The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research
Open accessAbstract
Deficiencies in methods reporting in animal experimentation lead to difficulties in reproducing experiments; the authors propose a set of reporting standards to improve scientific communication and study design. Animal studies have contributed immensely to our understanding of diseases and assist the development of new therapies, but inadequate experimental reporting can sometimes render such studies difficult to reproduce and to translate into the clinic. This year, a US National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke workshop addressed this issue, and its conclusions are discussed in a Perspective piece in this issue of Nature. The main workshop recommendation is that at a minimum, studies should report on randomization, blinding, sample-size estimation and how the data were handled. The US National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke convened major stakeholders in June 2012 to discuss how to improve the methodological reporting of animal studies in grant applications and publications. The main workshop recommendation is that at a minimum studies should report on sample-size estimation, whether and how animals were randomized, whether investigators were blind to the treatment, and the handling of data. We recognize that achieving a meaningful improvement in the quality of reporting will require a concerted effort by investigators, reviewers, funding agencies and journal editors. Requiring better reporting of animal studies will raise awareness of the importance of rigorous study design to accelerate scientific progress.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In a hypothesis-testing study powered to detect an effect on the primary outcome measure, data on secondary outcomes are used to evaluate additional effects of the intervention, but subsequent statistical analysis of secondary outcome measures may be underpowered, making results and interpretation less reliable [88,93].”
From Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0 (2020) · cites this paper as [93]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In contrast, greater use of measures to control risk of bias in animal experiments, such as randomization and blinding (Landis et al., 2012), was correlated with greater effect size decreases in replications.”
From Estimating the replicability of Brazilian biomedical science (2025) · cites this paper as Landis et al., 2012
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Other factors have been identified that could improve replicability, such as blinding, randomization, and sample size planning (Landis et al., 2012; Macleod and Mohan, 2019).”
From Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology (2021) · cites this paper as Landis et al., 2012
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The low replication success rates and small effect sizes we found reinforce prior calls for improving the rigor and transparency of preclinical research to improve the allocation of limited resources and to protect human participants from being enrolled in trials that are based on weak evidence”
From Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology (2021) · cites this paper as Landis et al., 2012
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“By providing a comprehensive set of recommendations that are specifically tailored to the description of in vivo research, they help authors reporting animal experiments adhere to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) standards [43] and the minimum standards framework and checklist (Materials, Design, Analysis and Reporting [MDAR] [47]).”
From The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research (2020) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“The standards have been adopted by the National Institutes of Health (8,70).”
From Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data (2016) · cites this paper as [70]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
the CONSORT Group, Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-18 · Cited by 13,371
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 · Cited by 10,505
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
Moher, D., Hopewell, S., Schulz, K. F., Montori, V., Gotzsche, P. C., Devereaux, P. J., Elbourne, D., Egger, M., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c869 · Cited by 8,883
Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research
Kilkenny, C., Browne, W. J., Cuthill, I. C., Emerson, M., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412 · Cited by 7,300
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611417632 · Cited by 6,567
Improving bioscience research reporting: The ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research
Kilkenny, C., Browne, W. J., Cuthill, I. C., Emerson, M., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics · doi:10.4103/0976-500x.72351 · Cited by 6,277
Schulz (1995) · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520290060030 · Cited by 5,634
Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04337-3 · Cited by 5,373
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · CHANCE · doi:10.1080/09332480.2005.10722754 · Cited by 4,702
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,001
La reproducibilidad de las investigaciones biomédicas: Quo vadis?
