Linking metacognition and mindreading: Evidence from autism and dual-task investigations.
Open accessAbstract
secondary task (regardless of whether it required mindreading) would diminish metacognitive accuracy. Finally, in both Experiments 1 and 2, metacognitive accuracy on the explicit task, but not the implicit task, was associated significantly with performance on a measure of mindreading ability. These results suggest that explicit metacognitive tasks (used frequently to measure metacognition in humans) share metarepresentational processing resources with mindreading, whereas implicit tasks (which are claimed by some comparative psychologists to measure metacognition in nonhuman animals) do not. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A secondary mentalizing task (but not another, equivalently demanding task) interferes with explicit metacognitive judgments.
“In addition, a secondary mentalizing task (but not another, equivalently demanding task) interfered with explicit metacognitive judgments (Nicholson et al. 2021).”
From Metacognition and Confidence: A Review and Synthesis (2024) · cites this paper as Nicholson et al. 2021
The Experiment 3 Summary reports that the secondary mindreading task impaired explicit judgment-of-confidence accuracy, whereas the non-mindreading control tasks did not. But the General Discussion says the authors could not control for all differences between the tasks and that judging emotion may have been more demanding than judging gender. The claim that the control task was equivalently demanding is therefore unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPerceptual metacognitive sensitivity on a task requiring explicit confidence judgments correlates with mentalizing abilities and is impaired in subjects with autism spectrum disorder.
“Recently, in an elegant series of studies, Nicholson and colleagues (2021) found that perceptual metacognitive sensitivity on a task requiring explicit confidence judgments (but not, intriguingly, one requiring an implicit gamble of the kind often used in animal metacognition experiments) correlated with mentalizing abilities and was impaired in subjects with autism spectrum disorder.”
From Metacognition and Confidence: A Review and Synthesis (2024) · cites this paper as Nicholson et al. 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,841 · see citing works
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193146 · Cited by 65,971 · cited 3× · see citing works
“A power calculation using G Power3 (Faul et al., 2007) revealed that, to detect a betweencondition (single/dual task) difference in judgment-of-confidence accuracy of d 0.88, on 80% of occasions (Cohen, 1992) using two-tailed tests, 22 participants per condition were required.”
MethodInfluentialCicchetti, D. V. (1994) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284 · Cited by 9,349 · see citing works
Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence
Dumont, R., Willis, J. O., Veizel, K., & Zibulsky, J. (2014) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118660584.ese2519 · Cited by 5,547 · cited 1× · see citing works
“All participants completed the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale for Intelligence-II (Wechsler, 1999), which provides verbal, performance, and full-scale IQ scores, as well as two widely used measures of mindreading (see details below).”
MethodBaron‐Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00715 · Cited by 4,555 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…with and without ASD (e.g., Wilson et al., 2014), is associated with the number of ASD traits shown by individuals in large population studies (e.g., Baron-Cohen et al., 2001), and is correlated with other measures of mindreading even after the influence of IQ is statistically controlled (e.g.,…”
BackgroundBayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis
Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.16.2.225 · Cited by 3,688 · see citing works
An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior
Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1416950 · Cited by 3,340 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The task, which is based on Heider and Simmel (1944), required participants to describe interactions between a large red triangle and a small blue triangle, as portrayed in a series of silent video clips.”
BackgroundEuchner, J. (2012) · doi:10.5437/08956308x5505002 · Cited by 2,840
THE PSYCHOLOGICAL CORPORATION.
Achilles, P. S. (1923) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.99.2565.161 · Cited by 2,285
Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results
Dienes, Z. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781 · Cited by 1,998 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This allows a more graded interpretation of the data than is possible using p values or effect sizes alone (e.g., Dienes, 2014; Rouder, Speckman, Sun, Morey, & Iverson, 2009) and is particularly useful for interpreting null findings because it provides an index of the extent to which data supports…”
MethodFleming, S. M., & Lau, H. C. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00443 · Cited by 1,386 · cited 1× · see citing works
““Type II” signal detection theory was used to characterize the metacognitive sensitivity of participants’ confidence reports to their correct or incorrect judgments using the meta-d= statistic (see Fleming & Lau, 2014; Maniscalco & Lau, 2012).”
MethodStatistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Wassertheil, S., & Cohen, J. (1970) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529115 · Cited by 1,383 · cited 6× · see citing works
“Where t tests were used, we report Cohen’s d values as an index of effect size ( 0.20 small effect, 0.50 moderate effect; 0.80 large effect; Cohen, 1969).”
MethodInfluentialConstantino, J. N. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1698-3_296 · Cited by 908 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The parents of all participants completed the Social Responsiveness Scale-II (Constantino & Gruber, 2012) to provide an index of number of ASD features/ traits manifested in participants (T scores of 50 represent the population average; T scores 59 indicate clinically significant levels of ASD…”
BackgroundManiscalco, B., & Lau, H. (2012) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.09.021 · Cited by 883 · see citing works
Small Telescopes: Detectability and the Evaluation of Replication Results
Simonsohn, U. (2015) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614567341 · Cited by 742 · see citing works
Abell, F., Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2000) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/s0885-2014(00)00014-9 · Cited by 720 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Each transcript was scored on a scale of zero to two for accuracy (including reference to specific mental states), based on the criteria outlined in Abell et al. (2000).”
MethodResultInfluentialHow we know our own minds: The relationship between mindreading and metacognition
Carruthers, P. (2009) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x09000545 · Cited by 610 · cited 9× · see citing works
“cesses rather than second-order, genuinely metacognitive processes (Carruthers, 2011). That is, it has been said that instead of monitoring their own states of certainty or uncertainty, as most comparative psychologists assume (a second-order, metacognitive, process), the animals can succeed in these tasks through fir…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialYirmiya, N., Erel, O., Shaked, M., & Solomonica‐Levi, D. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.283 · Cited by 470 · see citing works
Transfer of metacognitive skills and hint seeking in monkeys
Kornell, N., Son, L. K., & Terrace, H. S. (2007) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01850.x · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Golan, O., Baron-Cohen, S., & Hill, J. (2006) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-005-0057-y · Cited by 335 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In this new secondary task, after the presentation of each sentence from the Cambridge Mindreading Voice Battery (Golan et al., 2006), participants heard the words “male” and “female” and had to report verbally which sex the speaker of the sentence had been.”
MethodAllocation of self-paced study time and the "labor-in-vain effect."
Nelson, T. O., & Leonesio, R. J. (1988) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.14.4.676 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Understanding Minds and Metaphors: Insights from the Study of Figurative Language in Autism
Happé, F. G. E. (1995) · Metaphor and Symbolic Activity · doi:10.1207/s15327868ms1004_3 · Cited by 302 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…example, autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a developmental disorder diagnosed on the basis of significant impairments in social-communication and behavioral flexibility (American Psychiatric Association, 2013) and is characterized unambiguously by diminished mindreading ability (e.g., Happé, 1995).”
BackgroundJones, C. R. G., Simonoff, E., Baird, G., Pickles, A., Marsden, A. J. S., Tregay, J., Happé, F., & Charman, T. (2018) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.1873 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Williams, D. (2010) · Autism · doi:10.1177/1362361310366314 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Self-citationEncoding fluency is a cue used for judgments about learning.
Hertzog, C., Dunlosky, J., Robinson, A. E., & Kidder, D. P. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.29.1.22 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Test-retest reliability of the ‘Reading the Mind in the Eyes’ test: a one-year follow-up study
Fernández-Abascal, E. G., Cabello, R., Fernández-Berrocal, P., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2013) · Molecular Autism · doi:10.1186/2040-2392-4-33 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Do You have to Pay Attention to Your Feelings to be Influenced by Them?
Gasper, K., & Clore, G. (2000) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167200268005 · Cited by 180 · cited 1× · see citing works
“So a primary discrimination task that is executed fluently will result in a state of positive affect, which is known in humans to increase risk-taking (Gasper & Clore, 2000).”
