The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhanced partner preference in a promiscuous species by manipulating the expression of a single gene.
Abstract
The molecular mechanisms underlying the evolution of complex behaviour are poorly understood. The mammalian genus Microtus provides an excellent model for investigating the evolution of social behaviour. Prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) exhibit a monogamous social structure in nature, whereas closely related meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) are solitary and polygamous. In male prairie voles, both vasopressin and dopamine act in the ventral forebrain to regulate selective affiliation between adult mates, known as pair bond formation, as assessed by partner preference in the laboratory. The vasopressin V1a receptor (V1aR) is expressed at higher levels in the ventral forebrain of monogamous than in promiscuous vole species, whereas dopamine receptor distribution is relatively conserved between species. Here we substantially increase partner preference formation in the socially promiscuous meadow vole by using viral vector V1aR gene transfer into the ventral forebrain. We show that a change in the expression of a single gene in the larger context of pre-existing genetic and neural circuits can profoundly alter social behaviour, providing a potential molecular mechanism for the rapid evolution of complex social behaviour.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While achieving relationship satisfaction is a primary goal for most individuals, only 37% of couples claim to be very happy in their marriage [24].”
From Could intranasal oxytocin be used to enhance relationships? Research imperatives, clinical policy, and ethical considerations (2013) · cites this paper as [24]
In the citing paper
“Pair-bonded prairie voles spend more time with their partner than with the stranger, whereas non-monogamous meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) spend little time interacting with their partner or stranger [138].”
From The Neurobiology of Love and Pair Bonding from Human and Animal Perspectives (2023) · cites this paper as [138]
In the citing paper
“Conversely, viral-mediated increases in VP AVPR1a expression induce partner preferences and increase affiliative behaviors in male prairie voles that are sexually naïve and, interestingly, also lead to partner preference formation in non-monogamous meadow voles [138,146].”
From The Neurobiology of Love and Pair Bonding from Human and Animal Perspectives (2023) · cites this paper as [138]
In the citing paper
“Over-expressing the gene encoding the prairie vole AVPR1A, Avpr1a, in the ventral pallidum of male meadow voles using viral vector-mediated gene transfer results in the ability of this promiscuous species to display partner preferences [23].”
From The prairie vole: An emerging model organism for understanding the social brain (2010) · cites this paper as [23]
In the citing paper
“Viral-mediated Avpr1a receptor overexpression studies show that species differences in Avpr1a expression mediate species differences in social behavior, and variation in Avpr1a expression in the brain is related to microsatellite diversity in the gene's 5′ flanking region (151-154).”
From Oxytocin, Vasopressin, and Social Behavior: From Neural Circuits to Clinical Opportunities (2022) · cites this paper as [152]
Citations
Cites
Kleiman, D. G. (1977) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/409721 · Cited by 1,436
A role for central vasopressin in pair bonding in monogamous prairie voles
Winslow, J. T., Hastings, N., Carter, C. S., Harbaugh, C. R., & Insel, T. R. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/365545a0 · Cited by 948 · cited 1×
“Central administration of vasopressin facilitates each of these monogamous-typical behaviours in male prairie voles through V1aRs in the brai”
BackgroundBielsky, I. F., Hu, S.-B., Szegda, K. L., Westphal, H., & Young, L. J. (2004) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300360 · Cited by 531
Self-citationYoung, L. J., Nilsen, R., Waymire, K. G., MacGregor, G. R., & Insel, T. R. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/23475 · Cited by 488
Self-citationInsel, T., Wang, Z., & Ferris, C. (1994) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.14-09-05381.1994 · Cited by 454
Self-citationVasopressin and oxytocin receptors in the central nervous system
Tribollet, E., & Barberis, C. (1996) · Critical Reviews™ in Neurobiology · doi:10.1615/critrevneurobiol.v10.i1.60 · Cited by 399
Role of septal vasopressin innervation in paternal behavior in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster).
