearance. Perception, 48(11), 1124-1145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006619867862 · DOI
  8. Baker, K. A., & Mondloch, C. J. (2022). Picture this: Photographers no better than controls for recognizing unfamiliar faces. Perception, 51(8), 591-595. https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066221098727 · DOI
  9. Baker, K. A., & Mondloch, C. J. (2023). Unfamiliar face matching ability predicts the slope of face learning. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 5248. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023- 32244-w · DOI · Paper page
  10. Baker, K. A., Stabile, V. J., & Mondloch, C. J. (2023). Stable individual differences in unfamiliar face identification: Evidence from simultaneous and sequential matching tasks. Cognition, 232, 105333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105333 · DOI
  11. Baldassari, M. J., Kantner, J., & Lindsay, D. S. (2019). The importance of decision bias for predicting eyewitness lineup choices: toward a lineup skills test. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 4, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0150-3 · DOI
  12. Bang, J. W., & Rahnev, D. (2017). Stimulus expectation alters decision criterion but not sensory signal in perceptual decision making. Scientific reports, 7(1), 17072. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16885-2 · DOI
  13. Bindemann, M., Avetisyan, M., & Rakow, T. (2012a). Who can recognize unfamiliar faces? Individual differences and observer consistency in person identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(3), 277. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029635 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Bindemann, M., Brown, C., Koyas, T., & Russ, A. (2012b). Individual differences in face identification postdict eyewitness accuracy. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(2), 96-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.02.001 · DOI
  15. Bindemann, M., Fysh, M. C., Trifonova, I. V., Allen, J., McCall, C., & Burton, A. M. (2022). Face identification in the laboratory and in virtual worlds. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 11(1), 120. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/mac0000050 · DOI
  16. Bobak, A. K., Jones, A. L., Hilker, Z., Mestry, N., Bate, S., & Hancock, P. J. (2023). Data- driven studies in face identity processing rely on the quality of the tests and data sets. Cortex, 166, 348-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2023.05.018 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Bobak, A. K., Mileva, V. R., & Hancock, P. J. (2019). A grey area: how does image hue affect unfamiliar face matching?. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 4, 1- 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0174-3 · DOI
  18. Bohil, C. J., & Maddox, W. T. (2001). Category discriminability, base-rate, and payoff effects in perceptual categorization. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(2), 361-376. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194476 · DOI
  19. Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77(3), 305-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb02199.x · DOI
  20. Burton, A. M., White, D., & McNeill, A. (2010). The Glasgow Face Matching Test. Behavior Research Methods, 42(1), 286-291. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.1.286 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Burton, A. M. (2013). Why has research in face recognition progressed so slowly? The importance of variability. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(8), 1467- 1485. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.800125 · DOI
  22. Dale, G., & Arnell, K. M. (2015). Multiple measures of dispositional global/ local bias predict attentional blink magnitude. Psychological Research, 79, 534-547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0591-3 · DOI
  23. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149-1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Feng, X., & Burton, A. M. (2019). Identity documents bias face matching. Perception, 48(12), 1163-1174. https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066198778 · DOI
  26. Feng, X., & Burton, A. M. (2021). Understanding the document bias in face matching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(11), 2019-2029. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218211017902 · DOI
  27. Fysh, M. C., & Bindemann, M. (2018). The Kent Face Matching Test. British Journal of Psychology, 109(2), 219-231. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12260 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Fysh, M. C., & Bindemann, M. (2022). Molistic processing in facial image comparison. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 36(4), 830-841. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3975 · DOI
  29. Gentry, N. W., & Bindemann, M. (2019). Examples improve facial identity comparison. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(3), 376. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3975 · DOI
  30. Gong, J., Zhang, Y., Yang, Z., Huang, Y., Feng, J., & Zhang, W. (2013). The framing effect in medical decision-making: a review of the literature. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 18(6), 645-653. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2013.766352 · DOI
  31. Haarsma, J., Kaltenmaier, A., Fleming, S. M., & Kok, P. (2025). Expectations about presence enhance the influence of content-specific expectations on low-level orientation judgements. Cognition, 254, Article 105961. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105961 · DOI
  32. Homar, A. R., & Cvelbar, L. K. (2021). The effects of framing on environmental decisions: A systematic literature review. Ecological Economics, 183, 106950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106950 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Jenkins, R., White, D., Van Montfort, X., & Burton, A. M. (2011). Variability in photos of the same face. Cognition, 121(3), 313-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.001 · DOI
  34. Kantner, J., Vettel, J. M., & Miller, M. B. (2015). Dubious decision evidence and criterion flexibility in recognition memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1320. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01320 · DOI
  35. Keren, G. (Ed.). (2011). Perspectives on Framing (1st ed.). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203854167 · DOI
  36. Kühberger, A. (1998). The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta- analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75(1), 23-55. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2781 · DOI
  37. Laurence, S., & Mondloch, C. J. (2016). That's my teacher! Children's ability to recognize personally familiar and unfamiliar faces improves with age. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 143, 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.09.030 · DOI
  38. Lecheler, S., & De Vreese, C. H. (2011). Getting real: The duration of framing effects. Journal of Communication, 61(5), 959-983. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460- 2466.2011.01580.x · DOI
  39. Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 149-188. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2804 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Leynes, P. A. (2021). The effect of test query on recognition event-related potentials (ERPs). Brain and Cognition, 155, 105814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2021.105814 · DOI
