Cited by 62Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudySmoking Behavior and CessationMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Varenicline ameliorates nicotine withdrawal-induced learning deficits in C57BL/6 mice.

Open access
Raybuck, Jonathan D., Portugal, George S., Lerman, Caryn, Gould, Thomas J.·2008·Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Varenicline, a partial agonist for a4ss2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) and full agonist for a7 nAChRs, has been approved for the treatment of smoking cessation. Although recent clinical trials support the efficacy of varenicline for managing global nicotine withdrawal symptoms and for smoking cessation, its effects on animal models of specific withdrawal-associated behaviors have not been tested. The present study evaluated the effects of varenicline on contextual fear conditioning and its effects on nicotine (6.3 mg/kg/day) withdrawal-induced deficits in contextual fear conditioning. Varenicline (0.01, 0.1, 1.0 mg/kg) had no effect on contextual fear conditioning when administered alone, but (0.1 mg/kg) prevented nicotine withdrawal-associated deficits in contextual fear conditioning. These data demonstrate, for the first time, that varenicline reverses nicotine withdrawal-induced deficits in an animal model and suggest that varenicline may be effective at treating nicotine withdrawal-associated deficits in learning and memory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0012601

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raybuck, J. D., Portugal, G. S., Lerman, C., & Gould, T. J.
Affiliations
  • Temple University (US)
  • Abramson Cancer Center (US)
Venue
Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2008
Volume
122
Issue
5
Pages
1166-1171
ISSN
  • 0735-7044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0084
OpenAlex
W1980507550
Cited by
62
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA017949 TG)
  • National Cancer Institute/National Institute on Drug Abuse (P5084718 PI)
  • National Institutes of Health (T32DA07237)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
varenicline, nicotine withdrawal, contextual fear conditioning, learning deficits, memory impairment, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, smoking cessation, C57BL/6 mice
MeSH terms
Varenicline, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Benzazepines, Conditioning, Psychological, Disease Models, Animal, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Fear, Learning Disabilities, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Quinoxalines, Tobacco Use Disorder, Nicotinic Agonists, Freezing Reaction, Cataleptic, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review