Cited by 1,400Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersGut microbiota and health

The Pancreatic Cancer Microbiome Promotes Oncogenesis by Induction of Innate and Adaptive Immune Suppression

Open access
Pushalkar, Smruti, Hundeyin, Mautin, Daley, Donnele, Zambirinis, Constantinos P., Kurz, Emma, Mishra, Ankita, Mohan, Navyatha, Aykut, Berk +25 more·2018·Cancer Discovery

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

We found that the cancerous pancreas harbors a markedly more abundant microbiome compared with normal pancreas in both mice and humans, and select bacteria are differentially increased in the tumorous pancreas compared with gut. Ablation of the microbiome protects against preinvasive and invasive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA), whereas transfer of bacteria from PDA-bearing hosts, but not controls, reverses tumor protection. Bacterial ablation was associated with immunogenic reprogramming of the PDA tumor microenvironment, including a reduction in myeloid-derived suppressor cells and an increase in M1 macrophage differentiation, promoting TH1 differentiation of CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T-cell activation. Bacterial ablation also enabled efficacy for checkpoint-targeted immunotherapy by upregulating PD-1 expression. Mechanistically, the PDA microbiome generated a tolerogenic immune program by differentially activating select Toll-like receptors in monocytic cells. These data suggest that endogenous microbiota promote the crippling immune-suppression characteristic of PDA and that the microbiome has potential as a therapeutic target in the modulation of disease progression. Significance: We found that a distinct and abundant microbiome drives suppressive monocytic cellular differentiation in pancreatic cancer via selective Toll-like receptor ligation leading to T-cell anergy. Targeting the microbiome protects against oncogenesis, reverses intratumoral immune tolerance, and enables efficacy for checkpoint-based immunotherapy. These data have implications for understanding immune suppression in pancreatic cancer and its reversal in the clinic. Cancer Discov; 8(4); 403–16. ©2018 AACR. See related commentary by Riquelme et al., p. 386. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 371

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-17-1134

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Microbes can translocate into solid tumors via various routes.

    “Microbes can translocate into solid tumors via various routes.”
  • Proteobacteria dominated the microbiome of pancreatic cancer, similarly to the normal duodenal microbiome.

    “In contrast, Proteobacteria dominated the microbiome of pancreatic cancer, similarly to the normal duodenal microbiome makeup (16, 17, 48, 49).”
  • Neurons can provide serine that supports mRNA translation in PDAC.

    “Neurons can also provide serine that functions to support mRNA translation in PDAC263”

    From Pancreatic cancer: Advances and challenges (2023) · cites this paper as [263]

  • Murine PDAC models show specific gut and tumor microbiomes, suggesting bacterial translocation from the intestine to the peritumoral milieu.

    “Pushalkar et al. detected specific gut and tumor microbiome in murine models of PDAC, suggesting potential bacterial translocation from the intestinal tract into the peritumoral milieu”

    From Tumor Microbiome Diversity and Composition Influence Pancreatic Cancer Outcomes (2019) · cites this paper as Pushalkar et al., 2018

  • Antibiotic bacterial ablation in an orthotopic PDAC mouse model reshapes the tumor microenvironment, induces T-cell activation, improves immune surveillance, and increases immunotherapy sensitivity.

    “Bacterial ablation with antibiotics in a PDAC orthotopic mouse model reshapes the tumor microenvironment, inducing T-cell activation, improving immune surveillance, and increasing sensitivity to immunotherapy.”

    From Tumor Microbiome Diversity and Composition Influence Pancreatic Cancer Outcomes (2019) · cites this paper as Pushalkar et al., 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pushalkar, S., Hundeyin, M., Daley, D., Zambirinis, C. P., Kurz, E., Mishra, A., Mohan, N., Aykut, B., Usyk, M., Torres, L. E., Werba, G., Zhang, K., Guo, Y., Li, Q., Akkad, N., Lall, S., Wadowski, B., Gutierrez, J., Kochen Rossi, J. A., Herzog, J. W., Diskin, B., Torres-Hernandez, A., Leinwand, J., Wang, W., Taunk, P. S., Savadkar, S., Janal, M., Saxena, A., Li, X., Cohen, D., Sartor, R. B., Saxena, D., & Miller, G.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • 2S. Arthur Localio Laboratory, Department of Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York.
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
Corresponding author
  • Saxena, Deepak
  • Miller, George
Venue
Cancer Discovery
Published
2018-04-01
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
403-416
ISSN
  • 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-8290
OpenAlex
W2790589159
Cited by
1,400
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 161 · 2025: 215 · 2024: 199 · 2023: 216 · 2022: 201 · 2021: 167 · 2020: 142 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 25
FWCI
38.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (P40OD010995, UL1TR001445)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA206105, R21CA175794, R01CA180277, R01CA168611, R21CA155649, P30CA016087)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007308)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK034987)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01DE025992)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, tumor immunosuppression, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, CD8+ T cell activation, Th1 differentiation, PD-1 expression, immune checkpoint inhibitors, Toll-like receptor signaling, monocytic cells, bacterial transfer, tumor microenvironment, T cell anergy
MeSH terms
Animals, Bacteria, Cell Differentiation, Female, Humans, Male, Monocytes, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Signal Transduction, Toll-Like Receptors, Mice, Carcinogenesis, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review