Wang, Z., Ferris, C. F., & De Vries, G. J. (1994) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.91.1.400 · Cited by 381
Self-citationA critical role for nucleus accumbens dopamine in partner-preference formation in male prairie voles
Aragona, B. J., Liu, Y., Curtis, J. T., Stephan, F. K., & Wang, Z. (2003) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-08-03483.2003 · Cited by 351
Self-citationGingrich, B., Liu, Y., Cascio, C., Wang, Z., & Insel, T. R. (2000) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.114.1.173 · Cited by 339
Self-citationVasopressin-dependent neural circuits underlying pair bond formation in the monogamous prairie vole
Lim, M. M., & Young, L. J. (2004) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2003.12.008 · Cited by 322
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Aragona, B. J. et al. Opposite modulation of social attachment by D1- and D2-type dopamine receptor activation in nucleus accumbens shell. Horm. Behav. 44, 37 (2003)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–638 of 638
Additional file 18 of Transcriptomic analysis of paternal behaviors in prairie voles
Duclot, F., Liu, Y., Saland, S. K., Wang, Z., & Kabbaj, M. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21258963
Self-citationAdditional file 13 of Transcriptomic analysis of paternal behaviors in prairie voles
Duclot, F., Liu, Y., Saland, S. K., Wang, Z., & Kabbaj, M. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21258945
Self-citationAdditional file 6 of Transcriptomic analysis of paternal behaviors in prairie voles
Duclot, F., Liu, Y., Saland, S. K., Wang, Z., & Kabbaj, M. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21259011
Self-citationAdditional file 20 of Transcriptomic analysis of paternal behaviors in prairie voles
Duclot, F., Liu, Y., Saland, S. K., Wang, Z., & Kabbaj, M. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21258972
Self-citationAdditional file 19 of Transcriptomic analysis of paternal behaviors in prairie voles
Duclot, F., Liu, Y., Saland, S. K., Wang, Z., & Kabbaj, M. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21258966
Self-citationAdditional file 28 of Transcriptomic analysis of paternal behaviors in prairie voles
Duclot, F., Liu, Y., Saland, S. K., Wang, Z., & Kabbaj, M. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21258996
Self-citationAdditional file 25 of Transcriptomic analysis of paternal behaviors in prairie voles
Duclot, F., Liu, Y., Saland, S. K., Wang, Z., & Kabbaj, M. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21258987
Self-citationAdditional file 1 of Transcriptomic analysis of paternal behaviors in prairie voles
Duclot, F., Liu, Y., Saland, S. K., Wang, Z., & Kabbaj, M. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21258969
Self-citationAdditional file 4 of Transcriptomic analysis of paternal behaviors in prairie voles
Duclot, F., Liu, Y., Saland, S. K., Wang, Z., & Kabbaj, M. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21259005
Self-citationTripp, J. A., Berrío, A., McGraw, L. A., Matz, M. V., Davis, J. K., Inoue, K., Thomas, J. W., Young, L. J., & Phelps, S. M. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14707895
Self-citationAdditional file 5 of Transcriptomic analysis of paternal behaviors in prairie voles
Duclot, F., Liu, Y., Saland, S. K., Wang, Z., & Kabbaj, M. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21259008
Self-citationAdditional file 24 of Transcriptomic analysis of paternal behaviors in prairie voles
Duclot, F., Liu, Y., Saland, S. K., Wang, Z., & Kabbaj, M. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21258984
Self-citationLishaugen, H. T. S. (2017) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives
Neural Mechanisms Underlying the Action Sequence of an Escape Response in Drosophila Larvae
Zhu, J. (2024) · eScholarship@McGill (McGill) · doi:10.82308/36464
Pair bonding, mating systems, and hormones in vertebrates
Laser, R. S., & Ophir, A. G. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-29068-8.00158-6
Monogamy: The Fidelity Brain Hypothesis
Bryson, K. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-08956-5_2530-1
The neural substrates of behavioral evolution: Divergent behaviors from conserved neurons
Kopp, A. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2530587122