BackgroundCasasanto, D., & Chrysikou, E. (2011) · Psychology Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611401755 · Cited by 158 · cited 1×
“For we know that easy tasks are ones that are performed fluently, and fluency is known to give rise to positive valence, whereas disfluent tasks cause negative valence (Casasanto & Chrysikou, 2011; Carr, Rotteveel, & Winkielman, 2016).”
BackgroundThe comparative study of metacognition: Sharper paradigms, safer inferences
Smith, J. D., Beran, M. J., Couchman, J. J., & Coutinho, M. V. C. (2008) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.15.4.679 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Animal metacognition: A tale of two comparative psychologies.
Smith, J. D., Couchman, J. J., & Beran, M. J. (2013) · Journal of comparative psychology · doi:10.1037/a0033105 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
The origins of belief representation: Monkeys fail to automatically represent others’ beliefs
Martin, A., & Santos, L. R. (2014) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.016 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Representing intentions in self and other: studies of autism and typical development.
Williams, D. M., & Happé, F. (2010) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00885.x · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Neuropsychology of Male Adults With High‐Functioning Autism or Asperger Syndrome
Wilson, C., Happe, F. G. E., Wheelwright, S. J., Ecker, C., Lombardo, M. V., Johnston, P., Daly, E., Murphy, C. M., Spain, D., Lai, M., et al. (2014) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.1394 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Beran, M. J., Smith, J. D., Coutinho, M. V. C., Couchman, J. J., & Boomer, J. B. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes · doi:10.1037/a0014626 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Williams, D. M., & Happe, F. G. E. (2009) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-009-0695-6 · Cited by 102 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…Baron-Cohen, & Simons, 2016; Grainger, Williams, & Lind, 2016a, 2016b; Nicholson et al., 2019; Williams, Bergström, & Grainger, 2018; Williams & Happé, 2010; Williams & Happé, 2009; Wilkinson, Best, Minshew, & Strauss, 2010; Wojcik, Allen, Brown, & Souchay, 2011; Wojcik et al.,…”
Self-citationThe emergence of metacognition: affect and uncertainty in animals
Carruthers, P., & Ritchie, J. B. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646739.003.0006 · Cited by 79 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…of monitoring their own states of certainty or uncertainty, as most comparative psychologists assume (a second-order, metacognitive, process), the animals can succeed in these tasks through first-order (cognitive rather than metacognitive) kinds of risk-evaluation (Carruthers & Ritchie, 2012).”
BackgroundSelf-citationMemory for actions in autism spectrum disorder
Wojcik, D. Z., Allen, R., Brown, C., & Souchay, C. (2011) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2011.590506 · Cited by 74 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…Williams, Bergström, & Grainger, 2018; Williams & Happé, 2010; Williams & Happé, 2009; Wilkinson, Best, Minshew, & Strauss, 2010; Wojcik, Allen, Brown, & Souchay, 2011; Wojcik et al., 2014), so basing an effect size on the weighted effect size across previous studies was inappropriate, in our view.”
ResultGrainger, C., Williams, D. M., & Lind, S. E. (2016) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2016.03.003 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citation(2020) · Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_301581 · Cited by 68 · cited 3×
“Others have claimed that metacognition and mindreading rely on entirely distinct systems (two-systems theory; e.g., Nichols & Stich, 2003).”