Dal‐Ré, R., Bernad, A., & Garesse, R. (2016) · Medicina Clínica · doi:10.1016/j.medcli.2015.11.029 · Cited by 3
Effects of bumetanide on neonatal seizures: A systematic review of animal and human studies
Rao, S. C., Farhat, A., Rakshasbhuvankar, A. A., Athikarisamy, S. E., Ghosh, S., & Nagarajan, L. (2023) · Seizure · doi:10.1016/j.seizure.2023.09.007 · Cited by 3
Eberle, M. J., Thorkelsson, A. B., Liddle, L. J., Almekhlafi, M., & Colbourne, F. (2023) · Therapeutic Hypothermia and Temperature Management · doi:10.1089/ther.2023.0042 · Cited by 3
Future of Regulatory Safety Assessment
Bode, G., Starck-Lantova, P., & Kramer, P.-J. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-73317-9_142-1 · Cited by 3
Pre-clinical disease models in drug toxicity evaluation
Foster, M. L. (2017) · Current Opinion in Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.cotox.2017.06.001 · Cited by 3
Gspörer, I., & Schrems, B. M. (2017) · Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen · doi:10.1016/j.zefq.2017.11.006 · Cited by 3
Learning from Principles of Evidence-Based Medicine to Optimize Nonclinical Research Practices
Lefevre, I. A., & Balice‐Gordon, R. J. (2019) · Handbook of experimental pharmacology · doi:10.1007/164_2019_276 · Cited by 3
Sahoo, S. S., Valdez, J., Rueschman, M., & Kim, M. J. (2019) · Studies in health technology and informatics · doi:10.3233/shti190237 · Cited by 4
Preclinical Strategies for Testing of Targeted Radiosensitizers
Lin, S. H., Ye, R., & Wang, Y. (2020) · Cancer drug discovery and develogment/Cancer drug discovery and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49701-9_5 · Cited by 3
Preclinical target validation for non-addictive therapeutics development for pain
Hargreaves, R., Akinsanya, K., Ajit, S. K., Dhruv, N. T., Driscoll, J., Farina, P., Gavva, N. R., Gill, M., Houghton, A. K., Iyengar, S., et al. (2022) · Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets · doi:10.1080/14728222.2022.2147063 · Cited by 3
Self-citationWilliams, M. B., Green, G. B. H., Palmer, J. W., Fay, C., Chehade, S. B., Lawrence, A. L., Barry, R. J., Powell, M. L., Harris, M. L., & Watts, S. A. (2023) · Current Developments in Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.cdnut.2023.102057 · Cited by 3
NINDS Translational Programs: Priming the Pump of Neurotherapeutics Discovery and Development
Ranganathan, R. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.026 · Cited by 3
Found in Translation: Training the Next Generation of Translational Neuroscientists
Jensen, F. E., & Amara, S. G. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.043 · Cited by 3
Self-citationA Single-Unit Design Structure and Gender Differences in the Swimming World Championships
Pushkar, S., Issurin, V. B., & Verbitsky, O. (2014) · Journal of Human Kinetics · doi:10.2478/hukin-2014-0075 · Cited by 3
Experimental Planning and Execution
Mullane, K., Curtis, M. J., & Williams, M. J. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-804725-5.00002-1 · Cited by 3
Incorporating Data Citation in a Biomedical Repository: An Implementation Use Case.
Gupta, S., Zabarovskaya, C., Romine, B., Vianello, D. A., Vitale, C. H., & McIntosh, L. D. (2017) · PubMed Central · Cited by 3
Transparent reporting of experimental parameters in assays measuring phenotypic steps in metastasis
Boiy, R., Steenbrugge, J., Deun, J. V., Hendrix, A., Meyer, E., & Wever, O. D. (2018) · Clinical & Experimental Metastasis · doi:10.1007/s10585-018-9944-4 · Cited by 3
Maintaining an Effective Lab Notebook and Data Integrity
Murphy, A. J. (2019) · Success in academic surgery · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-14644-3_4 · Cited by 3
Vatner, R. E., James, C. D., Sathiaseelan, V., Bondra, K. M., Kalapurakal, J. A., & Houghton, P. J. (2020) · Pediatric Blood & Cancer · doi:10.1002/pbc.28439 · Cited by 3
Bittlinger, M., Schwietering, J., & Strech, D. (2021) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2021.06.007 · Cited by 3
Gao, F., Wahl, J., & Floyd, T. F. (2022) · Pediatric Anesthesia · doi:10.1111/pan.14401 · Cited by 3
The Methodologists: a Unique Category of Scientific Actors
Nelson, N. C. (2020) · Engaging Science Technology and Society · doi:10.17351/ests2020.345 · Cited by 3
Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury
Lerouet, D., Besson, V. C., & Plotkine, M. (2014) · Methods and principles in medicinal chemistry · doi:10.1002/9783527679348.ch17 · Cited by 5
Publishing rigor: An extension of scientific rigor
Baskin, P. K., & Gross, R. A. (2014) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000000608 · Cited by 3
Self-citationSnow, D. (2014) · Neural Regeneration Research · doi:10.4103/1673-5374.125323 · Cited by 3
Transparency, Reproducibility, and Validation
Roberts, J., & Shamseer, L. (2015) · Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology · doi:10.1097/wno.0000000000000219 · Cited by 3
