Cited by 593Diabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Management and ResearchPancreatic function and diabetes

The NOD mouse model of type 1 diabetes: As good as it gets?

Atkinson, Mark A., Leiter, Edward H.·1999·Nature Medicine

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/9442

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Atkinson, M. A., & Leiter, E. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • Jackson Laboratory (US)
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
1999-06
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
601-604
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W1590974138
Cited by
588
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 29
FWCI
15.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Mouseion at the JAXlibrary (Jackson Laboratory) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
Keywords
NOD mice, type 1 diabetes, BioBreeding rat, autoimmune diabetes, model limitations
MeSH terms
Animals, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Major Histocompatibility Complex, Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, T-Lymphocytes, Mice, Inbred NOD, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review