BackgroundInfluentialMeta-confidence judgments in rhesus macaques : explicit versus implicit mechanisms
Son, L., & Kornell, N. (2005) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195161564.003.0012 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Nicholson, T., Williams, D. M., Grainger, C., Lind, S. E., & Carruthers, P. (2019) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2019.01.013 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationMemory Awareness for Faces in Individuals with Autism
Wilkinson, D. A., Best-Popescu, C. A., Minshew, N. J., & Strauss, M. (2010) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-010-0995-x · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Reality Monitoring and Metamemory in Adults with Autism Spectrum Conditions
Cooper, R. A., Plaisted-Grant, K. C., Baron‐Cohen, S., & Simons, J. S. (2016) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-016-2749-x · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Williams, D. M., Bergström, Z. M., & Grainger, C. (2016) · Autism · doi:10.1177/1362361316680178 · Cited by 36 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…& Simons, 2016; Grainger, Williams, & Lind, 2016a, 2016b; Nicholson et al., 2019; Williams, Bergström, & Grainger, 2018; Williams & Happé, 2010; Williams & Happé, 2009; Wilkinson, Best, Minshew, & Strauss, 2010; Wojcik, Allen, Brown, & Souchay, 2011; Wojcik et al., 2014), so basing an effect…”
Self-citationMetacognitive judgments-of-learning in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder
Wojcik, D. Z., Waterman, A., Lestié, C., Moulin, C., & Souchay, C. (2014) · Autism · doi:10.1177/1362361313479453 · Cited by 28 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…Williams, Bergström, & Grainger, 2018; Williams & Happé, 2010; Williams & Happé, 2009; Wilkinson, Best, Minshew, & Strauss, 2010; Wojcik, Allen, Brown, & Souchay, 2011; Wojcik et al., 2014), so basing an effect size on the weighted effect size across previous studies was inappropriate, in our view.”
ResultEasy moves: Perceptual fluency facilitates approach-related action.
Carr, E. W., Rotteveel, M., & Winkielman, P. (2016) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000146 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
What Autism May Tell Us About Self‐Awareness: A Commentary on Frith and Happé
Raffman, D. (1999) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/1468-0017.00101 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Grainger, C., Williams, D. M., & Lind, S. E. (2016) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-016-2895-1 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationMetacognition may be more impaired than mindreading in autism
Williams, D. M., Lind, S., & Happé, F. (2009) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x09000818 · Cited by 15 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…(e.g., Fernández-Abascal, Cabello, Fernández-Berrocal, & Baron-Cohen, 2013), clearly distinguishes groups of participants with and without ASD (e.g., Wilson et al., 2014), is associated with the number of ASD traits shown by individuals in large population studies (e.g., Baron-Cohen et al., 2001),…”
BackgroundSelf-citation(2020) · Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_301419 · Cited by 2 · cited 1×
“The task, which is based on Heider and Simmel (1944), required participants to describe interactions between a large red triangle and a small blue triangle, as portrayed in a series of silent video clips.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
9 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Baron-Cohen S., Wheelwright S., Spong A., Scahill V., & Lawson J. (2001). Are intuitive physics and intuitive psychology independent? A test with children with Asperger Syndrome. Journal of Developmental and Learning Disorders, 5, 47– 78. 10.1017/S0021963001006643 · DOI · Paper page
- Carruthers P. (2011). The opacity of mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Cohen J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155– 159. 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 19565683 · DOI · Paper page
- Goldman A. (2006). Simulating minds. New York, NY: Oxford University Press 10.1093/0195138929.001.0001 · DOI
- Jeffreys H. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Nichols S., & Stich S. (2003). Mindreading. New York, NY: Oxford University Press 10.1093/0198236107.001.0001 · DOI
- World Health Organization (1992). International classification of mental and behavioral disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines (10th ed.). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Metacognition and Confidence: A Review and Synthesis
Fleming, S. M. (2024) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-022423-032425 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
“In addition, a secondary mentalizing task (but not another, equivalently demanding task) interfered with explicit metacognitive judgments (Nicholson et al., 2021).”
Perceptual reality monitoring: Neural mechanisms dissociating imagination from reality.Preprint
Dijkstra, N., Kok, P., & Fleming, S. (2021) · Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.31234/osf.io/zngeq · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Carruthers, P., & Williams, D. M. (2022) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105117 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
“15 But van den Berg, Anandalingam, et al. (2016) used a procedure with adult humans very much like the gambling task employed with monkeys by Kornell et al. (2007) and with humans by Nicholson et al. (2021), except that confidence was measured at the same time as the primary discrimination judgment.”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationMeasuring metacognitive performance: type 1 performance dependence and test-retest reliability
Guggenmos, M. (2021) · Neuroscience of Consciousness · doi:10.1093/nc/niab040 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
“A frequent use case is between-subject designs in which performance levels might differ between participants and/or groups and which thus explicitly require a measures invariant to type 1 performance (Baird et al. 2014; Hauser et al. 2017; Sadeghi et al. 2017; Faivre et al. 2020; Hertz et al. 2020; Nicholson et al. 20…”
BackgroundCuriosity as a metacognitive feeling.
