Cited by 64Memory and Neural MechanismsPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

Blocking human fear memory with the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor doxycycline

Open access
Bach, D R, Tzovara, A, Vunder, J·2018·Molecular Psychiatry

Abstract

Learning to predict threat is a fundamental ability of many biological organisms, and a laboratory model for anxiety disorders. Interfering with such memories in humans would be of high clinical relevance. On the basis of studies in cell cultures and slice preparations, it is hypothesised that synaptic remodelling required for threat learning involves the extracellular enzyme matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) 9. However, in vivo evidence for this proposal is lacking. Here we investigate human Pavlovian fear conditioning under the blood-brain barrier crossing MMP inhibitor doxycyline in a pre-registered, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. We find that recall of threat memory, measured with fear-potentiated startle 7 days after acquisition, is attenuated by ~60% in individuals who were under doxycycline during acquisition. This threat memory impairment is also reflected in increased behavioural surprise signals to the conditioned stimulus during subsequent re-learning, and already late during initial acquisition. Our findings support an emerging view that extracellular signalling pathways are crucially required for threat memory formation. Furthermore, they suggest novel pharmacological methods for primary prevention and treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/mp.2017.65

Cites

54 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar impairments of fear recall and additional enhancements of fear extinction are observed following acute antibiotic exposure in humans and rodents.

    “Similar impairments of fear recall and additional enhancements of fear extinction are observed following acute antibiotic exposure in humans and rodents (Bach et al., 2018;Davis et al., 2006;Rodrigues et al., 2014).”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Bach et al., 2018

    The Results report approximately 60% less threat-memory retention in the human doxycycline group than in the placebo group. They also explicitly report no difference between groups in extinction. This paper therefore supports the fear-recall impairment but not the claimed enhancement of extinction; its trial did not study rodents. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bach, D. R., Tzovara, A., & Vunder, J.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Bach, D R
Venue
Molecular Psychiatry
Published
2017-04-04
Volume
23
Issue
7
Pages
1584-1589
ISSN
  • 1359-4184 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5578
OpenAlex
W2604366285
Cited by
64
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Wellcome Trust (091593, 091593/Z/10/Z)
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (149586, 320030_1449586/1, 320030)
  • Universität Zürich (320030_1449586/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
doxycycline, MMP-9, fear memory, fear conditioning, fear-potentiated startle, memory reconsolidation, threat memory, blood-brain barrier, synaptic remodeling, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Conditioning, Classical, Double-Blind Method, Doxycycline, Fear, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Memory, Mental Recall, Reflex, Startle, Young Adult, Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review