The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes
Open accessAbstract
Most cellular processes are carried out by multiprotein complexes. The identification and analysis of their components provides insight into how the ensemble of expressed proteins (proteome) is organized into functional units. We used tandem-affinity purification (TAP) and mass spectrometry in a large-scale approach to characterize multiprotein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We processed 1,739 genes, including 1,143 human orthologues of relevance to human biology, and purified 589 protein assemblies. Bioinformatic analysis of these assemblies defined 232 distinct multiprotein complexes and proposed new cellular roles for 344 proteins, including 231 proteins with no previous functional annotation. Comparison of yeast and human complexes showed that conservation across species extends from single proteins to their molecular environment. Our analysis provides an outline of the eukaryotic proteome as a network of protein complexes at a level of organization beyond binary interactions. This higher-order map contains fundamental biological information and offers the context for a more reasoned and informed approach to drug discovery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T. A., Judson, R. S., Knight, J. R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001009 · Cited by 4,706
Global Analysis of Protein Activities Using Proteome Chips
Zhu, H., Bilgin, M., Bangham, R., Hall, D., Casamayor, A., Bertone, P., Lan, N., Jansen, R., Bidlingmaier, S., Houfek, T., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1062191 · Cited by 1,884
Comparative Genomics of the Eukaryotes
Rubin, G. M., Yandell, M. D., Wortman, J. R., Gabor, G. L., Miklos, Nelson, C. R., Hariharan, I. K., Fortini, M. E., Li, P. W., Apweiler, R., et al. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5461.2204 · Cited by 1,698
Cited by
Items 101–118 of 118
Transcriptional regulation of protein complexes within and across species
Tan, K., Shlomi, T., Feizi, H., Ideker, T., & Sharan, R. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0606914104 · Cited by 58
Cierpicki, T., & Grembecka, J. (2015) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/imr.12244 · Cited by 53
Systems biology in neuroscience: bridging genes to cognition
Grant, S. G. (2003) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2003.09.016 · Cited by 53
The evolving contribution of mass spectrometry to integrative structural biology
Faini, M., Stengel, F., & Aebersold, R. (2016) · Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1007/s13361-016-1382-4 · Cited by 44
Ghadie, M. A., Lambourne, L., Vidal, M., & Xia, Y. (2017) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005717 · Cited by 39
Gingras, A.-C., & Raught, B. (2012) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2012.03.065 · Cited by 34
Fu, C.-Y., Uetrecht, C., Kang, S., Morais, M. C., Heck, A. J. R., Walter, M. R., & Prevelige, P. E. (2010) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m900625-mcp200 · Cited by 33
Janin, J., & Wodak, S. J. (2002) · Advances in Protein Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0065-3233(02)61000-9 · Cited by 31
Peck Justice, S. A., Barron, M. P., Qi, G. D., Wijeratne, H. R. S., Victorino, J. F., Simpson, E. R., Vilseck, J. Z., Wijeratne, A. B., & Mosley, A. L. (2020) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.ra120.014576 · Cited by 28
Peck Justice, S. A., Qi, G., Wijeratne, H. R. S., Victorino, J. F., Simpson, E. R., Wijeratne, A. B., & Mosley, A. L. (2019) · doi:10.1101/2019.12.30.891267 · Cited by 28
hu.MAP3.0: atlas of human protein complexes by integration of >25,000 proteomic experiments
Fischer, S. N., Claussen, E. R., Kourtis, S., Sdelci, S., Orchard, S., Hermjakob, H., Kustatscher, G., & Drew, K. (2025) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/s44320-025-00121-5 · Cited by 25
Network-Free Inference of Knockout Effects in Yeast
Peleg, T., Yosef, N., Ruppin, E., & Sharan, R. (2010) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000635 · Cited by 14
Proteomic studies of micronutrient deficiency and toxicity
Ali, A., Bhat, B. A., Rather, G. A., Malla, B. A., & Ganie, S. A. (2020) · Plant Micronutrients · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49856-6_11 · Cited by 15
Kawaguchi, S., Xu, X., Soga, T., Yamaguchi, K., Kawasaki, R., Shimouchi, R., Date, S., & Kai, T. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.101967.3 · Cited by 10
Multi-epitope immunocapture of huntingtin reveals striatum-selective molecular signatures
(2025) · doi:10.1038/s44320-025-00096-3 · Cited by 7
An interaction between β′-COP and the ArfGAP, Glo3, maintains post-Golgi cargo recycling
Xie, B., Guillem, C., Date, S. S., Cohen, C. I., Jung, C., Kendall, A. K., Best, J. T., Graham, T. R., & Jackson, L. P. (2023) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.202008061 · Cited by 6
One-by-one sample preparation method for protein network analysis
Iemura, S.-I., & Natsume, T. (2012) · Protein Interactions · doi:10.5772/37931 · Cited by 2
(2025) · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0299440 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Gavin, A.-C., Bösche, M., Krause, R., Grandi, P., Marzioch, M., Bauer, A., Schultz, J., Rick, J. M., Michon, A.-M., Cruciat, C.-M., Remor, M., Höfert, C., Schelder, M., Brajenovic, M., Ruffner, H., Merino, A., Klein, K., Hudak, M., Dickson, D., Rudi, T., Gnau, V., Bauch, A., Bastuck, S., Huhse, B., Leutwein, C., Heurtier, M.-A., Copley, R. R., Edelmann, A., Querfurth, E., Rybin, V., Drewes, G., Raida, M., Bouwmeester, T., Bork, P., Seraphin, B., Kuster, B., Neubauer, G., & Superti-Furga, G.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 415
- Issue
- 6868
- Pages
- 141-147
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2084619201
- Cited by
- 4,759
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 157.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