Gumerova, A. A., Pevnev, G., Korkmaz, F., Cheliadinova, U., Burganova, G., Vasilyeva, D., Cullen, L., Barak, O., Sultana, F., Zhou, W., et al. (2026) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.105355.2
Social Development of the Naked Mole-Rat
Toor, I. (2024) · TSpace (University of Toronto)
Advancing insights into the neuroendocrine basis of socio-sexual interactions in mammals
Masoumparast, M., Fiset, J.-P., Nasri, N., & Silva, M. S. B. (2026) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/endocr/bqag036
Caractérisation d’outils pharmacologiques pour l’étude des récepteurs centraux de la vasopressine
Marir, R. (2013) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/547ee25cz6fbfz417azabc9z92de6a7a2fcc
Les corrélats cérébraux de la pédophilie : étude en imagerie par résonance magnétique fonctionnelle
Cazala, F. (2014) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/13a67060zb63bz4abcz96b9z50f2fbf50be2
Motevalli, D., Alfredson, R., Fogleman, S., Medrano, E., Chen, Y., Silander, W. I., Hige, T., Stern, U., & Yang, C.-H. (2026) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aed1338
Divergent spatiotemporal integration of whole-field visual motion in medaka and zebrafish larvaePreprint
Isoe, Y., Mabene, Y. F., Bind, M.-A., & Engert, F. (2026) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.111462
Divergent spatiotemporal integration of whole-field visual motion in medaka and zebrafish larvaePreprint
Isoe, Y., Mabene, Y. F., Bind, M.-A., & Engert, F. (2026) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.111462.1
Kean, C. E., Radchenko, E. A., Lindenbaum, N. M., Materne, G., & Mirkin, S. M. (2026) · NAR Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1093/narmme/ugag032
Neurobiology of pair-bonded sociality in prairie voles
Kudara, M., Suzuki, H., Ikegaya, Y., & Matsumoto, N. (2026) · Folia Pharmacologica Japonica · doi:10.1254/fpj.26033
Hasunuma, K., Horie, K., Yoshida, M., Nishimori, K., Onaka, T., & Sato, N. (2026) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2026.105968
de Courten, B., & Wallace, R. K. (2026) · Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/cns0000484
Barkan, C. L., Binder, L. A., Davis, B. A., Carbone, L., & Zornik, E. (2026) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00037.2026
Romantic love as regulatory co-option of maternal-bonding circuitry: a testable genetic account
Felesina, T., & Bode, A. (2026) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2026.1797790
Dimorphic substrates, monomorphic outcomes: Social behavior neural circuit tuning in social monogamy
Shvareva, V. A., Berendzen, K. M., Bender, K. J., & Manoli, D. S. (2026) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2026.102948 · Cited by 1
Evolution of social behavior and its neurobiological basis—where we began, and where we are going
Fuxjager, M. J., & Schuppe, E. R. (2026) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2026.103266
Kiyokawa, Y., Kan, R., & Takeuchi, Y. (2026) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2026.2742155
The question that wouldn’t die: A history of research on social interactions
Votinov, M. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-34080-2.00005-6
Roles of hormones in social interactions
Votinov, M. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-34080-2.00002-0
Manipulação Neonatal, Aprendizado Olfatório e Reprodução em Ratos
Raineki, C. (2006) · Americanae (AECID Library)
Metadata
- Authors
- Lim, M. M., Wang, Z., Olazábal, D. E., Ren, X., Terwilliger, E. F., & Young, L. J.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- Florida State University (US)
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Young, Larry J.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 429
- Issue
- 6993
- Pages
- 754-757
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2022927508
- Cited by
- 628
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 58.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- mate preferences, pair bonding, vasopressin V1a receptor, Microtus pennsylvanicus, Microtus ochrogaster, Microtus, evolution of social behavior, ventral forebrain, dopamine, viral gene delivery, monogamy, polygamy, promiscuity
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Choice Behavior, Arvicolinae, Female, Male, Pair Bond, Receptors, Dopamine, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Prosencephalon, Receptors, Vasopressin
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
