The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Testing the speed of ‘spooky action at a distance’
Open accessAbstract
Correlations are generally described by one of two mechanisms: either a first event influences a second one by sending information encoded in bosons or other physical carriers, or the correlated events have some common causes in their shared history. Quantum physics predicts an entirely different kind of cause for some correlations, named entanglement. This reveals itself in correlations that violate Bell inequalities (implying that they cannot be described by common causes) between space-like separated events (implying that they cannot be described by classical communication). Many Bell tests have been performed, and loopholes related to locality and detection have been closed in several independent experiments. It is still possible that a first event could influence a second, but the speed of this hypothetical influence (Einstein’s ‘spooky action at a distance’) would need to be defined in some universal privileged reference frame and be greater than the speed of light. Here we put stringent experimental bounds on the speed of all such hypothetical influences. We performed a Bell test over more than 24 hours between two villages separated by 18 km and approximately east–west oriented, with the source located precisely in the middle. We continuously observed two-photon interferences well above the Bell inequality threshold. Taking advantage of the Earth’s rotation, the configuration of our experiment allowed us to determine, for any hypothetically privileged frame, a lower bound for the speed of the influence. For example, if such a privileged reference frame exists and is such that the Earth’s speed in this frame is less than 10-3 times that of the speed of light, then the speed of the influence would have to exceed that of light by at least four orders of magnitude.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories
Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A., & Holt, R. A. (1969) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.23.880 · Cited by 7,573
A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of "Hidden" Variables. I
Bohm, D. (1952) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.85.166 · Cited by 5,510
Aspect, A., Grangier, P., & Roger, G. (1982) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.49.91 · Cited by 2,687
A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of "Hidden" Variables. II
Bohm, D. (1952) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.85.180 · Cited by 2,052
Violation of Bell's Inequality under Strict Einstein Locality Conditions
Weihs, G., Jennewein, T., Simon, C., Weinfurter, H., & Zeilinger, A. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.5039 · Cited by 1,643
Bell inequality for position and time
Franson, J. D. (1989) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.62.2205 · Cited by 1,168
Experimental violation of a Bell's inequality with efficient detection
Rowe, M. A., Kielpinski, D., Meyer, V., Sackett, C. A., Itano, W. M., Monroe, C., & Wineland, D. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35057215 · Cited by 1,043
Violation of Bell Inequalities by Photons More Than 10 km Apart
Tittel, W., Brendel, J., Zbinden, H., & Gisin, N. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.3563 · Cited by 963
Self-citationHiley, B. J. (1993) · Taylor & Francis eBooks · Cited by 825
Possibility of Faster-Than-Light Particles
Feinberg, G. (1967) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.159.1089 · Cited by 650
Cited by
Brunner, N., Cavalcanti, D., Pironio, S., Scarani, V., & Wehner, S. (2014) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.419 · Cited by 2,688
Overcoming noise in entanglement distribution
Ecker, S., Bouchard, F., Bulla, L., Brandt, F., Kohout, O., Steinlechner, F., Fickler, R., Malik, M., Guryanova, Y., Ursin, R., et al. (2019) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.041042 · Cited by 288
Applications of single photons to quantum communication and computing
Couteau, C., Barz, S., Durt, T., Gerrits, T., Huwer, J., Prevedel, R., Rarity, J., Shields, A., & Weihs, G. (2023) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00583-2 · Cited by 216
Nonseparable States of Light: From Quantum to Classical
Shen, Y., & Rosales‐Guzmán, C. (2022) · Laser & Photonics Reviews · doi:10.1002/lpor.202100533 · Cited by 160
Transport of orbital-angular-momentum entanglement through a turbulent atmosphere
Pors, B.-J., Monken, C. H., Eliel, E. R., & Woerdman, J. P. (2011) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.19.006671 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Salart, D., Baas, A., Branciard, C., Gisin, N., & Zbinden, H.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 454
- Issue
- 7206
- Pages
- 861-864
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2049259066
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 12.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Testing the speed of ‘spooky action at a distance’. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature07121
- The paper
- Salart, D., Baas, A., Branciard, C., Gisin, N., & Zbinden, H. (2008). Testing the speed of ‘spooky action at a distance’. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07121
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.