Cited by 16Body Composition Measurement TechniquesNutrition and Health in AgingElectrical and Bioimpedance Tomography

Development and cross-validation of predictive equations for fat-free mass and lean soft tissue mass by bioelectrical impedance in Brazilian women.

Costa, Roberto Fernandes da, Masset, Kalina Veruska da Silva Bezerra, Silva, Analiza M., Cabral, Breno Guilherme de Araújo Tinoco, Dantas, Paulo Moreira Silva·2022·European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background/objectives Bioelectrical impedance is one of the most used clinical techniques to assess body composition; however, it is necessary that the available predictive equations are valid for the evaluated subjects. This study aimed to develop and cross-validate equations for fat-free mass (FFM) and lean soft tissue mass (LSTM) by bioelectrical impedance for Brazilian women, in addition to test the validity of other available equations.Subjects/methods Cross-sectional study with 222 women aged 20-59 years, randomly divided into two groups: development and cross-validation. The standard technique for assessing fat mass, FFM and LSTM was dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Paired t test, multiple regression, and Bland-Altman plots were used to test the validity of the proposed models, as well as to perform cross-validation of the models.Results The equations derived in this study were: FFM = 16.284 + 0.442 × (Height 2/Resistance) - 0.13 × age + 0.302 × Weight - 0.121 × Waist Circumference; r 2 = 0.86; SEE = 2.32 kg; and LSTM = 14.732 + 0.427 × (Height 2/Resistance) - 0.125 × age + 0.291 × Weight - 0.115 × Waist Circumference; r 2 = 0.92; SEE = 2.29 kg. In addition, the new equation for FFM showed better agreement when compared to another equation developed for a Brazilian population.Conclusions The newly developed equations provide a valid FFM and LSTM estimation and are recommended for Brazilian women with similar characteristics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41430-021-00946-x

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Costa, R. F. D., Masset, K. V. D. S. B., Silva, A. M., Cabral, B. G. D. A. T., & Dantas, P. M. S.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (BR)
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
Corresponding author
Costa, Roberto Fernandes da
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
2021-07-06
Volume
76
Issue
2
Pages
288-296
ISSN
  • 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5640
OpenAlex
W3181199369
Cited by
16
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
Keywords
bioimpedance, fat-free mass, lean soft tissue mass, prediction equations, body composition, women, Brazilian women, equation validation, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Composition, Brazil, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Reproducibility of Results, Absorptiometry, Photon, Body Mass Index, Electric Impedance, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review