Cited by 226Neural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Researchstochastic dynamics and bifurcation

Gain control of firing rate by shunting inhibition: Roles of synaptic noise and dendritic saturation

Open access
Prescott, Steven A., De Koninck, Yves·2003·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Adjusting input–output gain is crucial for information processing by the brain. Gain control of subthreshold depolarization is commonly ascribed to increased membrane conductance caused by shunting inhibition. But contrary to its divisive effect on depolarization, shunting inhibition on its own fails to divisively modulate firing rate, apparently upsetting a critical tenet of neural models that use shunting inhibition to achieve gain control. Using a biophysically realistic neuron model, we show that divisive modulation of firing rate by shunting inhibition requires synaptic noise to smooth the relation between firing rate and somatic depolarization; although necessary, noise alone endows shunting inhibition with only a modest divisive effect on firing rate. In addition to introducing noise, synaptic input is associated with a nonlinear relation between somatic depolarization and excitation because of dendritic saturation; this nonlinearity dramatically enhances divisive modulation of firing rate by shunting inhibition under noisy conditions. Thus, shunting inhibition can act as a mechanism for firing rate gain control, but its modulatory effects (which include both divisive and subtractive components) are fully explained only when both synaptic noise and dendritic saturation are taken into account.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0337591100

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Changes in the level of synaptically driven fluctuations in membrane potential may regulate the gain of the I/O curve for individual neurons.

    “Changes in the level of synaptically driven fluctuations in Vm (also called synaptic fluctuations or synaptic noise) may regulate the gain of the I/O curve for individual neurons57–60 (but see REF.61).”

    From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [59]

  • This dynamic range can be adjusted through gain control mediated by the overall level of synaptic inhibition.

    “In turn, this dynamic range can be adjusted through gain control that is mediated by the overall level of synaptic inhibition4,59,68,69.”

    From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [59]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prescott, S. A., & De Koninck, Y.
Affiliations
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • Neurobiologie Cellulaire, Centre de Recherche Université Laval Robert-Giffard, Beauport, QC, Canada G1J 2G3; and Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada H3G 1Y6
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2003-02-04
Volume
100
Issue
4
Pages
2076-2081
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1975302642
Cited by
226
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
FWCI
7.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › stochastic dynamics and bifurcation
Keywords
shunting inhibition, gain control, firing rate, synaptic noise, neuron models
MeSH terms
Animals, Dendrites, Synapses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review