Cited by 165Psychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research Topics

Testing measurement invariance of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales (DASS-21) across four countries.

Scholten, Saskia, Velten, Julia, Bieda, Angela, Zhang, Xiao Chi, Margraf, Jürgen·2017·Psychological Assessment

Abstract

The rising burden of mental and behavioral disorders has become a global challenge (Murray et al., 2012). Measurement invariant clinical instruments are necessary for the assessment of relevant symptoms across countries. The present study tested the measurement invariance of the 21-item version of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales (DASS; Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995b) in Poland, Russia, the United Kingdom (U.K.), and the United States of America (U.S.). Telephone interviews were conducted with population-based samples (nPL = 1003, nRU = 3020, nU.K. = 1002, nU.S. = 1002). The DASS-21 shows threshold measurement invariance. Comparisons of latent means did not indicate differences between U.K. and U.S. Samples However, Polish and Russian samples reported more depressive symptoms compared with U.K. and U.S. samples; the Russian sample had the highest levels of anxiety symptoms and the Polish sample demonstrated the highest stress levels. The DASS-21 can be recommended to meaningfully compare the relationships between variables across groups and to compare latent means in Polish-, Russian-, and English-speaking populations. (PsycINFO Database Record

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/pas0000440

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scholten, S., Velten, J., Bieda, A., Zhang, X. C., & Margraf, J.
Affiliations
Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Published
2017-11
Volume
29
Issue
11
Pages
1376-1390
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W2581563282
Cited by
165
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
8.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
DASS-21, measurement invariance, depression, anxiety, stress, cross-cultural comparison, latent mean differences, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, cross-national comparison
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Depression, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Poland, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Russia, Stress, Psychological, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review