  41. Lindow, S., & Betsch, T. (2018). Child decision-making: On the burden of predecisional information search. Journal of Cognition and Development, 19(2), 137-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2018.1436057 · DOI
  42. Lynn, S. K., & Barrett, L. F. (2014). "Utilizing" signal detection theory. Psychological Science, 25(9), 1663-1673. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614541991 · DOI
  43. Lynn, S. K., Wormwood, J. B., Barrett, L. F., & Quigley, K. S. (2015). Decision making from economic and signal detection perspectives: development of an integrated framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 952. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00952 · DOI
  44. Macmillan, N. A. & Kaplan, H. L. (1985) Detection theory analysis of group data: Estimating sensitivity from average hit and false-alarm rates. Psychological Bulletin, 98(1), 185. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.1.185. · DOI
  45. Maddox, W. T., & Bohil, C. J. (2005). Optimal classifier feedback improves cost-benefit but not base-rate decision criterion learning in perceptual categorization. Memory & Cognition, 33(2), 303-319. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195319 · DOI
  46. Matthews, C. M., Maurer, D., & Mondloch, C. J. (2022). Recognizing Facial Identity: Prolonged Development During Infancy and Childhood. In K.C. Kadosh (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198827474.013. · DOI
  47. McCaffery, J. M., & Burton, A. M. (2016). Passport checks: Interactions between matching faces and biographical details. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(6), 925-933. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3281 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Miller, M. B., & Kantner, J. (2020). Not all people are cut out for strategic criterion shifting. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(1), 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0112-9 · DOI
  49. Mill, R. D., & O'Connor, A. R. (2014). Question format shifts bias away from the emphasised response in tests of recognition memory. Consciousness and Cognition, 30, 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.09.006 · DOI
  50. O'Toole, A. J., Castillo, C. D., Parde, C. J., Hill, M. Q., & Chellappa, R. (2018). Face space representations in deep convolutional neural networks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(9), 794-809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.06.006 · DOI
  51. Papesh, M. H., Heisick, L. L., & Warner, K. A. (2018). The persistent low-prevalence effect in unfamiliar face-matching: The roles of feedback and criterion shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 24(3), 416. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000156 · DOI
  52. Ratcliff, R., Smith, P. L., Brown, S. D., & McKoon, G. (2016). Diffusion decision model: Current issues and history. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(4), 260-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.007 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Ritchie, K. L., & Burton, A. M. (2017). Learning faces from variability. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(5), 897-905. https:// doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1136656 · DOI
  54. Stabile, V. J., Baker, K. A., & Mondloch, C. J. (2024). Criterion shifting in an unfamiliar face-matching task: Effects of base rates, payoffs, and perceptual discriminability. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 13(4), 569-581. https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000157 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Stanislaw, H., & Todorov, N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(1), 137-149. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207704 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Stantic, M., Brewer, R., Duchaine, B., Banissy, M. J., Bate, S., Susilo, T., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2022). The Oxford Face Matching Test: A non biased test of the full range of individual differences in face perception. Behavior Research Methods, 54(1), 158-173. https://doi.org/10.3758/ s13428-021-01609-2 · DOI
  57. Stein, T., & Peelen, M. V. (2015). Content-specific expectations enhance stimulus detectability by increasing perceptual sensitivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(6), 1089-1104. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000109 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Summerfield, C., & Koechlin, E. (2008). A neural representation of prior information during perceptual inference. Neuron, 59(2), 336-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.05.021 · DOI
  59. Summerfield, C., & Tsetsos, K. (2012). Building bridges between perceptual and economic decision-making: Neural and computational mechanisms. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 70. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00070 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Summerfield, C., & Egner, T. (2014). Attention and decision-making. In A.C. Nobre & S. Kastner (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Attention (pp.837-864). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199675111.013.018 · DOI
  61. Towler, A., White, D., & Kemp, R. I. (2017). Evaluating the feature comparison strategy for forensic face identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 23(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000108 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Towler, A., Keshwa, M., Ton, B., Kemp, R. I., & White, D. (2021). Diagnostic feature training improves face matching accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(8), 1288. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000972 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Tummon, H. M., Allen, J., & Bindemann, M. (2019). Facial identification at a virtual reality airport. i-Perception, 10(4), 2041669519863077. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669519863077 · DOI
  64. Tyler, R., Towler, A., Kemp, R. I., & White, D. (2022). Let's talk about faces: Identifying faces from verbal descriptions. British Journal of Psychology, 114(1), 262-281. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12610 · DOI
  65. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453-458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43(2), 161-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749108400966 · DOI
  67. White, D., Burton, A. M., Kemp, R. I., & Jenkins, R. (2013). Crowd effects in unfamiliar face matching. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(6), 769 777. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2971 · DOI · Paper page
  68. White, D., Kemp, R. I., Jenkins, R., Matheson, M., & Burton, A. M. (2014). Passport officers' errors in face matching. PloS one, 9(8), e103510. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103510 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Wirth, B. E., & Carbon, C. C. (2017). An easy game for frauds? Effects of professional experience and time pressure on passport-matching performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 23(2), 138-157. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000114 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Baker, K. A., & Bindemann, M.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2026-06
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
213-224
ISSN
  • 2211-369X
  • 2211-3681
DOI
10.1037/mac0000216
Cited by
4
References
2
Language
en
Funders
The Royal Society (221754)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review