A fully objective Bayesian approach for the Behrens-Fisher problem using historical studiesPreprint
Barbieri, A., Marin, J., & Florin, K. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.06873 · Cited by 3
Slattengren, E. (2020) · University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota) · Cited by 3
Kang, D., Zhang, F., Yang, Y., Liu, C., Xiao, J., Long, Y., Huang, J., Peng, X., Wang, W., Wang, X., et al. (2021) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.02.16.21251872 · Cited by 3
From novice to expert: preparing your peer review
Proctor, D. M., Abraham, R., & Esher, S. K. (2025) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00430-25 · Cited by 3
Processing of computer algorithms for traceability identification in scientific research
Fraga, H. C. D. J. R., Machado, V. D. O., Reina, J., Santos, A. M., Oliveira, B. S., & Souza, A. C. D. S. (2024) · Revista de Gestão e Secretariado (Management and Administrative Professional Review) · doi:10.7769/gesec.v15i7.3887 · Cited by 2
Wood, J., & van Schalkwyk, I. (2025) · Journal of Transportation Technologies · doi:10.4236/jtts.2025.151010 · Cited by 2
Orbitofrontal cortex spontaneously recovers latent information about outcomes upon devaluation
Hart, E. E., Bahena, L., & Schoenbaum, G. M. (2025) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2025.07.083 · Cited by 2
Xie, Y., Ding, N., Sun, J., Jin, X., Zhang, X., Sun, J., Xu, H., Bing, H., Guan, L., Li, Y., et al. (2025) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2025.107060 · Cited by 2
An aging-sensitive secreted phospholipase confers neuroprotection and cognitive resilience
Vicidomini, C., Goode, T. D., Yu, R., Mehta, I. K., McAvoy, K. M., Beveridge, C. H., Randolph, C. E., Iyer, S. N., Victor, M. B., Leary, N., et al. (2026) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-026-02465-z · Cited by 2
La experimentación animal y el progreso de la medicina
Pons, J. M. V., Permanyer-Miralda, G., Camı́, J., & Rodés, J. (2014) · Medicina Clínica · doi:10.1016/j.medcli.2014.03.021 · Cited by 2
CCR3 Expression in Relation to Delayed Microbleeds in a Rat Model of Large Vessel Occlusion
Claypoole, S. M., Frank, J. A., Messmer, S. J., & Pennypacker, K. R. (2024) · Journal of Experimental Neurology · doi:10.33696/neurol.5.082 · Cited by 2
Charrier, M., Leroux, I., Pichon, J., Schleder, C., Larcher, T., Hamel, A., Magot, A., Péréon, Y., Lamirault, G., Tremblay, J. P., et al. (2024) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1093/jnen/nlae044 · Cited by 2
Mahan, S., Liu, M., Baylis, R. A., & Gomez, D. A. (2019) · Journal of Visualized Experiments · doi:10.3791/59139 · Cited by 2
Halim, A. B. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-816121-0.00011-8 · Cited by 2
GLP: A requirement in cell therapies - perspectives for the cardiovascular field
Ruch, U., Skorska, A., Lemcke, H., Steinhoff, G., & David, R. (2020) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.04.003 · Cited by 2
Vergov, B., Sbirkov, Y., Minchev, D. S., Todorova, T., Baldzhieva, A., Burnusuzov, H. A., Spasova, M., & Sarafian, V. S. (2024) · Biology Methods and Protocols · doi:10.1093/biomethods/bpae042 · Cited by 2
Li, J., Bi, X., Hou, C., Jin, Y., Shang, M., Wu, X. O., & Liang, L. (2024) · European Journal of Integrative Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.eujim.2024.102399 · Cited by 2
Exosomes as nanocarrier for Neurotherapy: Journey from application to challenges
Ale, Y., & Nainwal, N. (2024) · Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2024.106312 · Cited by 2
Experimental animal models of cerebral small vessel disease
Hainsworth, A. H., & Markus, H. S. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139382694.006 · Cited by 2
Strategies to Enhance Medical Countermeasures After the Use of Chemical Warfare Agents on Civilians
Jett, D. A., & Yeung, D. T. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-800159-2.00070-1 · Cited by 2
Validation of C1/2 Transarticular Screws in a Meta-Analysis After the Fact
Wang, M. Y. (2013) · World Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2013.03.018 · Cited by 2
Therapy Development For Neuromuscular Diseases: Translating Hope Into Promise
Bertoni, C. (2013) · Future Neurology · doi:10.2217/fnl.13.29 · Cited by 2
Basic Science, RDoC, and Schizophrenia Bulletin
Shepard, D. S. (2014) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbu077 · Cited by 2
Assessing Toxicity of Nanoparticles: In Vitro and In Vivo Assays
Jo, D. H., Kim, J. H., Lee, T. G., & Kim, J. H. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15338-4_41 · Cited by 2
A Bayesian multi-stage cost-effectiveness design for animal studies in stroke research
Cai, C. C., Ning, J., & Huang, X. (2016) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280216657853 · Cited by 2
Physical exercise for brain health in later life: how does it work?