Goupil, L., & Proust, J. (2022) · Cognition · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4141925 · Cited by 63
The future of metacognition research: Balancing construct breadth with measurement rigor
Katyal, S., & Fleming, S. M. (2024) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2023.11.002 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
“…scenario, a mentalising task (but not a similarly demanding non-mentalising task) impairs the fidelity of (self-directed) confidence ratings on a metacognition task, indicating a sharing of cognitive resources between self-directed metacognition and mentalising about others (Nicholson et al., 2021).”
BackgroundA meta-analysis and critical review of metacognitive accuracy in autism
Carpenter, K. L., & Williams, D. M. (2022) · Autism · doi:10.1177/13623613221106004 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“To our knowledge, only three studies have employed these non-verbal measures in studies of metacognition in autism (Carpenter et al., 2019; Nicholson et al., 2019, 2021).”
BackgroundSelf-citationDecision-making in autism: A narrative review
van der Plas, E., Mason, D., & Happe, F. G. E. (2023) · Autism · doi:10.1177/13623613221148010 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Georgiou, N., Delfabbro, P., & Balzan, R. P. (2021) · Cognitive Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.1080/13546805.2021.1924650 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
A Quick Measure of Theory of Mind in Autistic Adults: Decision Accuracy, Latency and Self-Awareness
Brewer, N., Young, R. L., Norris, J. E., Maras, K., Michael, Z., & Barnett, E. (2021) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-021-05166-7 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Fleming, S. M. (2023) · Journal of Consciousness Studies · doi:10.53765/20512201.30.9.113 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“A ade m f r ep Nevertheless, the importance of metacognition and ‘introspective p i n -- no y gh ( ) I u e l the fully trained architecture to adaptively bail out of navigation decisions that it predicted may end in failure (Daftry et al. , 2016).”
Is self‐awareness necessary to have a theory of mind?
Calmette, T., & Meunier, H. (2024) · Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1111/brv.13090 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Assessing both implicit and explicit metacognition through judgement-of-con fi dence tasks of perceptual discrimination, and theory of mind through the animation task and the reading the mind in the eyes test, Nicholson et al .”
InfluentialDifferentiating mental models of self and others: A hierarchical framework for knowledge assessment.
Kumar, A., Smyth, P., & Steyvers, M. (2023) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000443 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Empirical studies have provided increasing support for commonalities between metacognition and theory of mind based on shared cognitive resources (Nicholson et al., 2021), overlapping brain structures (Vaccaro & Fleming, 2018), and overlapping developmental trajectories (Gopnik & Astington, 1988;…”
BackgroundConversation and the evolution of metacognition
Planer, R. J. (2023) · Evolutionary Linguistic Theory · doi:10.1075/elt.00047.pla · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Embon, I., Cukier, S., Iorio, A., Barttfeld, P., & Solovey, G. (2023) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2023.103502 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Metacognition facilitates theory of mind through optimal weighting of trait inferences
Long, E. L., Catmur, C., Fleming, S. M., & Bird, G. (2024) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106042 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Metacognition and Cognitive Flexibility in Autistic and Neurotypically‐Developing Populations
Ordin, M., Barbarroja, N., Polyanskaya, L., Manrique, H. M., & Castelo-Branco, M. S. (2025) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.70668 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Reduced Susceptibility to the Dunning–Kruger Effect in Autistic Employees
Hartman, L. M., Glassman, H., & Hartman, B. L. (2025) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.70139 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“However, studies using bias-free measures of metacognition have also produced mixed results, with some showing differences between autistic and non-autistic participants (Nicholson et al. 2020; van der Plas et al. 2021) and some showing no differences (Embon et al. 2023).”
