Cited by 169Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesPsychological Testing and Assessment

Wisconsin Card Sorting Test

Grant, David A., Berg, Esta A.·2014·PsycTESTS Dataset

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/t31298-000

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People with frontal lobe damage and children under 4 years often keep using previously learned sorting rules and struggle to switch to new ones.

    “Individuals with frontal lobe damage and children younger than 4 years tend to persist in sorting cards according to previously learned rules and have difficulty flexibly switching to new sorting rules143.”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grant, D. A., & Berg, E. A.
Venue
PsycTESTS Dataset
Published
1948
OpenAlex
W4229495269
Cited by
169
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
Type
dataset
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
PsycTESTS Dataset (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, executive function, cognitive flexibility, abstract thinking, problem solving, neuropsychological assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review