Lampit, A., Duffy, S. L., & Valenzuela, M. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316157565.011 · Cited by 2
Behavioral Medicine and the Benefits of Healthcare: A Critical Appraisal and the Need for Exnovation
Kaplan, R. M., Chambers, D., & Glasgow, R. E. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-93826-4_36 · Cited by 2
Iordanou, K. (2019) · Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics · doi:10.1017/s0963180119000252 · Cited by 2
The imperative to find the courage to redesign the biomedical research enterprise
Bielekova, B., & Brownlee, S. (2021) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.53654.1 · Cited by 3
Bertolo, R. G., Cipriani, C., Vittori, M., Carilli, M., Maiorino, F., Iacovelli, V., Ganini, C., Antonucci, M., Signoretti, M., Petta, F., et al. (2022) · BMC Urology · doi:10.1186/s12894-022-00974-0 · Cited by 2
Assessing Toxicity of Nanoparticles: In Vitro and In Vivo Assays
Jo, D. H., Kim, J. H., Lee, T. G., & Kim, J. H. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13188-7_41-1 · Cited by 2
Best practices for epigenome-wide DNA modification data collection and analysis
Kochmanski, J. J., & Bernstein, A. I. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-817218-6.00006-1 · Cited by 2
Piękniewska, A., Anderson, N., Roelandse, M., Lloyd, K. C. K., Korf, I. F., Voss, S. R., de Castro, G. M., Magnani, D. M., Varga, Z. M., James‐Zorn, C., et al. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0327344 · Cited by 2
Guindalini, C., & Oliveira, M. M. (2017) · Vigilância Sanitária em Debate · doi:10.22239/2317-269x.00875 · Cited by 2
Data visualizations to detect systematic errors in laboratory assay results
Lötsch, J. (2017) · Pharmacology Research & Perspectives · doi:10.1002/prp2.369 · Cited by 2
The Virtues and Limitations of Randomized Experiments
Baetu, T. M. (2021) · Acta Analytica · doi:10.1007/s12136-021-00497-7 · Cited by 2
Perspectives on preclinical evidence for translation in SCI
Reier, P. J., Lane, M. A., & Zholudeva, L. V. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818662-6.00001-7 · Cited by 2
Fowlkes, D. M. (1990) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1093/clinchem/36.7.1385 · Cited by 2
Aydıngöz, S. E., Efe, O. E., & Çalışkan, G. (2022) · Journal of Research in Pharmacy · doi:10.29228/jrp.168 · Cited by 2
Guidelines on design and statistics for Appetite
Geary, N., & Higgs, S. (2015) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.045 · Cited by 2
Letter from the Editor-in-Chief: Irreproducible Results
Kuhar, M. J. (2014) · Journal of Drug and Alcohol Research · doi:10.4303/jdar/235879 · Cited by 2
Schmidt, D., Galanopoulou, A. S., Mathern, G. W., & Wang, X. (2016) · Epilepsia Open · doi:10.1002/epi4.12007 · Cited by 2
Best Practices for Clinical and Translational Research and Implementation
Kroetz, D. L. (2016) · Clinical and Translational Science · doi:10.1111/cts.12411 · Cited by 2
Onward and upward with transparent research reporting
Adams, J. C. (2017) · American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00045.2017 · Cited by 2
Behavioral analyses of animal models of intellectual and developmental disabilities
Crawley, J. N., Fagiolini, M., Harrison, F. E., Samaco, R. C., Wozniak, D. F., & Robinson, M. B. (2019) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2019.107087 · Cited by 2
Building the Evidence Base for Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Marklund, N., Plesnila, N., & Brody, D. L. (2021) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2021.29107.editorial · Cited by 2
Anderson, D., Hinchcliffe, J. K., Jackson, M. G., & Robinson, E. S. J. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.10.25.684561 · Cited by 2
Design of procedures and projects
Fry, D., Smith, A. J., Storey, J., Bate, S. T., & Ritskes-Hoitinga, M. J. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-821180-9.00002-7 · Cited by 1
From “No Difference” to “Trending”: misinterpretation of statistical analysis in animal studies
Sharifan, A. (2025) · Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00210-025-04440-0 · Cited by 1
