Cited by 12Body Composition Measurement TechniquesNutrition and Health in AgingIndigenous Health and Education

Development of a single-frequency bioimpedance prediction equation for fat-free mass in an adult Indigenous Australian population

Hughes, J T, Maple-Brown, L J, Piers, L S, Meerkin, J, O'Dea, K, Ward, L C·2015·European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background/objectives To describe the development of a single-frequency bioimpedance prediction equation for fat-free mass (FFM) suitable for adult Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples with and without diabetes or indicators of chronic kidney disease (CKD).Subjects/methods FFM was measured by whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in 147 adult Indigenous Australians. Height, weight, body circumference and resistance were also measured. Adults with and without diabetes and indicators of CKD were examined. A random split sample with internal cross-validation approach was used to predict and subsequently validate FFM using resistance, height, weight, age and gender against measured FFM.Results Among 147 adults with a median body mass index of 31 kg/m(2), the final model of FFM was FFM (kg)=0.432 (height, cm(2)/resistance, ohm)-0.086 (age, years)+0.269 (weight, kg)-6.422 (if female)+16.429. Adjusted R(2) was 0.94 and the root mean square error was 3.33 kg. The concordance was high (rc=0.97) between measured and predicted FFM across a wide range of FFM (31-85 kg).Conclusions In the context of the high burden of diabetes and CKD among adult Indigenous Australians, this new equation for FFM was both accurate and precise and based on easily acquired variables (height, weight, age, gender and resistance) among a heterogeneous adult cohort.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ejcn.2014.54

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hughes, J. T., Maple-Brown, L. J., Piers, L. S., Meerkin, J., O'Dea, K., & Ward, L. C.
Affiliations
  • Charles Darwin University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Ward, L C
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
2014-04-23
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
28-33
ISSN
  • 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5640
OpenAlex
W2083872786
Cited by
12
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Health and Education
Keywords
fat-free mass, prediction equations, Indigenous Australians, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, body composition, body resistance
MeSH terms
Adult, Australia, Body Composition, Body Height, Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Absorptiometry, Photon, Body Mass Index, Electric Impedance, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review