Cited by 730Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research

IRF4 addiction in multiple myeloma

Open access
Shaffer, Arthur L., Emre, N. C. Tolga, Lamy, Laurence, Ngo, Vu N., Wright, George, Xiao, Wenming, Powell, John, Dave, Sandeep +6 more·2008·Nature

Abstract

The transcription factor IRF4 (interferon regulatory factor 4) is required during an immune response for lymphocyte activation and the generation of immunoglobulin-secreting plasma cells. Multiple myeloma, a malignancy of plasma cells, has a complex molecular aetiology with several subgroups defined by gene expression profiling and recurrent chromosomal translocations. Moreover, the malignant clone can sustain multiple oncogenic lesions, accumulating genetic damage as the disease progresses. Current therapies for myeloma can extend survival but are not curative. Hence, new therapeutic strategies are needed that target molecular pathways shared by all subtypes of myeloma. Here we show, using a loss-of-function, RNA-interference-based genetic screen, that IRF4 inhibition is toxic to myeloma cell lines, regardless of transforming oncogenic mechanism. Gene expression profiling and genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis uncovered an extensive network of IRF4 target genes and identified MYC as a direct target of IRF4 in activated B cells and myeloma. Unexpectedly, IRF4 was itself a direct target of MYC transactivation, generating an autoregulatory circuit in myeloma cells. Although IRF4 is not genetically altered in most myelomas, they are nonetheless addicted to an aberrant IRF4 regulatory network that fuses the gene expression programmes of normal plasma cells and activated B cells.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature07064

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Targeted degradation of IKZF1 and IKZF3 by iMiDs exerts a dual response in multiple myeloma: anti-proliferative effects via IRF4 destabilization and immune enhancement via increased cytokine production.

    “the targeted degradation of iKZF1 and iKZF3 by iMiDs exerts a dual response in the treatment of multiple myeloma.First, the dependency of these cancers on iRF4 signaling is well-documented, making it unsurprising that the destabilization of iRF4, through the destruction of iKZF1 and iKZF3, would lead to anti-proliferative effects (Shaffer et al. 2008).Second, iKZF1 plays an important role in”

    From From serendipity to strategy: molecular glue degraders in cancer therapeutics (2025) · cites this paper as Shaffer et al. 2008

    The cited passage (indexed as Abstract; page unavailable) shows that myeloma cell lines depend on IRF4 and that IRF4 knockdown kills them. It does not establish that iMiDs degrade IKZF1/IKZF3, destabilize IRF4, or produce the proposed anti-proliferative effect through that pathway. The citation appears before the citing text turns to its second, immune-related response, so cytokine production is not attributed to this source here. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • IRF4 and c-Myc work together in a positive-feedback loop to drive gene expression profiles associated with myeloma progression.

    “iRF4 and c-Myc work together in a positive-feedback loop to drive gene expression profiles associated with myeloma progression (Shaffer et al. 2008;Bjorklund et al. 2015).”

    From From serendipity to strategy: molecular glue degraders in cancer therapeutics (2025) · cites this paper as Shaffer et al. 2008