Le, P. N., Keysar, S. B., Miller, B., Morton, J. J., Chimed, T.-S., Alzofon, N., Nieto, C., Davies, K. D., Thomas, C. M., Weaver, A. N., et al. (2025) · Molecular Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1002/mc.70025 · Cited by 1
In vivo growth trajectories of regional brain volumes in the Wistar rat
Zhao, Q., & Zahr, N. M. (2025) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2025.08.005 · Cited by 1
Zhang, X., Hu, K., Xue, J., Wang, Z., Jiang, Y., Zou, Z., Yang, J., Jiao, M., Yang, S., Shen, Y., et al. (2025) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/d5ra02062j · Cited by 1
Santos, T. K. B., Lima, N. T., Passos, F. R. S., Lima, P. D. S. S., Quintans‐Júnior, L. J., Barreto, R. D. S. S., & Quintans, J. D. S. S. (2025) · Inflammopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s10787-025-01969-7 · Cited by 1
Effect of Statins on Wound Healing. A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Preclinical Evidence
Pachano-Bravo, A., Ganesan, O., Mueller, S., & Orgill, D. P. (2026) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1111/wrr.70133 · Cited by 1
Mazoit, J., & Gonin, P. (2026) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2026.1786234 · Cited by 1
Adherence of CLAIM in Artificial Intelligence Research: A Cross‐Sectional Study
Gao, C., Zhang, Y., Zhao, R., Liao, Z., Zhang, X., Yang, W., Wang, Y., Zhang, B., Zhang, Y., & Li, N. (2026) · Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1111/jebm.70141 · Cited by 1
Xiang, W., Lei, Y., Xiang, H., Yang, Y., Jing, F., Xiong, L., Zhou, X., Wang, J., & Zhang, A. (2026) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2026.123829 · Cited by 1
Mardale, G., Prodea, A., Munteanu, A. M., Jorgovan, M., Mardale, S., Dumitrascu, V. C., & Şoica, C. (2025) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph19010077 · Cited by 1
Aartsma-Rus, A. M., Robertson, L., Alfano, L. N., Mayhew, A. G., Gordish‐Dressman, H., Kelly, M., Morris, C. A., Straub, V. W., Weihl, C. C., Werth, C., et al. (2026) · Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases · doi:10.1177/22143602261438534 · Cited by 1
Kumar, S. S., Chapman, E. D., Becktel, D. A., Whitman, S. A., Crumpacker, R. H., Zbesko, J. C., Berchtold, D., Dames, C., Cuartero, M. I., García‐Culebras, A., et al. (2026) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2026.115878 · Cited by 1
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells as a Cell-Based Therapeutic in Stroke
Hess, D. C., Fakhri, N., & West, F. D. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15063-5_9 · Cited by 1
Mebius, A. (2015) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 1
Best Practice Guidelines on Publishing Ethics: A Publisher's Perspective, 2nd Edition*
Graf, C., Deakin, L., Docking, M., Jones, J. H., Joshua, S., McKerahan, T., Ottmar, M., Stevens, A., Wates, E., & Wyatt, D. (2014) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.12129 · Cited by 1
Suggestions and Recommendations on Statistical Analysis and Research Methodology
Voidăzan, S. T., Moldovan, C., & Dobreanu, M. (2014) · Revista română de medicină de laborator · doi:10.2478/rrlm-2014-0046 · Cited by 1
Determining Attention Deficits In Mouse Models Of Alzheimer’s Disease Using Touchscreen Systems
Masood, T. S. (2015) · Scholarship@Western (Western University) · Cited by 1
Preclinical oncology — reporting transparency needed
Gardner, E. E., & Rudin, C. M. (2015) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.216 · Cited by 1
Brunette, D. M. (2016) · Endodontic Topics · doi:10.1111/etp.12097 · Cited by 1
Neuroprotection Is Technology, Not Science
DeGracia, D. J., Taha, D., Anggraini, F. T., & Huang, Z.-F. (2017) · Springer series in translational stroke research · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45345-3_3 · Cited by 1
Bushby, K. M. D. (2015) · Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases · doi:10.3233/jnd-150096 · Cited by 1
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Important Tools in Understanding Drug Development for Stroke
McCann, S., Sena, E., Currie, G., Macleod, M., & Howells, D. (2017) · Springer series in translational stroke research · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45345-3_2 · Cited by 2
Self-citationReproducibility of biomedical research: Quo vadis?
