Cited by 435Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum optics and atomic interactions

Controlled exchange interaction between pairs of neutral atoms in an optical lattice

Open access
Anderlini, Marco, Lee, Patricia J., Brown, Benjamin L., Sebby-Strabley, Jennifer, Phillips, William D., Porto, J. V.·2007·Nature

Abstract

Ultracold atoms trapped by light offer robust quantum coherence and controllability, providing an attractive system for quantum information processing and for the simulation of complex problems in condensed matter physics. Many quantum information processing schemes require the manipulation and deterministic entanglement of individual qubits; this would typically be accomplished using controlled, state-dependent, coherent interactions among qubits. Recent experiments have made progress towards this goal by demonstrating entanglement among an ensemble of atoms confined in an optical lattice. Until now, however, there has been no demonstration of a key operation: controlled entanglement between atoms in isolated pairs. Here we use an optical lattice of double-well potentials to isolate and manipulate arrays of paired (87)Rb atoms, inducing controlled entangling interactions within each pair. Our experiment realizes proposals to use controlled exchange coupling in a system of neutral atoms. Although 87Rb atoms have nearly state-independent interactions, when we force two atoms into the same physical location, the wavefunction exchange symmetry of these identical bosons leads to state-dependent dynamics. We observe repeated interchange of spin between atoms occupying different vibrational levels, with a coherence time of more than ten milliseconds. This observation demonstrates the essential component of a neutral atom quantum SWAP gate (which interchanges the state of two qubits). Its 'half-implementation', the root SWAP gate, is entangling, and together with single-qubit rotations it forms a set of universal gates for quantum computation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature06011

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent experiments use exchange interactions in double-well potentials to create arrays of robust Bell pairs, which could be used as an alternative way to create cluster states in the lattice.

    “Recent experiments use exchange interactions in double-well potentials to create arrays of robust Bell pairs, which could be used as an alternative way to create cluster states in the lattice 29,30”

    From Measurement-based quantum computation (2009) · cites this paper as [29]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderlini, M., Lee, P. J., Brown, B. L., Sebby-Strabley, J., Phillips, W. D., & Porto, J. V.
Affiliations
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Porto, J. V.
Venue
Nature
Published
2007-07
Volume
448
Issue
7152
Pages
452-456
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2028190807
Cited by
435
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 13
FWCI
23.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
Keywords
neutral atom quantum computing, optical lattices, double-well potential, rubidium-87, SWAP gate, quantum coherence, ultracold atoms, quantum gates, qubit entanglement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review