    The Abstract describes a positive regulatory loop in which IRF4 and MYC reinforce each other’s expression and an aberrant, malignancy-specific gene-expression program controlled by IRF4. It does not establish that this loop drives profiles specifically associated with myeloma progression, rather than myeloma more generally. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. [2]Klein U, et al. Transcription factor IRF4 controls plasma cell differentiation and class-switch recombination. Nat Immunol. 2006;7:773–82. doi: 10.1038/ni1357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  2. [3]Sciammas R, et al. Graded expression of interferon regulatory factor-4 coordinates isotype switching with plasma cell differentiation. Immunity. 2006;25:225–36. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  3. [4]Zhan F, et al. The molecular classification of multiple myeloma. Blood. 2006;108:2020–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-11-013458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  4. [5]Bergsagel PL, et al. Promiscuous translocations into immunoglobulin heavy chain switch regions in multiple myeloma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:13931–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  5. [6]Kuehl WM, Bergsagel PL. Multiple myeloma: evolving genetic events and host interactions. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:175–87. doi: 10.1038/nrc746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  6. [7]Carrasco DR, et al. High-resolution genomic profiles define distinct clinicopathogenetic subgroups of multiple myeloma patients. Cancer Cell. 2006;9:313–25. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  7. [8]Barlogie B, et al. Treatment of multiple myeloma. Blood. 2004;103:20–32. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-04-1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  8. [9]Mitsiades CS, Mitsiades N, Munshi NC, Anderson KC. Focus on multiple myeloma. Cancer Cell. 2004;6:439–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  9. [10]Ngo VN, et al. A loss-of-function RNA interference screen for molecular targets in cancer. Nature. 2006;441:106–10. doi: 10.1038/nature04687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  10. [11]Davis RE, Brown KD, Siebenlist U, Staudt LM. Constitutive Nuclear Factor kappaB Activity Is Required for Survival of Activated B Cell-like Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Cells. J Exp Med. 2001;194:1861–1874. doi: 10.1084/jem.194.12.1861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  11. [13]Gutierrez NC, et al. Gene expression profiling of B lymphocytes and plasma cells from Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia: comparison with expression patterns of the same cell counterparts from chronic lymphocytic leukemia, multiple myeloma and normal individuals. Leukemia. 2007;21:541–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  12. [14]Tamura T, et al. IFN regulatory factor-4 and -8 govern dendritic cell subset development and their functional diversity. J Immunol. 2005;174:2573–81. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.5.2573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  13. [15]Su AI, et al. A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:6062–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400782101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  14. [16]Shou Y, et al. Diverse karyotypic abnormalities of the c-myc locus associated with c-myc dysregulation and tumor progression in multiple myeloma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:228–33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.1.228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  15. [17]Zeller KI, et al. Global mapping of c-Myc binding sites and target gene networks in human B cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:17834–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604129103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  16. [18]Guney I, Wu S, Sedivy JM. Reduced c-Myc signaling triggers telomere-independent senescence by regulating Bmi-1 and p16(INK4a) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:3645–50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600069103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  17. [21]Dib A, Gabrea A, Glebov O, Bergsagel PL, Kuehl WM. Characterization of MYC translocations in multiple myeloma cell lines. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgn011. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  18. [22]Liu J, Levens D. Making myc. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2006;302:1–32. doi: 10.1007/3-540-32952-8_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  19. [23]Garraway LA, Sellers WR. Lineage dependency and lineage-survival oncogenes in human cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:593–602. doi: 10.1038/nrc1947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  20. [24]Solimini NL, Luo J, Elledge SJ. Non-oncogene addiction and the stress phenotype of cancer cells. Cell. 2007;130:986–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  21. [25]Hauf S, et al. Dissociation of cohesin from chromosome arms and loss of arm cohesion during early mitosis depends on phosphorylation of SA2. PLoS Biol. 2005;3:e69. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  22. [26]Ge H, Roeder RG. Purification, cloning, and characterization of a human coactivator, PC4, that mediates transcriptional activation of class II genes. Cell. 1994;78:513–23. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90428-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  23. [28]Polo JM, et al. Specific peptide interference reveals BCL6 transcriptional and oncogenic mechanisms in B-cell lymphoma cells. Nat Med. 2004;10:1329–35. doi: 10.1038/nm1134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  24. [29]Alizadeh AA, et al. Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature. 2000;403:503–511. doi: 10.1038/35000501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shaffer, A. L., Emre, N. C. T., Lamy, L., Ngo, V. N., Wright, G., Xiao, W., Powell, J., Dave, S., Yu, X., Zhao, H., Zeng, Y., Chen, B., Epstein, J., & Staudt, L. M.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Staudt, Louis M.
Venue
Nature
Published
2008-06-22
Volume
454
Issue
7201
Pages
226-231
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1981403111
Cited by
730
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 40
FWCI
24.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (Z99 CA999999)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA113992, CA 97513, CA113992, R33CA097513)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Keywords
IRF4, multiple myeloma, non-oncogene addiction, c-Myc, transcriptional autoregulation, plasma cell differentiation, activated B cells, gene regulatory networks, therapeutic target, RNAi screen, chromatin immunoprecipitation, gene expression profiling
MeSH terms
Interferon Regulatory Factor-4, Animals, B-Lymphocytes, Cell Survival, Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, Cells, Cultured, Humans, Multiple Myeloma, Transcriptional Activation, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Genes, myc, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc, Gene Expression Profiling, RNA Interference, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, Interferon Regulatory Factors, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review