Dal‐Ré, R., Bernad, A., & Garesse, R. (2016) · Medicina Clínica (English Edition) · doi:10.1016/j.medcle.2016.06.029 · Cited by 1
Efficient Two-Stage Designs and Proper Inference for Animal Studies
Cai, C. C., Piao, J., Ning, J., & Huang, X. (2017) · Statistics in Biosciences · doi:10.1007/s12561-017-9212-1 · Cited by 1
Lapchak, P. A. (2017) · Translational medicine research · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-5804-2_1 · Cited by 1
Experimental Models of Acute Kidney Injury
Maiden, M. J. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-44942-7.00017-0 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Landis, S. C., Amara, S. G., Asadullah, K., Austin, C. P., Blumenstein, R., Bradley, E. W., Crystal, R. G., Darnell, R. B., Ferrante, R. J., Fillit, H., Finkelstein, R., Fisher, M., Gendelman, H. E., Golub, R. M., Goudreau, J. L., Gross, R. A., Gubitz, A. K., Hesterlee, S. E., Howells, D. W., Huguenard, J., Kelner, K., Koroshetz, W., Krainc, D., Lazic, S. E., Levine, M. S., Macleod, M. R., McCall, J. M., Moxley III, R. T., Narasimhan, K., Noble, L. J., Perrin, S., Porter, J. D., Steward, O., Unger, E., Utz, U., & Silberberg, S. D.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Bayer (Germany) (DE)
- CHDI Foundation (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation (US)
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
- University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
- American Medical Association (US)
- Michigan State University (US)
- University of Rochester Medicine (US)
- Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy (US)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Stanford University (US)
- American Association For The Advancement of Science (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (CH)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Western General Hospital (GB)
- Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Therapy Development Institute (US)
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
- Corresponding author
- Silberberg, Shai D.
- ORCID
- Amara, Susan G.
- Crystal, Ronald G.
- Darnell, Robert B.
- Fillit, Howard
- Fisher, Marc
- Gendelman, Howard E.
- Goudreau, John L.
- Gross, Robert A.
- Howells, David W.
- Huguenard, John
- Koroshetz, Walter
- Krainc, Dimitri
- Lazic, Stanley E.
- Macleod, Malcolm R.
- Porter, John D.
- Steward, Oswald
- Unger, Ellis
- Utz, Ursula
- Silberberg, Shai D.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 490
- Issue
- 7419
- Pages
- 187-191
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC3511845
- OpenAlex
- W2137516955
- Cited by
- 1,196
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 116 · 2016: 136 · 2015: 129 · 2014: 115 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 149.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (Z99 NS999999, 5t32ns007280-35)
- National Institute of Mental Health (P30MH062261, T32MH020016)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (T32NS-007280, P01NS012151, R01NS041574, R01NS034774, R01NS006477)
- National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024160)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Keywords
- animal experimentation, preclinical research, reporting guidelines, reproducibility, sample size determination, randomization, blinding, data handling, translational research, grant applications, peer review
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Publishing, Random Allocation, Research Design, Statistics as Topic, Sample Size
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
