Cited by 41Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorSocial Robot Interaction and HRIAction Observation and Synchronization

A human tendency to anthropomorphize is enhanced by oxytocin

Scheele, Dirk, Schwering, Christine, Elison, Jed T., Spunt, Robert, Maier, Wolfgang, Hurlemann, René·2015·European Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

In the course of human evolution, the brain has evolved into a highly sensitive detector of social signals. As a consequence of this socially driven adaptation, humans display a tendency to anthropomorphize, that is they attribute social meaning to non-social agents. The evolutionarily highly conserved hypothalamic peptide oxytocin (OXT) has been identified as a key factor attaching salience to socially relevant cues, but whether it contributes to spontaneous anthropomorphism is still elusive. In the present study involving 60 healthy female participants, we measured salivary OXT concentrations and explored the effect of a single intranasal dose of synthetic OXT (24 IU) or placebo (PLC) on anthropomorphic tendencies during participants׳ verbal descriptions of short video clips depicting socially and non-socially moving geometric shapes. Our results show that endogenous OXT concentrations at baseline positively correlated with the attribution of animacy to social stimuli. While intranasal OXT had no modulatory effect on arousal ratings and did not make the participants more talkative, the treatment boosted anthropomorphic descriptions specifically for social stimuli. In conclusion, we here provide first evidence indicating that spontaneous anthropomorphism in women is facilitated by oxytocin, thereby enabling a context-specific upregulation of the propensity to anthropomorphize environmental cues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.05.009

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scheele, D., Schwering, C., Elison, J. T., Spunt, R., Maier, W., & Hurlemann, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
  • Scheele, Dirk
  • Hurlemann, René
Venue
European Neuropsychopharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
25
Issue
10
Pages
1817-1823
ISSN
0924-977X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1957793368
Cited by
41
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
FWCI
9.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • DZNE Pub (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NEMO – Neuromodulation of Emotion
  • Ministry of Innovation, Science, Research & Technology
  • German State of North Rhine-Westphalia (MIWFT)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
anthropomorphism, oxytocin, social cognition, social signals, salivary oxytocin, intranasal oxytocin, women, verbal description
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Cognition, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Motion Perception, Oxytocin, Photic Stimulation, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychological Tests, Psychotropic Drugs, Saliva, Social Perception, Thinking, Verbal Behavior, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review