Cited by 6,092DNA Repair MechanismsEffects of Radiation ExposureCancer-related Molecular Pathways

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 106 of the 106 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease

Open access
Jackson, Stephen P., Bartek, Jiri·2009·Nature

Abstract

The prime objective for every life form is to deliver its genetic material, intact and unchanged, to the next generation. This must be achieved despite constant assaults by endogenous and environmental agents on the DNA. To counter this threat, life has evolved several systems to detect DNA damage, signal its presence and mediate its repair. Such responses, which have an impact on a wide range of cellular events, are biologically significant because they prevent diverse human diseases. Our improving understanding of DNA-damage responses is providing new avenues for disease management.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature08467

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 6,092

Metadata

Authors
Jackson, S. P., & Bartek, J.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Jackson, Stephen P.
Venue
Nature
Published
2009-10-22
Volume
461
Issue
7267
Pages
1071-1078
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2145200068
Cited by
6,092
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 344 · 2025: 369 · 2024: 417 · 2023: 469 · 2022: 489 · 2021: 511 · 2020: 448 · 2019: 416 · 2018: 344 · 2017: 402 · 2016: 381 · 2015: 338 · 2014: 310 · 2013: 279 · 2012: 241
FWCI
14.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Foundation for Cancer Research
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Cancer Research UK (A5290)
  • European Commission
  • Danmarks Grundforskningsfond
  • Dansk Kræftforsknings Fond
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
Keywords
DNA damage response, DNA repair, DNA damage detection, ionizing radiation, environmental chemicals, endogenous DNA damage, signal transduction, disease prevention, genotoxicity
MeSH terms
Cell Cycle, Disease, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, Humans, Signal Transduction, Genome, Human

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review