Cited by 113Cognitive Abilities and TestingAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

A structural equation modeling investigation of age-related variance in executive function and DTI measured white matter damage

Charlton, R.A., Landau, S., Schiavone, F., Barrick, T.R., Clark, C.A., Markus, H.S., Morris, R.G.·2008·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

Cognitive changes in normal aging have been explained by the frontal-executive hypothesis, but the assumptions made by this hypothesis concerning the neurobiological causes are still a matter of debate. Executive functions (EF) may activate neural networks that include disparate grey matter regions, and rely on the integrity of white matter connections. In 118 adults (50-90 years old) from the GENIE study, white matter integrity was measured using diffusion tensor imaging, and information processing speed, fluid intelligence and EF were assessed. A theory-driven structural equation model was developed to test associations between variables. The model was revised, removing non-significant paths. The adjusted model explained well the covariance in our data; and suggested that the reduction in white matter integrity associated with age directly affected only working memory. Fluid intelligence was mediated by all measured cognitive variables. The results suggest that white matter integrity may be particularly important for abilities activating complex neural networks, as occurs in working memory. Integration of the information processing speed and frontal-executive hypotheses may provide important information regarding common, unique, and mediating factors in cognitive aging.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.03.017

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Age has a direct effect on information processing speed.

    “Structural equation models of cognitive ageing show that age has a direct effect on information processing speed (Charlton et al., 2007).”

    From Reducing working memory load in spoken dialogue systems (2009) · cites this paper as Charlton et al., 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Charlton, R. A., Landau, S., Schiavone, F., Barrick, T. R., Clark, C. A., Markus, H. S., & Morris, R. G.
Affiliations
  • St George's, University of London (GB)
  • University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Charlton, R.A.
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-10
Volume
29
Issue
10
Pages
1547-1555
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981747783
Cited by
113
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
FWCI
14.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
executive function, white matter integrity, normal cognitive aging, processing speed, fluid intelligence, working memory, diffusion tensor imaging, age-related cognitive decline
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Brain, Cognition, Computer Simulation, Female, Humans, Male, Memory Disorders, Memory, Short-Term, Mental Processes, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Nerve Fibers, Myelinated, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways, Neuropsychological Tests, Prospective Studies, Reaction Time, Wallerian Degeneration, Disease Progression, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review