Cited by 87Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchSmoking Behavior and Cessation

Up-regulation of Nicotinic Receptors by Nicotine Varies with Receptor Subtype

Open access
Walsh, Heather, Govind, Anitha P., Mastro, Ryan, Hoda, J.C., Bertrand, Daniel, Vallejo, Yolanda, Green, William N.·2008·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that in addition to alpha4beta2 and alpha3-containing nicotinic receptors, alpha6-containing receptors are present in midbrain dopaminergic neurons and involved in the nicotine reward pathway. Using heterologous expression, we found that alpha6beta2, like alpha3beta2 and alpha4beta2 receptors, formed high affinity epibatidine binding complexes that are pentameric, trafficked to the cell surface, and produced acetylcholine-evoked currents. Chronic nicotine exposure up-regulated alpha6beta2 receptors with differences in up-regulation time course and concentration dependence compared with alpha4beta2 receptors, the predominant high affinity nicotine binding site in brain. The alpha6beta2 receptor up-regulation required higher nicotine concentrations than for alpha4beta2 but lower than for alpha3beta2 receptors. The alpha6beta2 up-regulation occurred 10-fold faster than for alpha4beta2 and slightly faster than for alpha3beta2. Our data suggest that nicotinic receptor up-regulation is subtype-specific such that alpha6-containing receptors up-regulate in response to transient, high nicotine exposures, whereas sustained, low nicotine exposures up-regulate alpha4beta2 receptors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m703432200

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence indicates that α4β2* nAChRs do not down-regulate in response to lasting cholinergic stimulation.

    “Evidence indicating that α4β2* nAChRs do not down-regulate in response to lasting cholinergic stimulation (Walsh et al, 2008, Yates et al, 1995) is consistent with this assumption.”

    From Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition (2011) · cites this paper as Walsh et al, 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walsh, H., Govind, A. P., Mastro, R., Hoda, J. C., Bertrand, D., Vallejo, Y., & Green, W. N.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Green, William N.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-03
Volume
283
Issue
10
Pages
6022-6032
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997230575
Cited by
87
References
66
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, nicotine, receptor up-regulation, alpha4beta2 receptor, receptor subtype specificity, epibatidine binding, acetylcholine-evoked currents, chronic nicotine exposure, midbrain dopaminergic neurons
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Line, Ganglionic Stimulants, Mesencephalon, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, Nicotine, Receptors, Nicotinic, Time Factors, Up-Regulation, Protein Transport, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review