Cited by 489Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Increased affiliative response to vasopressin in mice expressing the V1a receptor from a monogamous vole

Young, Larry J., Nilsen, Roger, Waymire, Katrina G., MacGregor, Grant R., Insel, Thomas R.·1999·Nature

Abstract

Arginine vasopressin influences male reproductive and social behaviours in several vertebrate taxa through its actions at the V1a receptor in the brain. The neuroanatomical distribution of vasopressin V1a receptors varies greatly between species with different forms of social organization. Here we show that centrally administered arginine vasopressin increases affiliative behaviour in the highly social, monogamous prairie vole, but not in the relatively asocial, promiscuous montane vole. Molecular analyses indicate that gene duplication and/or changes in promoter structure of the prairie vole receptor gene may contribute to the species differences in vasopressin-receptor expression. We further show that mice that are transgenic for the prairie vole receptor gene have a neuroanatomical pattern of receptor binding that is similar to that of the prairie vole, and exhibit increased affiliative behaviour after injection with arginine vasopressin. These data indicate that the pattern of V1a-receptor gene expression in the brain may be functionally associated with species-typical social behaviours in male vertebrates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/23475

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Viral-mediated Avpr1a receptor overexpression studies show that species differences in Avpr1a expression mediate species differences in social behavior, and variation in Avpr1a expression in the brain is related to microsatellite diversity in the gene's 5' flanking region.

    “Viral-mediated Avpr1a receptor overexpression studies show that species differences in Avpr1a expression mediate species differences in social behavior, and variation in Avpr1a expression in the brain is related to microsatellite diversity in the gene's 5′ flanking region (151-154).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Young, L. J., Nilsen, R., Waymire, K. G., MacGregor, G. R., & Insel, T. R.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Nilsen, Roger
Venue
Nature
Published
1999-08
Volume
400
Issue
6746
Pages
766-768
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1556396873
Cited by
488
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 18
FWCI
39.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
vasopressin, V1a receptor, Microtus ochrogaster, montane vole, affiliative behavior, social behavior, monogamy, gene duplication, promoter structure, transgenic mice, receptor gene expression, species differences, social organization
MeSH terms
Animals, Arginine Vasopressin, Brain, Arvicolinae, Female, Male, Mice, Transgenic, Molecular Sequence Data, Pair Bond, Social Behavior, Species Specificity, Gene Expression, Receptors, Vasopressin, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review