Social perspective-taking influences on metacognition
Battich, L., Pacherie, É., & Grèzes, J. (2024) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105966 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Toddlers' visual exploration during decisions predicts uncertainty monitoring 1 year later
Leckey, S., Gonzales, C. R., Selmeczy, D., & Ghetti, S. (2024) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.14174 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“…monitoring and ToM, such as a recent study which revealed impaired uncertainty monitoring and ToM abilities in children with autism spectrum disorder compared to typically developing children and, across both groups, uncertainty monitoring was associated with ToM (Nicholson et al., 2021).”
Li, Z., Dai, W., & Jia, N. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1037085 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Perceptual meta-uncertainty reveals enhanced calibration of sensory confidence in autism
Fazioli, L., Hadad, B.-S., Denison, R. N., & Yashar, A. (2026) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aee2332 · Cited by 1
The motoric theory of curiosity
Carruthers, P. (2026) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/mila.70017
Self-citationJorba, M., Raventós, A., Batlle, A., Sánchez, A., & Vicente, A. (2025) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.106039
Ventura, M., Manippa, V., Caffò, A. O., Cicinelli, G., Nobile, E., Keller, R., & Rivolta, D. (2025) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-025-06879-9 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“…studies in ASD led to mixed results; some research reports no differences between non-autistic and autistic participants’ metacogni - tion levels (Nicholson et al., 2021; Williams et al., 2018), while others suggest that they show several difficulties in metacognitive abilities (Maras et al.,…”
Persistence suggests metacognition in capuchin monkeys
Calmette, T., Calmette, T., & Meunier, H. (2024) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2024.10.022 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Embon, I., Gerbaudo, M. A., Usaj, A., Iorio, A., Barttfeld, P., & Solovey, G. (2024) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-024-06669-z · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“…2018 ; Seow et al., 2021 ; Seow & Gillan, 2020 ; Benwell et al., 2022; Fox et al., 2023 ), schizophrenia (Hoven et al., 2019 ; Seow et al., 2021 ), nicotine dependence (Soutschek et al., 2022), autism spectrum disorder (Embon et al., 2023; Nicholson et al., 2020 ), and stress (Smith et al., 2024 ).”
Soto, D., Salazar, A., Elosegi, P., Walter, A., Mei, N., Rodríguez-Armendariz, E., Petrolini, V., & Vicente, A. (2024) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-023-02443-7 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Christian, P., Löfström, R., & Guterstam, A. (2026) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.115602
“…between previous studies on metacognition, ToM, and autism, where some studies have found that autistic individuals experience difficulties in metacognition alongside their ToM deficits, 29,30,36 while others observed no association between impairments in ToM and metacognitive abilities.”
Zhang, A., Peng, F., Lai, W., Qu, C., & Zou, L. (2026) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-026-07285-5
Santos, K. T., Gomes, A. C. P., Alves, T. A., Lima, Q. S., Lemos, N. G., & Lemos, F. A. (2026) · Cadernos Brasileiros de Terapia Ocupacional · doi:10.1590/2526-8910.cto411740411
Santos, K. T., Gomes, A. C. P., Alves, T. A., Lima, Q. S., Lemos, N. G., & Lemos, F. A. (2026) · Cadernos Brasileiros de Terapia Ocupacional · doi:10.1590/2526-8910.cto411740412
- Authors
- Nicholson, T., Williams, D. M., Lind, S. E., Grainger, C., & Carruthers, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Stirling (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Williams, David M.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Published
- 2021-02
- Volume
- 150
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 206-220
- ISSN
- 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2222
- PMC
- PMC7832215
- OpenAlex
- W3025728845
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5
- FWCI
- 8.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- City Research Online (City University London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/M009890/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Keywords
- metacognition, theory of mind, autism spectrum disorder, dual-task performance, metacognitive accuracy, comparative cognition
- MeSH terms
- Metacognition, Adolescent, Autistic Disorder, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review