Cited by 43Sport Psychology and PerformanceMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsBehavioral Health and Interventions

Does a brief mindfulness intervention counteract the detrimental effects of ego depletion in basketball free throw under pressure?

Open access
Shaabani, Fatemeh, Naderi, Aynollah, Borella, Erika, Calmeiro, Luís·2020·Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology

Abstract

Research has shown that a brief mindfulness intervention may counteract the depleting effects of an emotion suppression task upon a subsequent psychological task that requires self-control. However, the effects of a brief mindfulness intervention on perceptual–motor tasks particularly in stressful situations have not yet been examined. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a brief mindfulness intervention can counteract the detrimental effects of ego-depletion in basketball free throw performance under pressure. Seventy-two basketball players (mean age = 28.6 ± 4.0 yrs) were randomly assigned to one of the following 4 groups: depletion/mindfulness, no depletion/mindfulness, depletion/no mindfulness and control (no depletion/no mindfulness). The mindfulness intervention consisted of a 15-min breathe and body mindfulness audio exercise, while the control condition (no mindfulness) listened to an audio book. A modified Stroop color-word task was used to manipulate self–control and induce ego depletion. Participants performed 30 free throws before and after the experimental manipulations. Results showed that basketball players’ free throw performance decreased after ego-depletion, but when ego-depletion was followed by the mindfulness intervention, free throw performance was maintained at a level similar to the control group. Our results indicate that a brief mindfulness intervention mitigates the effects of ego depletion in a basketball free-throw task.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/spy0000201

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Limited previous evidence suggests that practicing mindfulness can improve basketball athletes' free-throw performance.

    “The only limited previous evidence suggested that practicing mindfulness can improve basketball athletes’ free-throw performance [20,21].”

    From The Effect of Mindfulness Intervention on the Psychological Skills and Shooting Performances in Male Collegiate Basketball Athletes in Macau: A Quasi-Experimental Study (2023) · cites this paper as [20]

    Our indexed copy provides the title and bibliographic details but no findings. The title asks whether a mindfulness intervention counteracts ego depletion in basketball free throws under pressure; it does not say whether performance improved. Searches for improvement and results returned no decisive passage. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mindfulness training could significantly increase the free-throw percentage.

    “Results from the previous study corroborated evidence that mindfulness training could significantly increase the free-throw percentage [20,21].”

    From The Effect of Mindfulness Intervention on the Psychological Skills and Shooting Performances in Male Collegiate Basketball Athletes in Macau: A Quasi-Experimental Study (2023) · cites this paper as [20]

    The available copy contains the title and bibliographic information (unlabelled passage; Abstract metadata), but no results about free-throw percentage. Searches for free-throw percentage, significant improvement, and mindfulness-related performance found no outcome passage, so the claimed increase cannot be verified from this copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shaabani, F., Naderi, A., Borella, E., & Calmeiro, L.
Venue
Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology
Published
2020-05
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
197-215
ISSN
  • 2157-3905 (ISSN-L)
  • 2157-3913
OpenAlex
W2999035248
Cited by
43
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
9.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Sport Exercise and Performance Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Abertay Research Portal (Abertay University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • NIE Digital Repository (National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, ego depletion, basketball free throw, self-control, perceptual-motor performance, Stroop task, emotional suppression, sport stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review