Cited by 1,830stochastic dynamics and bifurcationAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical MechanicsChaos control and synchronization

Stochastic resonance and the benefits of noise: from ice ages to crayfish and SQUIDs

Wiesenfeld, Kurt, Moss, Frank·1995·Nature

Abstract

Noise in dynamical systems is usually considered a nuisance. But in certain nonlinear systems, including electronic circuits and biological sensory apparatus, the presence of noise can in fact enhance the detection of weak signals. This phenomenon, called stochastic resonance, may find useful application in physical, technological and biomedical contexts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/373033a0

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Including stochastic effects as well as circadian modulation of CRH drive produced noise-induced coherent oscillations (NICOs) for values of CRH drive close to but below the transition curve.

    “Perhaps most significantly, when we included stochastic effects as well as a circadian modulation of the CRH drive, we observed so-called noise-induced coherent oscillations (NICOs) (Wiesenfeld & Moss 1995; Gammaitoni et al. 1998) for values of the CRH drive close to (but below) the transition curve (beyond which ultradian pulses were observed in the noise-free scenario).”

    From Origin of ultradian pulsatility in the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis (2010) · cites this paper as Wiesenfeld & Moss 1995

  • Stochastic resonance can increase the sensitivity of sensory detectors, including neurons, enhancing the detection of weak signals.

    “Stochastic resonance can increase the sensitivity of sensory detectors, including neurons, enhancing the detection of weak signals65,66.”

    From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [66]

  • Stochastic resonance can amplify the signal/noise ratio under appropriate circumstances, such as a non-linear system with a fixed threshold.

    “However, the phenomenon of stochastic resonance can amplify the signal/noise ratio under appropriate circumstances (i.e. a non-linear system with a fixed threshold, Wiesenfeld & Moss, 1995).”

    From Vision in autism spectrum disorders (2009) · cites this paper as Wiesenfeld & Moss, 1995

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiesenfeld, K., & Moss, F.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Missouri–St. Louis (US)
Venue
Nature
Published
1995-01
Volume
373
Issue
6509
Pages
33-36
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2029010014
Cited by
1,830
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 55
FWCI
60.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › stochastic dynamics and bifurcation
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Chaos control and synchronization
Keywords
stochastic resonance, noise-enhanced signal detection, weak signal detection, nonlinear dynamical systems, electronic circuits, ice ages, crayfish, squid
MeSH terms
Animals, Astacoidea, Electrophysiology, Humans, Models, Neurological, Sensation, Visual Perception, Signal Transduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review